Preview

Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti Federalists

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
230 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti Federalists
Federalists were individuals who supported the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution as stated in the book, "the critics of the Constitution were by no means a unified group" (Faragher, 180). I found it interesting that the Constitution was initially influenced by the Federalist model in regards to interpretation but the pendulum has now swung in the opposite direction to a more Anti-Federalist approach (Content 8-2). The Constitution was ratified and the Federalists won for numerous reasons. The Anti-Federalists had delayed representation while the Federalists promised to amend the Constitution to better protect individual's rights (Faragher, 181). Overall, it was the Federalist representation, planning,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists Vs Antifederalist Analysis
    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page

    Federalists Vs Antifederalist Analysis

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq
    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq

    In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Views of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists on the Interpretation of the Constitution Essay Example
    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Views of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists on the Interpretation of the Constitution Essay Example

    Federalists, who most of them gained their livelihoods as merchants, shopkeepers, professionals, artisans, and commercial farmers, desired a government that would foster the growth of a market economy and facilitate trade with other countries. They also believed that society benefited when people pursued individual goals. Federalist James Madison claimed that the Constitution would be beneficial because a large republic contained more safeguards than a small one, but Anti-Federalists disagreed with that, because they favored small republics and because they feared the actions of men who would likely dominate the central government. Anti-Federalists, who were small farmers, many of them debtors, wanted nothing to do with this Constitution. They believed that the power should remain in the states. They argued that a republic must be geographically small with a homogeneous population in order to meet the needs of its people. Anti-Federalists also thought that the Constitution lacked adequate protection against corruption and abuse of power.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution
    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution

    Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Federalist And Democratic-Republicans
    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Federalist And Democratic-Republicans

    With many different views on how to run the government, it was hard to depict which parties’ group would be the strongest and the best fit to control the country: the Federalists’ or the Democratic-Republicans. The Federalists’ wanted a very strong government to bring together the bickering states. On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans pictured more independent state governments to rule the people. Although they didn’t agree on many things they did have one idea in common, such as, both parties wanted to follow the Constitution, but in different ways.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparing The Federalists And Democratic Differences
    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page

    Comparing The Federalists And Democratic Differences

    the Federalists and Democratic differences were that they both had a different leader Federalists had Alexander Hamilton and Democratic Republicans leader was Thomas Jefferson. Federalists, lost interception of the constitution and they, and also the federal constitution. The Federalist was in charge to protect the Tarrifs. Federalist thought that it should be educated men who should own their own property and would also protect everyone's rights. The Democratic Republicans differences were that the they wanted the limit the government power.…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Federalists
    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Federalists

    The federalist were mainly where the person that supported the constitution and was ready to approve it. Imagine living in Florida where it’s a very hot state, with a beautiful beach and many people with unique diversity. The kids running around the park without a care in the world. When you get home from a long day at work and you sit down on your favorite coach waiting for the Golden State Warriors game to come on. You see your friend telling you the warriors might lose against the Washington Wizards. In your head, you know very well this might not be true. Since you like Golden state is your favorite team and it like your home so you felt you should always stay loyal to it or even protect. Well, the Federalist feel closer to their home…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ratifying The Constitution Dbq
    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ratifying The Constitution Dbq

    The Anti-Federalist were those men who opposed the ratification of the Constitution in 1789. The Federalists were those who favored…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast Democratic And Federalists
    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page

    Compare And Contrast Democratic And Federalists

    Federalists and Democratic-Republicans are very different in the way they think and act. Federalists had a strong federal government and were ruled by a wealthy class while the Democratic republicans had a strong state government and were ruled by people…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast Democrats And Federalists
    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page

    Compare And Contrast Democrats And Federalists

    Did the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans like a lot of the same things? Well, they actually didn't like a lot of the same things and rarely saw eye to eye. One of the many things that they disagreed on or had different takes of it was the government. The Federalists wanted a strong government and would do all that they can to have one. The Republicans, on the other hand, did not want a strong government because they feared that if they had a strong government, they would endanger people's liberties. This is according to the text page 292. Another thing that they disagreed on was the French government or the French in general. The Federalists did not like the French very much but the Republicans did. The Republicans liked the French…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Anti Federalists
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dbq Anti Federalists

    The antifederalists were a coalition made up of people from many different backgrounds who opposed ratification of the Constitution. Their organization was not as good as the Federalists; however, they had a profound group of leaders who were exceptional in state politics. Anti-Federalists were an important existence in most states. In several states, supporters of the Constitution agreed to provide support from mild anti-Federalists with recommendations to secure amendments. During ratification the expectation was that the Constitution would be changed to address some of the opponents' concerns. The anti-Federalists worked within the Constitution's bounds after the ratification and they expected Federalists to do the same. Their ratification…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Difference Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists
    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page

    Difference Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists

    What's the difference between a Federalist and an Anti-federalist? Why did they have different perspectives on the ratification of the Constitution? Republicans and Democrats are not the original political parties. As i'm getting older i will be eligible to vote at the age 18, I will know the difference between the two. The Political parties had changed over the year where now the rules are way different back then.…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Antifederalists Vs Federalists
    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Antifederalists Vs Federalists

    The drafting of the new federal Constitution for the infant United States drew many staunch lines between federalists and antifederalists. These differences proved to be vast and in most cases complex, the antifederalists opposed the newly drafted constitution, while the federalists pushed for its ratification. These two primary views of how the United States government should function, made the ratification of the Constitution by no means a guarantee in 1787. Thus, the criticisms made by the antifederalists and the retorts returned by the federalists echoed the uncertainty of the United States in its infancy, plus these arguments demonstrated the blurred views on the “good society” and developed the Constitution into a document that preserved…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ratifying The Constitution Essay
    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ratifying The Constitution Essay

    In 1787 when the U.S. government was frail under the Articles of Confederation there was a debate on whether to ratify the U.S. Constitution. Those who supported the ratification were the Federalists, and those who opposed were known as the Anti- Federalists. Federalists believed in the idea of a strong central government while on the other hand Anti- federalists wanted their own states to have the right to set their own laws.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Vs Anti-Federalists
    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalist Vs Anti-Federalists

    They have the same goal in mind of how to make this country better, but have totally two different ways to approach the matter. The Anti-Federalists want the states to be in control. They believe that strong central government would threaten the people liberty and freedom. Their ideal government is the states and its people to be in charge, and the reason why is mainly because they do not want to have the same system of government like England. But, for the Federalists, they want to have a strong central government. The Federalists argued that, if the states were to have control, the country would be teared apart. On the Federalist #10 written by James Madison, he wrote that “There are again two methods of removing the causes of faction: the one, by destroying the liberty which is essential to its existence; the other, by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests.” The Federalists were afraid that by having too group of individuals with power, it can cause chaos by everyone have a voice and their interests. The Federalists wants a strong central government, so it can represent the people interest. Also, the Federalists think that with the check and balance system, the people freedom and liberty would be protected. According to the Federalist No. 51, it says “In order to lay a due foundation for that separate and distinct exercise of the different powers of government, which to a certain extent is admitted on all hands to be essential to the preservation of liberty, it is evident that each department should have a will of its own; and consequently should be so constituted that the members of each should have as little agency as possible in the appointment of the members of the others.” The Federalists want each branch of the government has its own agenda and power. But, no branch can overpower the others, so therefore the people freedom can be protected because no…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics