Preview

Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
536 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq
In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.
The Federalists believed that a strong central government was needed because of the cruel remarks that were made against America in European courts. (Doc. 1) These remarks led the …show more content…
(Doc. 6) They wanted to fix the constitution, because there were many things that needed to be fixed, so we could have a stronger government. The Federalist were afraid that the United States would have bad things happen and they were trying to prevent it from happening. (Doc. 4) Although the Anti-Federalist had their own beliefs about the constitution.
The Anti-Federalists believed that a strong state government was needed because if you have a strong central government than the people’s rights will not be ensured. (Doc. 4) Patrick Henry opposed the ratification of The Constitution because he believed that without it containing the Bill of Rights it would not allow the people have their natural rights. Anti-Federalist didn’t want to have a stronger national government because it could destroy the liberties of America that have been won during the Revolutionary
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ
    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain The Problems With The Framers Of The Constitution
    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain The Problems With The Framers Of The Constitution

    There are 13 articles in the constitution, the anti-federalists were all about the articles becuase it gave more power to the states, the federalists did not agree with that. There were many problems with the articles of confederation one of them being that 9 of the 13 states had to agree with a law in order to pass it. Another problem was since there was no president or executive branch there was no way to guarantee laws passed by congress were carried out. There were also no courts to judge or pune the law because there was no national court system.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti Federalists Pros And Cons
    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anti Federalists Pros And Cons

    Anti-Federalists restricted approval of the Constitution and favored the adjustment of power being with the states. They trusted that a capable national government would wind up being overbearing and there will be loss of flexibility, higher assessments, and no power for state laws or courts. The fundamental worry for the Anti-Federalists in the Federalist paper #10 was fairness rights for the general population. It is the reason they affirmed of Article 4, since they bolstered the privileges of the general population and having full confidence and credit given to the states influenced them to feel that the privileges of the states would be maintained. The Anti-Federalists battled for the restriction of ratification in the Constitution just…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And The Federalists
    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation And The Federalists

    It was the year of 1787 and the country was in conflict. The new constitution had just been written and states were deciding to ratify it (Davidson, 205). This constitution would hopefully protect better than the Articles of Confederation did. As with many other situations, there were two sides; the Federalists and the Antifederalists. Federalists agree with the Constitution while Antifederalists disagree (Davidson, 205). Each side had valid arguments, but the Federalists more so. Federalists argued to support the Constitution because it allots the federal government power over trade and tax, gives each branch checks and balances on one another, and can be changed.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Antifederalist And Federalists
    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Antifederalist And Federalists

    The Federalists and Antifederalists fighting over the ratification of the Constitution brought great hardships for the newly emerging U.S. government and left behind two legacies that would cause conflict for years to come. Both of these groups came from very different social and economic backgrounds. The Federalists were advocates for the ratification of the Constitution while the Antifederalists were advocates for the Articles of Confederation. These parties paved the road for two legacies that still shape America to this day.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Anti Federalists
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dbq Anti Federalists

    The Anti-Federalist had concerns almost immediately after its release. One of the concerns was how much power would be held by Congress. There was a clause in the Constitution that allowed Congress to make laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into ongoing powers. The Anti-Federalists often argued that this would allow the national government to create any law it wished. Importantly they did not want laws that would be harmful and unrepresentative for the people. In addition, the Constitution contained a supremacy clause that recognized the national government as the final arbiter of its disputes for the state which did not seem to be a fair option for the Anti-Federalists. This clause caused the anti-Federalists to believe that states and their citizens would be at the mercy of the national…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti-Pluralists Vs Federalists
    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anti-Pluralists Vs Federalists

    The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution and believed that it gave the federal government too much power, while taking away the power of the individual states. They also wanted a bill of rights to guarantee certain liberties, which the Constitution did not have at the time. They also thought the federal government created would not represent the normal citizen very well. In addition, they argued that as a federal government,…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anti-Federalists Argumentative Analysis
    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anti-Federalists Argumentative Analysis

    The anti-federalist was against a strong federal government right from the start. They believed if the federal government got too strong it would just take all the power away from each individual state. The anti-federalists fought to expand the amount of representation and felt that on a larger scale corruption would be less likely to go on. Smith in his speeches states, "In so small a number of representatives, there is great danger from corruption and combination" (Melancton Smith, Speeches pg 583). Smith and the rest of the anti-federalists felt that if the representation was too small then factions will form. Factions within a government will form no matter what but factions within the most elites of society can be very detrimental to a government. John Mercer goes on too in his essays to say "The few representatives can always corrupt themselves by legislative speculations, from the pockets of their numerous…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anti-Federalists Argumentative Essay
    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anti-Federalists Argumentative Essay

    As Anti-Federalists, we argued for civil rights, and power to the people. For what seemed like an eternity, we had debated over the ratification of the constitution. Many things were said with a lot of elaboration and detail to go in them, but ultimately, it came down to four core words. Power to the people. One of the reasons that we had rejected the new central government was because it possessed too much power, and it ripped away the prestige for the states, and threatened their sovereignty. It did the same to the…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Vs Anti-Federalists
    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalist Vs Anti-Federalists

    The year of 1787, when delegates gathered in Philadelphia to the draft a new constitution for the country. Curtain groups of people at the time think that the old document "Article of Confederation" was going to divide this country apart. At the time, there were two parties, one opposed the idea of drafting the new constitution, the Anti Federalists. The other is the Federalist, who supported the idea. The Anti-federalists argued that the new constitution would post a threat to its people freedom and liberty. They said that the constitution would give the central government too much power, and at the end may ends up like their mother land, England. But, the Federalists have a totally different view on this matter. The federalists argued that…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anti-Federalists Vs Anti-Federalists
    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anti-Federalists Vs Anti-Federalists

    When a new plan of government was presented in the ratification of the Constitution, two coalitions of people were created: Federalists, who supported the new Constitution; and the Anti-Federalists, who were against the new form of government. During the Constitutional Convention, both parties presented their case, their form of government and evidence supporting why that was the best way for America to be governed. America must have a National and a State government in order to function properly and fulfill its people’s needs.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist
    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalist

    When the constitution formed, two groups emerged, one as being the Federalist and the other as the anti- Federalist, each having two completely different views on the constitution. The Federalist supported the Constitution and believed that the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances would protect the Americans from tranny. Also felt that the power should be spread among 3 different branches, the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch. The anti- Federalist which opposed the Constitution, where against having a strong central government in fear of the government ignoring rights of majority, but the biggest problem was the constitution lacked any protection for individual rights.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Anti Federalists
    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Essay On Anti Federalists

    In conclusion, the Anti Federalist and the Articles of Confederation may have had good intentions for the country, but it wasn’t so good for the people. The Articles of Confederation gave the states too much power so they could do whatever they wanted which caused division in the country because every state had its own currency. When the Constitution was put in place though, it unified the United States by giving the Central Government the power to rule over the states. The federalist and the Constitution were significantly better than their opposites which is why the Constitution is still around to this…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalists Vs Anti Federalism Essay
    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalists Vs Anti Federalism Essay

    Federalists and Anti-Federalists were the two primary political parties at the time the Constitution was written. However, these two groups preferred different types of government. Nevertheless, Federalists wanted a government that was strong and powerful at the heart and was ruled mostly by the upper class, while Anti-Federalists preferred a government that wasn’t ruled so much by the central government, but more ruled by the states so that they could have their own rights.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution Limits Government Power To Protect Individual Rights
    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Constitution Limits Government Power To Protect Individual Rights

    They believed the constitution gave excessive power to the federal government and thought the Constitution would create a government that the people could not control. Anti-Federalists had argued that a strong national government in a large nation would be prone to the abuses that had destroyed republics since ancient times. They also believed that certain systems among the branches would eventually turn against the people's liberties and no longer protect the rights of the people.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More