Nato Expansion And The Future Of European Security
A more assertive Foreign Minister and a more nationalist Duma are now in power in Moscow. Both face serious challenges in pursuit of two principal foreign policy goals articulated by the new Foreign Minister, Yevgeni Primakov: Defending Russia's national interests and developing ties with the United States.
One of Russia's primary challenges comes from Washington's drive to expand NATO into Eastern Europe. With good reason, Moscow strongly opposes expansion of the Atlantic alliance. In principle, it would enable western troops to deploy, exercise and patrol on the borders of the former Soviet Union and permit Eastern Europe to become a potential staging area for NATO's tactical nuclear weapons. In practice, it would dramatically change the strategic calculus in Europe to Moscow's disadvantage.
Western proponents of expansion argue that NATO has always been a defensive alliance, that its enlargement will "stabilize" Eastern Europe, and that stabilization will enhance rather than degrade Russia's security. NATO's disingenuous dismissal of Russian national security concerns fails to address the key political problem: Moscow considers NATO expansion as an effort to isolate rather than integrate Russia into Europe's post-Cold war security architecture. Fear of isolation has been an underlying--if not explicit--concern of Russia since at least the time of German reunification. Thus, in Moscow's eyes, NATO expansion is part of an effort to deny Russia an appropriate role in the new Europe's security arrangements.
While it is unclear what a truly "European" security architecture might actually look like, and how Russia might best be integrated into it, there are several obvious components of this structure. The first and most basic element is the continued successful implementation of a host of arms control arrangements, most importantly the conventional armed forces in Europe (CFE) treaty. This arrangement, under which nearly 50,000 items of...
View Full Essay