12 Angry Men
Below is one of our free research papers on 12 Angry Men. If the term paper below is not exactly what you're looking for, you can search our essay database for other topics or order a custom essay.
Related Essays
-
12 Angry Man
Twelve Angry Men for a number of reasons. The first reason is that when all the other jurors voted guilty without even thinking about their decisions, Juror #8 su...
-
12 Angry Men
Angry Men The plot of 12 Angry Men revolves around the murder trail of a Latino boy who is accused of killing his father. The conviction of the boy would mean a d...
-
12 Angry Men
Though all 12 jurors are white men, they are a varied crew. They attempt to sit still around the heavy table at the centre of Allen Moyer's set, but in their pass...
-
King
The Story of Pyotr Smirnov and the Upheaval of an Empire Linda Himelstein To m y f a m i l y , t h e b e s t t h e r e i s A man comes from the dust and in the du...
-
Drama Analysis 12 Angry Men'
How does the playwright of 12 Angry Men use characterisation to explore ideas?" Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose is a drama that looks at the prejudices and...
12 Angry Men
12 Angry Men
Juror #8 is the Most Important Juror #8. He was the most important juror in the play Twelve Angry Men for a number of reasons. The first reason is that when all the other jurors voted guilty without even thinking about their decisions, Juror #8 suggested that they talk about it before jumping to conclusions. Even when some of the other jurors got mad and started yelling at him, he stayed calm and tried to work things out in a mature fashion. The second reason is that he convinced Juror #9 to change his vote to not guilty. This was an important step because it paved the way for the other jurors to change their minds also. The third reason is Juror #8 re-enacted scenes from the night of the murder in order to prove his points. The first reason Juror #8 was the most important juror is that when all the other jurors quickly voted guilty, without discussing it first, he suggested that they talk about it for a little bit. When asked if he thought the boy was guilty or not guilty, he said, “I don’t know.” This shows that he hadn’t decided one way or the other. When asked why he voted this way, he replied, “ It’s not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first.” This shows that he wanted to talk things over with the other jurors before he makes a decision. Later on he said, “I just want to talk for a while.” This is more proof that he wanted to discuss the issue. The second reason Juror #8 was the most important juror is because he convinced Juror #9 to change his vote to not guilty. This was important because if no one changed his or her decision in the second vote, Juror #8 said he would change his vote to not guilty. However, Juror #9 did change his vote giving Juror #8 more time to talk about the case. Juror #9 said, “He gambled for support and I gave it to him. I want to hear more.” By convincing one person to change their vote, it forced everybody to listen to more arguments, and possibly change their thinking...
View Full Essay