Preview

Why did stalin destroy the kulaks?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
425 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why did stalin destroy the kulaks?
Collectivisation was Stalin's answer to his belief that Russia's agriculture was in a terrible state. Stalin believed that Russia had to be able to feed itself - hence collectivisation - and that at the very least the peasant farmers should be providing food for the workers in the factories if the Five Year Plans were going to succeed. There was barely any mechanisation, the use of scientific measures was minimal and peasant farmers produced usually for themselves and the local area. This was not good enough for Stalin.

To change all this and update Russia's agriculture, Stalin introduced collectivisation. This meant that small farms would be gathered together to form one large massive one. These bigger farms would be called collectives. As they were large, there was every reason to use machinery on them. The more food that could be grown the better as the cities and factories could suitably be fed. Hungry factory workers would not be in a fit enough state to work effectively.

However, many richer peasants, 'kulaks', were against collectivisation. The land that Lenin had given them was now being taken away by Stalin. Villages that refused to join a collective had soldiers sent to them and the villagers were usually shoot as "enemies of the revolution" or "enemies of the people". The land, now freed from ownership, was handed to the nearest collective farm.

Those villages that were due for collectivisation but did not want to join a collective, killed their animals and destroyed their grain so that they could not be taken by the soldiers and secret police. Thus began an era of almost unparalleled slaughter of farm animals and the systematic destruction of grain.

The 10% reduction in grain collected was a significant decline. The secret police took to confiscating what they could find and feeding the collectives that were loyal and the factory workers. Therefore many peasant farmers who were anti-collectivisation starved or died in the labour camps of Siberia. It

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The peasants were essentially bound to their land as they had no access to funds or passports to travel. The two types of farms faced disadvantages, for example the Kolkhozy farms (collective state farms) had to meet state obligations which were 60-70% of their output and only received trivial rewards in return (such as sacks of potatoes). Even though the war had caused so many deaths, the Politburo remained to see the peasants as disposable after the war. Also Stalin did not trust the peasants as he said they were “too individualistic to make good socialists” and therefore increased the taxes on them. So this is not recovery as the lifestyle, especially for peasants, got worse.…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin Dbq Research Paper

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were several reasons. Stalin sought to reorganize the Soviet Union via his Five Year Plans, which called for a radical industrialization as well as collectivisation to increase agricultural production and efficiency. This increased agricultural output was necessary to support the rapid industrialization he espoused; how else could the workers be fed? Many peasants who had been awarded or taken their land...to liquidating the kulaks as a class" (Document 5.3 Collectivisation 181). Millions were sent to labor camps, deported and died. The impossible demands made on the peasant farmers of increased production, only to turn everything over to the state, resulted in peasants that remained on the land at first hiding, then burning their crops/killing their animals rather than give them up "Stock was slaughtered every night..." (History in Quotations #5). An infuriated Stalin sent industrial workers into the country to show the peasants 'Bolshevik firmness' "without any rotten liberalism...[or] bourgeois humanitarianism...[and with]extreme measures" to get the grain. (Document 5.4 Horror in the Village…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This period of time ensured many changes, positive and negative regarding the labor system. It is evident that serfdom congealed from about 1750 onwards, meaning that the peasants were required to provide free labor for a particular number of days a year or a specific amount of money to their lords. The time of labor depended on when it was needed. For example, during harvesting or sowing. The job had to be done, regardless, the peasants own farming responsibilities. Subsequent to the emancipation of serfs in 19th century, they had to buy their own freedom, as they were granted land they also had to pay for working on it. Eventually, such strict limitations caused farmers and peasants to leave their farming business and seek more opportunities in large urban areas. That lead to Russia’s rapid industrialization during the 18th. However, prior to Russia's industrialization workers set up guilds to protect their interests. Such guilds were often set up in areas where workers migrated to work - such as logging camps, and were often communal. Although, as the industrialization finally occurred in 19th century, people traveled to cities seeking more opportunities, causing the population to extremely swell. Such overpopulation ensued in dangerous working conditions, very poor sanitation and exploitation of the workers. Such circumstances were very hard to fight off as Russia didn’t have a very strong reformist movement to address such problematic aspects of the society. Unsuccessful attempts to reform the working class troubles, resulted in growing unrest and discontent among all. Eventually, public announcement of opinions was strictly forbidden and punished by a trip to Siberia, which was later widely expanded by the…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin imposed collectivism, which took all the farm land from the Kulaks, leaving them homeless and unemployed It was forbidden to give aid to the Kulaks, and eventually they were forced in to slavery to survive, and any Kulak who refused slavery was deported Forced Famine under the rule of Joseph Stalin By 1932, 75% of all farmland had been acquired by Stalin’s regime and he was exporting so much food from this region, there was no food left to feed the Ukranian people (Trueman, 2013) The Ukranian Communist party reached out for support from the Soviet Communist party and were soon stamped out by Stalin’s loyal soldiers, sent to subdue the Ukranians Starvation was so prevalent that people fled the country side to larger cities, only to find starvation there as well, with bodies of the dead lining the streets Forced Famine under the rule of Joseph Stalin…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Agriculture was a crucial area which needed to be reformed if Russia was to ever be modernised. At the root of the inherently backward Russia was the peasant workforce, who mainly worked in the agricultural sector, which left Russia a world away from other European Countries in terms of industry. ‘Out of the 60 million people in European Russia in 1855, 50 million were peasant serfs’1; this was a huge obstacle to modernisation as it limited. The goal of Emancipation was to release the peasants from the land that they were bound to in order to create an industrial workforce that would drive modernisation. The predominantly agricultural workforce would now work in factories thus changing Russia into an industrial juggernaut, which would be key in modernising Russia. The reform was also crucial as it was the first step in the deconstruction of the Ancien Regime within Russia. Emancipation was key in establishing support for the monarchy, ‘in other countries Serf emancipation took place as a consequence of social and organic change’2, this meant that in Russia the monarchy had…

    • 1981 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia progressed towards an economic system of government owned business and redistribution, known as communism. Prior to Russia developing into communism they were a capitalist state. The last time we see a non communist state in Russia before 1939 would be under Czar Nicholas II. Previous social conditioning in Russia led to popular beliefs among the peasantry that the land belongs to the farmers, or at least it should. However, a small number of the peasantry had owned any land at all. And they also had other reasons to hold feelings of discontent. The Russian working conditions were simply atrocious. Workers saw work jour of 12, 14, and 16 hours long. And the factories which they worked on were overcrowded and were obvious dangers to their long-term and immediate health. And for all of the hardship faced workers would see dismal pay, barely enough to supply for their family. However, what led Russia past the threshold…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the story “Execution by Hunger” by Miron Dolot it was terrible as the Holocaust. In 1930, Stalin announced a campaign of collectivization that all “kulaks” were to be eliminated as a social class. Collectivization was organized by Communist officials who were assists by the police and red army units. Due to all this tragedy hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian were sent away for forced labor in the far northern regions of the Soviet Union.…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By Stalin's own admission, kulaks supplied only a fifth of the Soviet Union's marketable grain surplus…” (Krawchenko, 1). In all actuality- despite Stalin’s accusations- the peasantry and poor people made up about three quarters of the output. Due to his need to exterminate and rid Ukraine of kulaks, the entire lower class…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Joseph Stalin forced the Ukrainian famine in order to undermine the nationalistic pride of the Ukrainians. Vladimir Lenin’s actions to resolve the resentment in Ukraine were unacceptable to Stalin. Lenin stopped exporting a large amount of the country’s grain and also encouraged a free-market way of exchanging goods. Lenin’s relaxed rule renewed the people’s interest in celebrating their language, customs, poetry, art, music and Ukrainian Orthodox religion. The Ukrainians’ independent spirit made them a threat to Joseph Stalin. When he wanted to build a strong industrial base, the Ukrainians did not stray from their peasant traditions. When Stalin wanted to abolish private ownership of land, the people refused to give up their land. On December 27, 1929, Joseph Stalin announced his plan to force the remaining Ukrainian peasants onto government-owned collective farms. In order to destroy the people seeking independence from Soviet rule, Stalin deprived the Ukrainians of their own food supplies (The History Place-…

    • 1914 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This was just the initial stages of Stalin’s war against the Ukrainians or “kulaks” as Stalin called them. But the quota he set for them to produce was six almost seven million tons of grain. This was an impossible quota to meet, especially since collective farms were always less productive than private…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The peasants and working class citizens of Russia in 1900 were not pleased with their living or working conditions. The also constituted for roughly 77% of Russia’s overall population. Those who worker in the agricultural industry doing tasks such as farming faced numerous hardships. The working days were long and arduous, there was little time for rest and near no time for pleasure. The work was tiring and caused exhaustion however the peasants were forced to endure and make do. Any money they did make was spent on taxes and paying their respective debts or landowners.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After 250 years of living under Russian Tsarist rule, the Ukrainians became part of the Soviet Union in 1922. Farmers thrived, economic freedom was permitted, and private enterprise was allowed. Among these, writers, artists, and scholars grew. Stalin, in 1924, took over Russia after the previous leader, Vladimir Lenin, died. Later, in 1928, Stalin launched a plan to force farmers into giving up their private land, livestock, and farms. Joseph Stalin felt he could not trust the Ukraine peasantry; he believed that the upper class farmers, or kulaks, were holding crops. Stalin took all the grain from the peasants. He had his men search for any hidden grain and Stalin analyzed fecal matter to see if the Ukrainians had stolen ‘government property’ and eaten the grain themselves. It was because of Stalin that many starved and resorted to eating anything. They drank water to fill their empty bellies. Small children perished first, then the elderly, followed by the men, and soon after, the women. Up to twenty-five percent of the population died because Stalin took all of the food.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The End Condition Analysis

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages

    On the other hand, detractors like Rosa Luxemburg and Aleksandra Kollontai believed while a central body of elites had its place in the movement, its sole role should be the nominal guidance of the overall working class: allowing the masses to work towards their ideal form of communism on local and regional levels, rather than dictating terms from the top down. Unfortunately, the centralists won the day in the Soviet Union, and the populace was subjugated to a strict, state interpretation of what communism was to be. In the short-run, the Soviet Union was able to make significant gains in terms of industry, military strength, and global prestige, but at the expense of the strength of its civil society –an issue that was only magnified when Stalin succeeded Lenin, and implemented a series of brutal purges that led to what Scott classified as a perfect set-up to the worst possible outcome of High Modernist thought. Collectivization of agricultural fields meant that individual rights were sidelined for overall productivity; designers aimed for simplicity in grouping these agricultural lands, and foresaw an increase in productivity that warranted relegating individuals as mere numbers. Reducing people into numbers is what allowed the authoritarian government to weather out the…

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Collectivisation was the first agricultural policy taken on by Mao which was unsupported by the peasants in the countryside, who were the majority of the population. The policy contributed hugely to the scale of the famine as it involved joining peasant families together to farm collectively rather than individually and then sharing the food produced with the rest of the community. This, in theory, was a good idea; if the peasants worked together they could share knowledge and potentially grow more food. However, they didn’t like the policy as it meant, regardless of how much they grew individually, they would only get a set amount, and it was never enough to feed the whole family. Mao believed that many peasants were growing more food than necessary and keeping some for themselves, however this was proved not to be the case; production rate had fallen from 200 million in 1958 to 143.5 million in 1960. Mao simply didn’t trust the peasants, believing they were ‘inherently capitalist’ and were against being a communist state. The peasants resented farming collectively because they didn’t have enough land to farm their crops, as well as the fact that the authorities believed that they needed to be ‘strictly controlled and directed.’ This attitude towards them caused the peasants to be reluctant to hand over their crops to the state, however they had no choice as they were no longer allowed to farm for themselves and the grain produced went to the State instead, to feed…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    communists had done little to change Russian agriculture. Still using traditional techniques, and had distinct lack of revolutionary sprit – farmed for themselves rather than for the good, of 'mother Russia' This lead many communists to believe that collectivisation was essencial for the capitalist peasants to embrace socialism.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays