Preview

South Carolina Nullification

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
794 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
South Carolina Nullification
9/25/12 Adv. U.S. History
South Carolina Ordinance of Nullification, November 24, 1832

Throughout the great American history, Americans have been through a colossal amount of conflicts, and wars. However, they still figured out a way to compromise and accept each other’s differences. As America improves, they gradually lead to a making of a powerful and organized government. Yet in “South Carolina Ordinance of Nullification” a conflict arises, where South Carolina is furious at the federal government and wants the best for themselves. Like many other states South Carolina is one of which that had its own negative opinions towards the federal government, leading to a larger problem. The document “South Carolina Ordinance of Nullification” both supports and contradicts American and constitutional principles. In early 1860’s the Civil war took place, against the North and the South parts of America. In the time that was taken to reach the civil war, many small disagreements and arguments took place that eventually led to having an immense war. However, around three decades earlier, South Carolina had been having disagreements with the federal government. On May 19, 1928 the Congress of the United States passed the Tariff of 1828. The tariff was designed to protect industries in the northern United States which were being driven out of business, by low-priced imported goods by putting tax on them. Well it seems as if this was a great idea, until, the south started to feel the effects of it, on their antebellum economy. The south called the tariff of 1828, “Tariff of Abominations”. “South Carolina felt that the protective features of tariffs were harmful to them and they also claimed that they were unconstitutional because they favored North over the South.” (u-s-history.com)A government should serve their people with equality and liberty. Instead the federal government chose to be unfair and help the north because that’s where they



Citations: http://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/Nullification.html http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080414073847AALgm3K http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff_of_1828 http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h333.html | | http://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/Nullification.html,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    APUSH Chapter 12

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Said in end: right of nullification by states Rights of the states to ignore the laws placed by the federal government…

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tariffs of this era are perhaps the most easily related to sectional differences. Tariffs had always been fought by the south. The south viewed tariffs as a way to tax the south because they would tax the south's imports and exports whereas little or nothing would be taxed in the north. This meant that there was an ongoing war in Congress of the sectional differences. The tariff of abominations was the boiling point for many southerners which resulted in South Carolina causing another…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue of slavery became an even greater concern when the Louisiana Purchase territories were to enter the Union as states. The question was, would new territories enter the Union as slave or free states? The South wanted a balance of power. They knew that if the North were to have more free states, then slavery in the south could be facing extinction through congress. In an attempt to conciliate with the South, the North agreed upon the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Through this, slavery was banned above the 36 degrees 30 minute line and Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine a free state. For a while, it retained the balance of power. However, tempers in the south rose again later in the 1820s over high tariffs. The tariffs benefitted the north but threatened southern cotton exports. In 1828, the tariff was around 50%. President Jackson modified it to around 33% in 1832 only to have South Carolina nullify it in the state. It raised the question of whether or not the federal government could legally impose protective tariffs and whether it was constitutional for a state to nullify a federal law. "South…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The plot of the Film is in South Carolina during the American Revolution. It takes place around 1776. It is about a man, Benjamin, who is trying to fight against the redcoats with his sons. Two of his sons die because of the red coats leader. The family just wants a peaceful life, nothing to disturb them, and most definitely don’t want to be part of a war. Benjamin’s oldest son, Gabriel, finds out that they can sign up for the war, he is right there at the sign up sheet. Benjamin had forbidden him of signing up, but he did it anyways. There are many battles throughout the whole movie and there are also many deaths. Benjamin is known as “the ghost” because he kills many people without anybody ever seeing him. At the end of the movie, Benjamin’s…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The southern States now stand almost exactly in the same position as our ancestors did some 85 years ago. The difference is that Great Britain made no pretense that we were equal and had an equal say in matters. The Northern States, having the majority in Congress, claim the same power over us in legislation as the British Parliament did. The government of the United States has become a consolidated Government, and the people of the Southern States are compelled to meet the very tyranny their fathers threw off in the Revolutionary War. The tariffs which were imposed upon the South, forcing us to buy products from the North, sounds similar to what Great Britain did in the past does it not? "The reason for possible secession will be found at the foundation of our political fabric, in our complex organism, in the fundamental law, in the Constitution itself, in the conflicting constructions which it invited, and in the institution of slavery which it recognized and was intended to protect." (John B. Gordon)…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    U.S hISTORY

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    12. How did South Carolina react in 1832 to the tariffs imposed by the federal government?…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    America? What was the argument concerning “nullification”? Why did the southern states want to leave the Union?…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson: Whigs Editorial

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The nullification crisis started when a proposed alliance of South and West to reduce tariff and the price of land did not happen. This was because Webster had discredited the South in the eyes of the western patriots and partly because the plants of South Carolina and Georgia, feared the competition of the fertile cotton lands in the West, opposed rapid exploitation of the West. When the tariff of 1832 was passed, the South began the talk of nullification. Jackson realized that if states can nullify laws of Congress, the Union would not exist. So he gave a warning to the South Carolina representative, but the representative did not take it seriously. The convention passed ordinance of nullification prohibiting the collection of tariff duties in states. Then the state legislature authorized the raising of an army an approved money to supply weapons. In response, Jackson began military preparations. He also tried to resolve this peacefully by trying to lower the tariff even more. On December 10, Jackson told the people of South Carolina that disunion by armed forces would be an act of treason and if they do that, he would resort to use force. South Carolina finally backed down when the new tariff and the force bill was approved. Jackson did the right thing by trying to resolve the nullification, but he took it too far. He made threats that weren’t necessary, he even threatened his Vice President, Calhoun. Even the followers of Jackson thought we was acting too rash. Those threats weren’t needed since South Carolina ended up backing down once they got something they wanted.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This apparent contradiction regarding Andrew Jackson and him opposing South Carolina’s assertion of state sovereignty during the nullification crisis of 1832-1833 is his revival Henry Clay. Due to Clay planning out his plan, Jackson asked Congress to enact legislation permitting him to use federal troops to enforce federal laws in the opposition of…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The South did not like the tariff saying it only benefited the North and made the South pay higher prices.…

    • 3587 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reasoning behind the crisis was that South Carolina felt that the tariffs of 1828 were unconstitutional and refused to pay them. Ellis (1989) said that Jackson struggled the most with tariffs during his presidency, and found the tariffs to be…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Southerners felt that the Federal government was passing laws, such as import taxes, that treated them unfairly. They believed that individual states had the right to "nullify", or overturn, any law the Federal government passed. They also believed that individual states had the right to leave the United States and form their own independent country. Most people in the North believed that the concepts of "nullification" and "states ' rights" would make the United States a weaker country and were against these ideas. (“Causes of Civil War,” 2005)…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many differences between the antebellum North and South regions of America, and many of these were economical. The most obvious of which is that the North was, for the most part, industrial; while the South on the other hand was economically dependent of the production of staple crops (primarily cotton). The production of cotton in the South with the advent of the cotton gin soared, causing an increase of labor required; this lead to a dependency on slave labor in the south. Slavery was something the North often looked down upon and also held little or no value to them. How could a nation survive with no conflict when there were two very distinct sides that held opposing economic ideals and beliefs?…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Caused Secession?

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The South started to think that it is “Better leave the Union in the open face of day, than be lighted from it at midnight by the [arsonist’s] torch.” (Document 2) They also said that “All citizens of the United States have an equal right to settle with their property in the Territory, without their rights,…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    int trade

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lecture 5. Why Did the North Want a Tariff, and Why Did the South Call It an…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays