Preview

Soul and Socrates

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2309 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Soul and Socrates
Purposely difficult and intentionally obsessive, Plato's Phaedrus is an exceedingly difficult read that defies all conventional logic as a piece of discourse. The text is extremely subjective, open to interpretation and individual creativity as to what or whom the narrative is about. Written by Plato, a close disciple of Socrates, this text is set along the Illissus river where Phaedrus and Socrates meet for a day of speech, debate, rhetoric and okay…flirting. Phaedrus leads of the day and recites a speech by his close friend Lysias, who Phaedrus considers to be a top speechmaker. Socrates then, after chiding by Phaedrus unleashes two speeches of his own that overshadow and refute Lysias claim so boldly that Phaedrus is so taken by the power of Socrates, that Phaedrus I think misses the point of the entire speech. I think the main idea of the Phaedrus is that Plato's purpose in writing the document, and using Phaedrus as an example of the reader of this dialogue, is to develop a mad passion to pursue wisdom because of the way Socrates hints, and later describes his definitions of madness, pursuit of wisdom, and critical thinking.
For it were a simple fact that insanity is evil, the saying would be true; but in reality the greatest blessings come to us through madness, when it is sent as a gift of the gods (465).

I think that one of the most powerful claims in the entire text is that of how madness is essential to pursue virtually everything, including Phaedrus' beloved wisdom. In the quote Socrates is not suggesting or insinuating an aspect of his lesson; he is not merely attempting to get Phaedrus to think, as he so often does in this text, but right here in this quote Socrates declares his love for the ability to be mad. The ability to want something so bad, so vehemently, is what Socrates flat out told Phaedrus, is nothing short of god-like. Socrates said this after his first speech when I believe Phaedrus is just starting to "fall under the spell" that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Plato’s Phaedo, socrates tells us his theories of the soul before and after death. He shows us that the body and soul are separate and the soul stays after death and lives before being born.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates’ passage is formulated by the knowledge that the soul consists of three parts that are predisposed by our own desires. He is fundamentally attempting to disprove the notion that the soul is one.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Book IV 435d-445e seems to be Socrates’ argument about the three parts of the human soul and how the human soul with its three parts are parallel to the republic and the three different kinds of citizens. What I am interested in is the methods that Socrates implements to come to his conclusions. More specifically, I would like to talk about Socrates’ analogies that he uses to come to his conclusions.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was a man of very distinct descriptions. He believed that we all would meet in a place in the afterlife. We would follow a guide down our chosen path according to the life we lived. Socrates didn’t have a fear of death or the path he would travel in the afterlife. He had a very detailed idea of how the terrain would be. He envisioned in exquisite detail of the beauty of the afterlife. He spoke of the path that people would take based on the type of person they were and the acts they committed. He is a man that doesn’t have a fear for death. He is a man that believes that there is life after death.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As translators Alexander Nehamas and Paul Woodruff explain it, “The Phaedrus is a dialogue in the most literal sense. Unlike a number of others of Plato’s works, it is a conversation between two and only two people.” This dialogue by Plato features only two speakers—Socrates and Phaedrus. Socrates is a learned man who has never set foot beyond the city walls; as a scholar, all he has ever needed could be found right in Athens. Phaedrus is a grown man with remarkable admiration for rhetoric and speech-making, but little understanding of Socrates’ philosophical approaches. Their ongoing dialogue—originally about the practicality of love and its subsequent madness—serves as a metaphorical basis for the proper use of rhetoric, which Socrates voraciously argues is not just a means of entertainment, but rather a foundation of views to which one’s life can be lived. His attitude toward both philosophy and rhetoric is that life would be miserable without such deep matters of conversation, and that neither can exist solely without the other. Throughout Phaedrus, the reader is presented with various arguments using both verities, and how they relate to such grandiose topics like love, madness, and the soul. These issues are presented to the reader through a series of dialogues solely between Socrates and Phaedrus. Although assumed by most experts to be a purely fictitious discussion, the beliefs Plato presents in Phaedrus essentially mirror that which his mentor Socrates held in reality; rhetoric must be used with the true knowledge of what one is talking about, but is simultaneously crucial to the endorsement of an argument. I am going to analyze the uses of this rhetoric in Phaedrus and how it affects the transmission of such ideas between the two interlocutors, as well as the intertwining of both rhetoric and concept and how they affect each character’s ethos.…

    • 1877 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Was Socrates Failure

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    His views are rather romantic with a nostalgic perspective. Socrates is not skeptical unlike sophist philosophers of his age. He reasons, however, with a firm belief in his own conception of this world which is a projection of a higher world of ideas functioning in harmony. He believes that gods are just (Plato, 29). Homer's Iliad on the other hand states otherwise, portraying gods are cruel and jelous. Therefore, Socrates thinks within his own ideology. He tries to impose his ideology to Thrasymachus who never disagrees with him at all. For example, in Socrates' opinion, injustice causes civil strife, antagonism and disorder while justice brings friendship and a sense of common purpose. However, in a World which does not precisely regulate the terms of justice or injustice, Thrasymachus' view that justice always looks to the advantage of the stronger makes more sense. Thrasymachus' claims are based on his own experience of Ancient Greek life while Socrates' statements hardly related to the realities of the life surrounding him. He is blinded by what he firmly believes. He is trying to adjust the common realities of the society to his own ideology. Altough he is able to convince Thrasymachus at the end, what he does during this process is misleading. Thrasymachus seems to be an agent for Socrates to express his ideology in a dialogue for.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Death of Socrates

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The Death of Socrates” was painted by a French painter . His name was Jacques Louis David. The painting represents the scene of the death of Greek philosopher Socrates. He was condemned to die by drinking hemlock for the expression of his ideas against those of Athens' and corrupting the minds of the youth. The painting also depicts both Plato and Crito, with the former sitting at the edge of the bed and the latter clutching the knee of Socrates. Socrates had the choice to go into exile and , hence, give up his philosophic vocation or be sentenced to death by drinking hemlock. Socrates chose death. In this painting, someone hands a confident Socrates the goblet of hemlock. Socrates' hand pointing to the heavens indicating his defiance of the gods and fearless attitude to his death.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    socrates

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    himself, yet in reality he was not. So I then tried to show him that he thought…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madness is something rare in individuals, but in groups, parties, peoples, ages it is the rule. (Nietzsche, 1886)…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle considered the most fundamental features of reality in the twelve books of the Μεταφυσικη(Metaphysics). Although experience of what happens is a key to all demonstrative knowledge, Aristotle supposed that the abstract study of "being qua being" must delve more deeply, in order to understand why things happen the way they do. A quick review of past attempts at achieving this goal reveals that earlier philosophers had created more difficult questions than they had answered: the Milesians over-emphasized material causes; Anaxagoras over-emphasized mind; and Plato got bogged down in the theory of forms. Aristotle intended to do better.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of these comparisons, the reader is better able to see Socrates as more than just a hostile individual. Alcibiades not only praises Socrates, but clears his name as someone who only embarrassed citizens and flaunted his intelligence. Under the arrogance of a Satyr and ugliness, he was an individual filled to the brim with gold on the inside. Plato makes it clear that Alcibiades h¬¬¬¬ad highly regarded Socrates and that there was a reason a man of his status fell in love with Socrates. It is almost like he was justifying his love to Socrates for the reader and all of Athens. If not for his backstory with the experiences with Socrates, it would be far more difficult to understand the treasures hidden within Socrates.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates was the son of Sophroniscus, an Athenian stonemason and sculptor, and Phaenarete, a midwife. He received a basic Greek education because he wasn’t from a noble family, where he learned his father’s craft at a young age. Socrates worked as a mason for many years before he devoted his life to philosophy. Socrates married Xanthippe, a younger woman, who gave him three sons- Lamprocles, Sophroniscus and Menexenus. There isn’t much known of Xanthippe. Only that she wasn’t happy with Socrates second profession. Philosophy didn’t support his family. Socrates always emphasized the importance of the mind over the relative unimportance of the human body.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is highly debatable how far an individual can truly separate the laws of a state…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The most noticeable comparison between Jesus Christ and Socrates was that the charges against them. They were both seen as an “evil” influence to the townspeople because of their different ways to see life and for their beliefs on religion. Jesus was considered a heretic because he preached monotheism in a polytheistic world. He called himself the messiah, a divine being and the son of God and the Jews saw that as a major offence. The Roman Government did not like that Jesus questioned the oppressiveness and discrimination of the Roman law against people that were considered inferior, as he felt we were all created equal. Socrates was charged with corrupting the youth, as he went around seeing how little most people knew by asking questions. Socrates also worshipped the gods of Sparta, rather than the gods of Athens. Socrates and Jesus generally both drew large crowds when they preached their views (Socrates and Christ).…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Being one of Socrates’ disciples, Plato adopted his philosophy and style of debate, and focused his studies toward the question of virtue and the formation of a noble character. According to Aristotle, Plato developed the foundations of his metaphysics and epistemology by studying the doctrines of Cratylus, and the work of Pythagoras and Parmenides. When Plato met Socrates, however, he had met his definitive teacher.…

    • 2584 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays