Small Claims Trial Essay
I was overwhelmed with excitement, as I was about to witness my first small claims trial in the reputable small claims court located at 7765 Hurontario Street, Brampton, which was repetitively used as a source in the small claims textbook. To my surprise there were two buildings, the large one being the criminal court while the smaller one was the small claims court. These seem to be the main cause of confusion for many people including myself. This is because the address for small claims on our books was actually for the criminal courts instead. I failed to understand why they could not create a way to distinguish them. When I finally arrived at the small claims court, I was enthusiastic to see the endless amount of people
…show more content…
This is interesting as it came from the common law system where judges sat in a royal courts of justice that were established by English Kings in 1066CE. These principles have travelled through history and still applicable to this day. The judge came in well informed and prepared on the case before entering the trail. He was introduced to the plaintiff, Vino Petal, who was represented by a paralegal whereas the defendant, Waseem who was self-represented. The plaintiff was trying to prove breach of contract and fraud. After which the judge declared the case as “a commercial deal gone sour’’. The judge became furious when he had learned that Waseem showed a lack of due diligence as he did not have his small claims court rules. Due diligence is reasonable steps that must be taken in order to satisfy the law. Both parties showed a lack of due diligence that not only caused the judge to become impatient, but also went against the litigants favor. This highlights the significance of Due diligence in the court of law. Yet the absences of it show that you are not only wasting the time of the judge but also disrespecting the court. However the judge had a higher expectation from the paralegal compared to Waseem, who was self-represented. Then judge then said “ Mr. Waseem I am not your attorney but I will state the procedure for you”. As done in small claims
This is interesting as it came from the common law system where judges sat in a royal courts of justice that were established by English Kings in 1066CE. These principles have travelled through history and still applicable to this day. The judge came in well informed and prepared on the case before entering the trail. He was introduced to the plaintiff, Vino Petal, who was represented by a paralegal whereas the defendant, Waseem who was self-represented. The plaintiff was trying to prove breach of contract and fraud. After which the judge declared the case as “a commercial deal gone sour’’. The judge became furious when he had learned that Waseem showed a lack of due diligence as he did not have his small claims court rules. Due diligence is reasonable steps that must be taken in order to satisfy the law. Both parties showed a lack of due diligence that not only caused the judge to become impatient, but also went against the litigants favor. This highlights the significance of Due diligence in the court of law. Yet the absences of it show that you are not only wasting the time of the judge but also disrespecting the court. However the judge had a higher expectation from the paralegal compared to Waseem, who was self-represented. Then judge then said “ Mr. Waseem I am not your attorney but I will state the procedure for you”. As done in small claims