Preview

Richard III comparative study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
962 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Richard III comparative study
Practise Questions
Texts are often a reflection of the society they embody: through awareness of context deeper levels of understanding can be developed and explored. By a comparative study of texts parallels in context can be established and evaluated, with the alternate visual mediums key in enhancing the audience experience. Al Pacino’s “Looking for Richard,” (1996) provides a more coherent view of William Shakespeare’s “Richard III,” (1592), using similarities between texts to accommodate a modern audience. Both texts represent common themes of war, demonstrating the inherent evil of mankind through characterisation, with respective societal influence affecting their portrayal. Shakespeare’s text strongly portrays the presence of propaganda in society, an influence still present in the context of 1996. Through the employment of the visual medium, Al Pacino is capable of displaying these influences to a postmodern audience, demonstrating the similarities in context and purpose.
War is a predominant theme in ‘Richard III,’ the ongoing turmoil between the Lancasters and the Yorks in the War of the Roses the premise for the play. The battle (and defeat of Richard) at Bosworth, is the conclusive decider of the text, ending Richard’s reign as King, and setting the Lancasters back on the throne. Looking for Richard portrays the Battle of Bosworth, the employment of the visual medium altering its depiction. In the play the battle and Richard’s murder is a relatively quick affair, the stage direction, ‘they fight. King Richard III is slain,’ the only orated form of violence. Through use of the visual medium however, Pacino is able to dramatize Richard’s final scene, turning Richard’s murder from a lost fight, into an execution. Pacino’s representation of the battle displays views in society at that time; revealed in the numerous ‘vox pops,’ it is shown that the common public are not very knowledgeable of Shakespeare. By extenuating the battle scene Pacino is able to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How far did Richard III demonstrate the capacity to be a good king 1483-1485? (24 Marks)…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pacino’s docudrama ‘Looking for Richard’ idolises Shakespeare’s key values and ideas intertwining them into the film to associate and connect with a modern audience. Pacino examines Shakespeare’s text, deconstructing and expressing the text giving his own personal opinion and teachings of King Richard III. The subtle modifications of the original text allows Pacino to reach out and grab the audience connecting with modern day Shakespeare, allowing them to realise that Shakespeare is still relevant today. This is highlighted when the cast approaches random public figures asking them about Shakespeare, a man replies, “He’s a great export. ” The random selection and interview of an average man draws the audience to realise the Shakespeare is still culturally valued and important because of the contextual change forcing a modification in values. Pacino creatively adjusts his film to resonate with a modern audience drawing them out to connect with the values and context in a modern…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An examination of the impacts in texts reveals that whilst these concerns may reflect universal human weaknesses, the treatment of these issues in Shakespeare’s historical play King Richard III and Al Pacino’s Looking For Richard, reveals the eternal role that context plays in the presentation of these themes. Shakespeare examines the moral ramifications of the relentless pursuit of power, which reflects the politically unstable period of the 16th century from which he wrote. However, Pacino reappropriates Shakespeare’s depiction of power and deception for his contemporary audience to explicate the enduring nature of these concerns.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet is shot with bright lighting in the 19th-century palace ballroom. Through costuming and lighting, Branagh’s Hamlet immerses the audience. Yet, David Tennant delivers his soliloquy in a dimly lit throne room. The dim lights and simple costuming allow the audience to maintain attention on Hamlet’s internal debate. In both scenes, the costuming, lighting, and camera angles draw in the viewer. Yet, Tennant's Hamlet is able to go a step further and captures the idea that Hamlet is truly debating with himself.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intrinsic to both texts, there is the notion that art is used to directly influence and impact existing historical perceptions. Shakespeare’s “Richard III” explores this idea, using the most influential artistic medium of the time, theatre, to further publicise the ‘Tudor Myth’ perception. On stage, the visual motif of Richard’s appearance as “deformed, unfinished” reflects his moral deficiencies, reinforced by his soliloquys and asides that expose his underlying treachery. He forges a duplicitous role as both director and actor within the play, stating in the opening soliloquy “plots that I have laid, inductions dangerous…” Richard seemingly ‘stage manages’ the entirety of his world, creating a sense of dramatic irony from the juxtaposing of the different “masks” he feigns in contrast to his true intentions; he plays the role of the “grieving” brother, “Christian prince,” etc. As such, Richard’s meta-theatricality engages us on a psychological level that reinforces the perception of the Tudor Myth given not just the heinous nature of his crimes but the “villainous”…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the late fourteenth to mid-sixteenth century, Great Britain underwent massive changes throughout the entire realm. From the new system of deposing kings to religious upheavals, England during this time had a hard time finding peace. During those two hundred years, personal ambition of kings and nobles was the most disruptive to English society, which was exacerbated by the religious break instituted by Henry VIII in 1534.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jane Eyre

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    William Shakespeare’s 16th century historically tragic play, King Richard III and Al Pacino’s 20th century docudrama, Looking for Richard portray parallel themes of war, characterisation of Richard in context and plot. Shakespeare wrote King Richard III during the reign of Elizabeth I and the propaganda during the time supported the Elizabethan monarch. During Looking for Richard’s era, a concept of sheer evil appeared which presented characters whose evil was unmotivated. The issues Shakespeare explored are still experienced in contemporary surrounding, and reflect in Pacino’s text. Both texts explore similar aspects of war, characterisation of Richard in context and plot portraying in different textual forms. Thus, as texts are a reflection of their context, the purpose to connect with their audience remains constant irrespective of context.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chosen Topic: Many directors have staged and filmed conceptualized versions of Shakespeare’s work, hoping to derive new or unexpected meaning from old plays. Does Almereyda’s 21st century interpretation of Hamlet intensify or diminish the play’s “greatness”? Make a strong case, using examples from the film to support your argument.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hamlet Rhetorical Analysis

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In spite of the fact that the plot evokes the implication that it occurred between the close of 16th century and the start of the 17th century, Shakespeare’s Hamlet surpasses the constraints of time and muses upon both the primitive and contemporary man. In the late 16th century in England, people of all classes on the social echelon, with the exception of royals, were able to publicly eyewitness theatre. Audiences craved new plays to assuage their appetites. One of numerous dramatists that capitalized this abundance of opportunity was Shakespeare. Opposed to the modern time, audiences spectated the play to hear it rather than see it. The articulation of the lines and significance of how the story was recited was crucial…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1995 film Richard III follows the plot and script of the original play very closely, but is quite different in its setting. While the play takes place in the 1400s, this film is set in the 1930s. As such, many differences in aesthetic are to be assumed. The characters wear modern clothing and technology is up to date: Men wear suits and ties, women wear modern dresses; rather than horses people rely on cars, trains and planes for transportation; rather than lute players people listen to phonographs; rather than battles being fought with lances, bow and arrows and swords on horseback, soldiers are armed with guns and command tanks. Strangely enough, despite the presence of a Prime Minister in the film there still exists a royal rule, implying that the film is set in a Fascist state. In fact, the garments of the king and his men are reminiscent of Nazi general uniforms.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    could be classified as belonging to an adult male aging from late 20s to late 30s, and post-mortem methods provides an estimate of 30-34 years of age (Science). This fits in with the historical account that Richard III was 32 when he died. By looking at the length of the right femur, Richard III was around 5ft 8 in, which was tall for men during that era (Science). Looking at his spine, which was curved significantly by an angle of 70°-90°, gives Richard III a diagnosis of scoliosis. His specific scoliosis is classified as idiopathic adolescent onset scoliosis (Science). This means the reason for its development is unknown, and the curvature became pronounced after he was 10 years old. His condition would not have prevented him from exercising…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The film Othello by director Oliver Parker, is based on the Shakespearean tragedy based on the insecurities of one man, being played upon leading to his undoing at the hands of the one he most trusts, ?honest Iago?. In this essay, we look at how this age old play is dealt with by the medium of film, reviewing the director?s ability to provide an effect caused by insight into the play?s mechanization and interpretation of such affected by visual mastery. This analysis focuses mainly on techniques and devices used to achieve this and their effect.…

    • 2007 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richmond appears late in the play, in act five scene two [good for setting the context], too perfect as opposed to Richard’s villainy. Richmond is presented in the play as flawless and holy, causing the audience to be unable to see from his point of view, thereby allowing Shakespeare to present Richmond’s purity as a foil to Richard’s villainy [expression here doesn’t make clear your position]. Furthermore, Richmond is a static and flat [good] character who does not change throughout the play while Richard is a complex character with differing layers as he plays different roles in the play and change throughout the entire play. Lastly, parallels can be drawn between Richard and Richmond, from the similarity in name to their introduction and finally their speech to their armies before the battle. [so what is your stand? Understand that in this quote there are two big contentious points – Richmond ONLY to be a foil and Richmond AS much a hero AS Richard a villain.]…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Richard III challenges notions of how history is created and presented. Shakespeare’s play depicts the infamous Richard not only at odds with the other characters, but also fighting for a different interpretation of history. Richard and Margaret function as two characters opposed to each other with regard to history; Richard attempts to cover up the past as Margaret attempts to expose it. However, the creation and acceptance of history is largely predicated on more common figures. In particular the scrivener, a seemingly small side character, becomes an integral figure who creates the documentation of history, cementing the written version as a truth. The scrivener, tasked with the duty to write the documents falsely indicting Hastings at Richard’s request, approaches the audience in Act III, scene 6 and laments his position of falsely creating a legal document construed as truth, and manifests the complicated truth of history. The scrivener’s position as a figure entrusted with written truth is observantly figured against both Richard’s approach to history through his language and the play as a whole–a text figured with propagandistic interests with the Tudor line. The scrivener’s scene, with its focus of documented history, exposes Richard’s verbal tricks and the play’s reliability as a historical document. While critics including Paige Martin Reynolds and Linda Charnes have identified both Richard and Margaret of Anjou as figures who engage with and distort history, lesser characters serve similar vital functions. Overall, Charnes and Reynolds contribute much to the conversation of history within the text and are essential to this particular reading, yet the level that the scrivener as a character works on contributes to the social and formal designs of the history play is not addressed in their essays. Reynolds, in her essay “mourning and Memory in Richard III,” addresses the role of historical construction in…

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays