Preview

Revolutionary Means of Modernization: Marxism, Feminism, & Chinese Nationalism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1606 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Revolutionary Means of Modernization: Marxism, Feminism, & Chinese Nationalism
R.Osmun

KSU/HIST 112

21 April 2009

Revolutionary Means of Modernization

Through the mid-19th century and into the early 20th century, people began to desire change in existing societal structures, which led to movements with revolutionary new ideas. These movements usually involved progressive change and eliminating repression, looking towards ideas established in the Enlightment period for guidance. The goals of the Marxist, Feminist, and Chinese Nationalist movements were similar in the fact that all desired equality, opportunity, and self government.

Marxism, Feminism, and Chinese Nationalism all express the belief that the government should represent the people governed. Marxism stresses the need to eliminate social hierarchies and the turning of power to the Proletariat working class. Feminists desired equal representation in their governments. The Chinese Nationalist movement stressed that the ethnic Han Chinese should be governing themselves. These points are readily proved through prominent readings of movement leaders.

Karl Marx believed that the populous, powerful Proletariat class needed to rise up and equalize the elite Bourgeois class, rather than an elite few to usurp all the benefits of industrialized life. Marx states that communists support every revolutionary movement against existing social structures.[1] He offers his communist call-to-action in the Communist Manifesto. “…their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a communist revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Working men of all countries, unite!”[2] Marx believed that the working class should not be ruled by an elite capitalist class, but rather they should be in control. Another movement centered on one group in a society gaining their rights is the Feminist movement.

The Feminist movement in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marxism and Mao

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. What specific development in Hunan province reinforced Mao’s convictions about the peasantry as a revolutionary force?…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Class in Australia

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Marx argues > distinct hierarchy determined by wealth/education & capacity within society but an overthrow of ruling class > working class (proletariats) can gain upward social mobility > better society.…

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx and Engels wrote the Communist Manifesto to explain the history of class struggles in Europe and how communism was the ultimate form of government meant to bring equality to society and end the oppressive rule of the rising Bourgeoisie class. For Marx, humans are rational beings. But in a bourgeoisie capitalist dominated society, reality has become distorted and diminished a once functioning society. Industrialization has created a society of working class citizens who are manipulated, easily exploited, and oppressed for monetary gains. This is counterintuitive for the advancement of society and a successful government and brings about struggles of class. Therefore Marx argues the working class should be in control of government, because they are the ones ho keep the bourgeoisie rich and the economy running. “Formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat” (Marx 14). Marx argues the average working class citizens are capable of governing the land and distributing wealth evenly amongst the people. Writing is simply not enough he calls for revolution in order to restore peace and end the impoverishment of many…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Marx’s class conflict theory states that the bourgeoisie (or the capitalists) are locked in conflict with the proletariat (the exploited workers). Marx believed that this conflict could only end when the working class united and violently broke free of the “bondage”. Once this happens, society will be classless and people will work according to their abilities, while receiving goods and services according to their needs. Although Marxism does propose revolution, it should not be confused with communism.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unfortunately, this revolution was never initiated by the proletariat like Marx had envisioned. The working men did not unite against the ruling class and failed to bring Marx’s perfect ideology to life. Other leaders were, however, inspired by his writing to create the perfect ideology of Communism. Leaders like Lenin during the Russian Revolution wished to create a socialist society which would ensure equality and egalitarianism for everyone in the country similar to what Marx had attempted. He placed the Bolshevik Party in a position of power to make them responsible for distributing equality. This party was called the Vanguard Party and was supposed to act like the “philosopher king” in Plato’s Republic. Galian Golan explained in his article…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Karl Marx, the struggle between the upper class, the bourgeoisie and the lower class, the proletariat, has always been a constant conflict throughout history. The bourgeoisie controlled all means of production and continuously oppressed the proletariat, which was unfair because the proletariats were the ones doing hard labor, yet the bourgeoisie gained all of the benefits. Marx believed that in order to end this class struggle, class distinctions would need to be eliminated. In order for everybody in society to be considered equal, there could be no private ownership of materials. If private ownership of materials were allowed, then some people would have more things than other people which would create another class and thus another conflict. Therefore, an equalized society would get rid of all conflict. Marxism has been…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In all stories a hero is the one to solve/defeat the problem at hand. For Marx this “hero” is the Proletariat (working class), he describes the oppression of the Proletariat by the Bourgeoisie as a evil that must be destroyed through the socialization of the means of production. “By their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletariat have nothing to lose but their chains.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx supported the previous statement by introducing the idea of “dictatorship of the proletariat” in his book the “The Communist Manifesto”. He most probably used the word “dictatorship” to emphasize the absolute rule of only one class that will automatically destroy the other classes and therefore establish a classless society that would share the same values and interests. So as to achieve it, the bourgeoisie class needs to reach a state of “consciousness” that will free them from their desires of private property. In this way, the “dictatorship” is a form of rule that makes the government just a tool in the hands of the proletariat that is vital to free every person (regardless of class) from his needs and achieve self-satisfaction and self-fulfillment by working towards the common interests of the society, rather than an oppressive regime which suppresses personal freedom (Kolakowski 1978). Accordingly, Stalin is the framework of the Russian Communism in which center is placed the class of the Russian workers. He wanted to unite the people and destroy the differences in the society that resulted in social, economical and political conflicts: “organize the…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rowbotham, Hartmann*, and Ehrenreich each draw on Marx to construct a new socialist-feminist approach to social analysis and political change. What aspect or aspects of Marx’s thought does each find to be most useful? Show how their choices about what to take from Marx shape the political implications of their theories. Whose use of Marx makes the most sense for contemporary feminism(or, if you wish, another contemporary social movement)?…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Towards the late 19th century and in the early 20th century the world was changing at a rapid pace. World War I had a left an enormous hole in Europe’s economy and they were doing everything they could to compensate for their losses. The theme that connects all of these societies is change. Cultures were changing in some places and some were not handling as well as others. Changes were affecting societies in Asia, The Middle East, and South America.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    proletariat (467). Marx except that communism should help the proletariat unite to abolish the rule of the…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They took power from these people and finally the society is divided into two separate classes directly facing each other; bourgeois and proletarians. (The Communist Manifesto, p. 2) Now, according to Karl Marx, it's the time for the proletarians to take power from the bourgeois and create a new world order. In the document, Karl Marx also argued that in the process of doing their job in wiping out the feudal system, bourgeois created the system that will lead to their own collapse, which is full of exploitation and unequal distribution of wealth. (The Communist Manifesto, p. 4) Hence, like every time when there is a strong divide between classes in the society, it is the time for a revolution to occur. It is the necessary step for the society to progress further, and it can only be attained by "the forcibly overthrow of all existing conditions." (The Communist Manifesto, p.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When classifying revolutionary movements of the 20th century it is often customary to try and label the conflict either Left Wing or Right Wing. However, in the cases of Sun Yat-sen and Mao Zedong, neither Left nor Right Wing seems an appropriate label for what their revolutions contained for China. The difference between democratic and anti-democratic is more fitting for the two Chinese revolutionaries. Both Sun and Mao advocated different methods of development to achieve the same goals but caused drastically different results. Sun Yat-sen, who was taught at a young age the Western ways of life, favored a revolutionary movement with democratic aspirations. Conversely, Mao admired Stalinism and the industrial drive of the Soviet Union, and favored moving away from Sun’s democracy to form a Communist government.…

    • 3439 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The roots of the Cultural Revolution date back to the early 1960s. After the catastrophic Great Leap Forward, in which more than 20 million people died, Chairman Mao Zedong decided to take a lessactive role in governing the country. More practical, moderateleaders, such as Vice-Chairman Liu Shaoqi and Premier ZhouEnlai, introduced economic reforms based on individual incentitives. By allowing families to farm their own plots of land, contribution at an effort to revive the battered economy is achievable. Mao detested such policies, as they went against the principles of pure c o m m unism in which he so firmly believed. Nevertheless, China’s economy grew strongly during three particular years, from 1962 to 1965 with the more conservative economic policies in place. At the same time, Mao started to worry that local party officials were taking advantage of their positions to benefit themselves. Rather than resolving such cases internally to preserve the prestige of the Chinese Communist Party, Mao favored open criticism and the involvement of the people to expose and punish the members of the ruling class who disagreed with him; he framed this as a genuine socialist campaign involving the central struggle of the proletariat versus the bourgeousie..…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays