pyschological contract
Journal of Organizational Behavior
J. Organiz. Behav. 24, 537–559 (2003)
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/job.205
Psychological contract development during organizational socialization: adaptation to reality and the role of reciprocity
´
ANS DE VOS1*, DIRK BUYENS2 AND RENE SCHALK3
1
Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, Gent, Belgium
Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School and Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business
Administration, Gent, Belgium
3
Policy and Organization Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
2
Summary
Based on the theoretical framework of newcomer sensemaking this study examines factors associated with changes in newcomers’ psychological contract perceptions during the socialization process. More specifically, two mechanisms are addressed that could explain changes in newcomers’ perceptions of the promises they have exchanged with their employer: (1) unilateral adaptation of perceived promises to reality and (2) adaptation of perceived promises as a function of the reciprocity norm. To test our hypotheses, a four-wave longitudinal study among 333 new hires has been conducted, covering the first year of their employment relationship. Results show that changes in newcomers’ perceptions of the promises they have made to their employer are affected by their perceptions of their own contributions as well as by their perceptions of inducements received from their employer. Changes in newcomers’ perceptions of employer promises are affected by their perceptions of employer inducements received, but the impact of perceived employee contributions is less clear. The data provide limited support for the idea that the adaptation of perceived promises to perceived inducements and contributions occurs to a stronger extent during the encounter stage than during the acquisition stage of socialization. Copyright # 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Introduction
J. Organiz. Behav. 24, 537–559 (2003)
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/job.205
Psychological contract development during organizational socialization: adaptation to reality and the role of reciprocity
´
ANS DE VOS1*, DIRK BUYENS2 AND RENE SCHALK3
1
Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, Gent, Belgium
Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School and Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business
Administration, Gent, Belgium
3
Policy and Organization Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
2
Summary
Based on the theoretical framework of newcomer sensemaking this study examines factors associated with changes in newcomers’ psychological contract perceptions during the socialization process. More specifically, two mechanisms are addressed that could explain changes in newcomers’ perceptions of the promises they have exchanged with their employer: (1) unilateral adaptation of perceived promises to reality and (2) adaptation of perceived promises as a function of the reciprocity norm. To test our hypotheses, a four-wave longitudinal study among 333 new hires has been conducted, covering the first year of their employment relationship. Results show that changes in newcomers’ perceptions of the promises they have made to their employer are affected by their perceptions of their own contributions as well as by their perceptions of inducements received from their employer. Changes in newcomers’ perceptions of employer promises are affected by their perceptions of employer inducements received, but the impact of perceived employee contributions is less clear. The data provide limited support for the idea that the adaptation of perceived promises to perceived inducements and contributions occurs to a stronger extent during the encounter stage than during the acquisition stage of socialization. Copyright # 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Introduction
References: Anderson, N., & Thomas, H. D. C. (1996). Work group socialization. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work groups (pp Arbucle, J. L. (1999). AMOS 4.1. Chicaco, IL: SmallWaters. Bauer, T. N., Morrison, E., & Callister, R. (1998). Organizational socialization: a review and directions for future research Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral science (2nd edn) Conway, N., & Briner, R. (2002). A daily diary study of affective responses to psychological contract breach and exceeded promises Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for the behavioral sciences. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., & Kessler, I. (1998). The psychological contract in the UK public sector: employer and employee obligations and contract fulfillment Coyle-Shapiro, J., & Kessler, I. (2000). Exploring employee reciprocity through the lens of the psychological contract Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Fornell, C., & Larcker, F. D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors Freese, C., & Schalk, R. (1996). Implications of differences in psychological contracts for human resource management Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178. Guest, D., & Conway, N. (1997). Employee motivation and the psychological contract (Issues in People Management No Guest, D., & Conway, N. (1998). Fairness at work and the psychological contract (Issues in People Management). Heath, C., Knez, M., & Camerer, C. (1993). The strategic management of the entitlement process in the employment relationship Herriot, P., Manning, W. E. G., & Kidd, J. M. (1997). The content of the psychological contract. British Journal of Management, 8, 151–162. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behaviour: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. J. Organiz. Behav. 24, 537–559 (2003) 558 Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press. Lester, S. W., Turnley, W. H., Bloodgood, J. M., & Bolino, M. C. (2002). Not seeing eye to eye: differences in supervisor and subordinate perceptions of and attributions for psychological contract breach Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and sense-making: what newcomers experience and how they cope in unfamiliar organisational settings Meyer, J., Bobocel, R., & Allen, N. (1991). Development of organizational commutment during the first year of employment: a longitudinal study of pre- and post-entry influences Millward, L. J., & Brewerton, P. M. (2000). Psychological contracts: employee relations for the twenty-first century? In C Morrison, E. (1993a). A longitudinal study of the effects of information seeking on newcomer socialization. Morrison, E. (1993b). Newcomer information seeking: exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 557–589. Nelson, D. L., Quick, J. C., & Joplin, J. R. (1991). Psychological contracting and newcomer socialization. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 55–72. Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574–599. Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M. S., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: a longitudinal study Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: the effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach and violation: a longitudinal study Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121–139. Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: a study of psychological contracts Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements Rousseau, D. M. (1998). The psychological contract inventory. Technical Report, CCER, Heinz School of Public Policy, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: the building blocks of the psychological contract. Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Organizational socialization: making sense of the past and present as a prologue for the future Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Schalk, R., & Freese, L. (1997). New facets of commitment in response to organizational change: research trends and the Dutch experience Schein, E. H. (1978). Career dynamics: Matching individual and organizational needs. Reading, MA: AddisonWesley. Shore, L. M., & Tetrick, L. E. (1994). The psychological contract as an explanatory framework in the employment relationship Thomas, H. D. C., & Anderson, N. (1998). Changes in newcomers’ psychological contracts during organizational socialization: a study of British recruits entering the British Army Turnley, W. H., Bolino, M. C., Lester, S. W., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2003). The impact of psychological contract fulfillment on the performance of in-role and organizational citizenship behaviors Turnley, W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (1999). The impact of psychological contract violations on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect Turnley, W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2000). Re-examining the effects of psychological contract violations: unmet