Preview

Peter Smythe V Thomas

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2716 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Peter Smythe V Thomas
Question 1: In what court was the case heard?
The case was heard in the New South Wales Supreme Court under the jurisdiction of the equity division.
Question 2: Name the judge and explain his title at the time this case was heard.
The active judge, Justice Rein was seeing this case. At present his Honour Nigel Geoffrey Rein is an admiralty list judge of the supreme courts equity division. (Supreme court of New South Wales, 2013) However, at the time the case of Peter Smythe v Vincent Thomas [2007] NSWSC 844 (3 August 2007), Justice Rein was a district court judge as an acting chief justice. It was not until May 5th 2008 that he was sworn in as a judge of the supreme court. (Supreme Court New South Wales, 2008) In the years that Rein was a district judge,
…show more content…
Specific performance is a court ordered remedy in response to a breach in contract. (Clark, 2010) The remedy enforces the breaching party to carry out the contract originally agreed. The specific performance was appropriate in this case as the judge found that a binding contract had been formed between the parties, a specific performance to enforce the contract should be put into effect. Because the ebay auction has qualities both similar and different from a traditional auction, it was found that a contract may exist between vendor and ebay, between ebay and buyer and between vendor and buyer.
The justice also found that the defendants claim to only have created an invitation to treat was unjustified on the grounds that the bid met the time period, the minimum bid, the plaintiff was the highest bidder and didn 't impose a qualification on the bid. It is for these reasons that the judge found a binding contract between the buyer and vendor and henceforth implemented an order for specific performance, instructing the contract to be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Shaw V Thomas

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Benic v New South Wales [2010] NSWSC 1039 the risk of harm was the plaintiff, a police officer, suffering psychiatric injury as a result of receiving a threat to his life in the course of his work. The alleged breach was the failure to provide prompt and appropriate psychological or psychiatric assistance. The court noted that whether the risk was not insignificant was to be analysed from the perspective of the defendant and was to be prospective: at [411]. The evidence was that the Commissioner of Police had taken a series of steps to address stress, including psychiatric illness, amongst police officers. This evidence satisfied Garling J that the risk of psychiatric illness from the defendant’s perspective was not insignificant: at [414]. It was reasoned that the risk of psychiatric harm:…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Legal Citation: R v Fraser [2003] NSWSC 965 and R v Fraser [2004] NSWSC 53…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The history of the case (Who won at trial court? Who won at the lower appellate level? Who won in this decision?)…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    9. What distinction does the Court make between the cases of Tinker v. Des Moines and Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier?…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    eng rwryw efhe gw gweth

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    CLR 447
 Handley v Snoid (1981) 4 TPR 361 
Johnson v Buttress (1936) 56 CLR 113
 Astley v Austrust (1999) 161 ALR 155
G. H. Myers v Brent Cross Service Co. (1934) 1 KB 46 Australian Knitting Mills Ltd v Grant (1936) 50 CLR 387 Beale v Taylor (1967) 1 WLR 1193 
Qanstruct Pty Ltd v Bongiorno Ltd (1993) 113 ALR 667 Director of Consumer Affairs of Victoria v AAPT Ltd…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    EEOC v Target

    • 744 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1) What were the legal issues in this case? What did the appeals court decide?…

    • 744 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contract memorandum

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jack sues Teri in municipal court, asking for specific performance in accordance with the original deal. Teri argues that, although specific performance is usually appropriate in land sales contract cases, the judge has the discretion to deny specific performance.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal citation of the case: Regina v Bilal Skaf; Regina v Mohammed Skaf [2006] NSWSC 394, 28 July 2006 AND amendment to this decision with the appeal: R v Skaf & Skaf [2008] NSWCCA 303, 17 December 2008…

    • 2795 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Marshall

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wood, Gordon. “The Father of the Court.” New Republic (1997): 38-41. Web. 12 June 2012.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Tyranny of the Billable Hour

    • 2628 Words
    • 11 Pages

    [ 15 ]. FindLaw Australia, Cut Costs: Chief Justice Tells Lawyers (3 February 2004) FindLaw Australia…

    • 2628 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shah V Hsbc

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Review the decision in the case of Shah v. HSBC (2012) and evaluate the implications of the decision for regulated financial services firms. In particular:…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Trial Process

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The criminal trial process is a vital part of the criminal justice system in NSW as it plays a fundamental role in achieving justice, by determining the innocence or guilt of an offender. Yet, despite the criminal trial process still having many complex issues that remove it of achieving its full means of justice, the process has stood the test of time and lasted for more than two centuries. It aims at lawfully and justly providing victims, offenders and society with the rights of a fair trial. The hierarchies of courts play a crucial role in effectuating justice for the community. The courts jurisdiction is the extent of the court’s authority and is often determined by the hierarchy. The lowest form of court is the Local Court. The Local Court Act 1982 (NSW) outlines the offences that are heard in this court. They are less serious crimes, where matters are tried summarily, but are also the location for bail and committal hearings, where police play a prominent role in achieving justice. The Intermediate and High Courts handle indictable crimes as well as appeals from lower courts. It is in these courts that a decision made sets a doctrine of precedent. The court hierarchy is a major part of the criminal trial process as it allows appeals and precedents to flow easily. It attempts to ensure consistency between judicial decisions, as well as limit the discretion on most judicial verdicts. Appeals and precedents fundamentally ensure efficiency and the effectiveness of achieving justice, but despite them being an effective measure in achieving justice, there are still cheaper and more cost-efficient methods, such as YJC, and Circle Sentencing, that can fulfill the same outcome. The cornerstone of Australia’s criminal trial process is the Adversary System. This refers to the legal procedure where two opposing sides argue a case before an independent, third party eg.…

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Counsel for the defendant suggested that the decision in Ballina Shire Council v Ringland (1994) 33 NSWLR 680 applied to this case and meant that the NSW Aboriginal Land Council could not sue for defamation. The decision was made by Chief Justice Gleeson and President Kirby that a council elected under the Local Government Act 1919 does not have sufficient powers or rights to make a claim for defamation.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case from the Victorian era, Montefiore had made an offer to buy shares in the Ramsgate Victoria Hotel for a particular price. The offer was accepted six months after this, and by then, the value of the shares in the claimant company were worth much less. The offer had never been withdrawn, but Montefiore said it was too late and would not go ahead with the sale. The claimant went to court to obtain an order of ‘specific performance’ – a court order forcing the other party to perform a binding contract. The court held the offer lapsed after a ‘reasonable time’ and so the order was not granted. In determining ‘reasonable’, the courts will look at the subject matter of the contract (if the goods are perishable, or if there is some clear, time-sensitive element, such as the Olympics), what normally happens in that trade and the custom and practice. Offers for sale of shares must be quick, whereas contracts for land might be longer.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cases on Contract

    • 4912 Words
    • 20 Pages

    The defendant made the highest bid for the plaintiff's goods at an auction sale, but he withdrew his bid before the fall of the auctioneer's hammer. It was held that the defendant was not bound to purchase the goods. His bid amounted to an offer which he was entitled to withdraw at any time before the auctioneer signified acceptance by knocking down the hammer. Note: The common law rule laid down in this case has now been codified in s57(2) Sale of Goods Act 1979.…

    • 4912 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays