Preview

Mr Josh Gallagher

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
823 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mr Josh Gallagher
Examine the reasons for changes in the patterns of marriage and cohabitation in the last 40 years or so:

There are many reason for changes in the patterns of marriage and cohabitation due to many significant social attitude changes such as secularisation, there are also many more that affect marriage and cohabitation but one that has affected the pattern mostly is feminism, this is shown in a survey that shows in the last 40 years the number of marriages has dropped enormously by up to one hundred thousand marriages and is still declining whereas the cohabitation rate has increased dramatically by 50%. These outline one of the many reasons for changing patterns in marriage and cohabitation.

One of the many reasons for the changes in the patterns of marriage and cohabitation is the changing social attitudes, over the last 40 years social attitudes towards marriage and cohabitation have changed dramatically which has had a massive effect on how marriage and cohabitation is looked at by people in today’s society, because of this change in social attitudes marriage isn’t looked at as compulsory as it was 40 years ago as attitudes have changed which has led to the increase in cohabitation and also it becoming acceptable. There has been a recent data collection which shows how marriage has dropped due to the changes in social attitudes; the number of marriages taking place in England and Wales per year has been in decline since the early 70s, decreasing from 404,734 in 1971 to just 232,443 in 2009. There has been a significant trend to where there are more cohabiting couples, the number of opposite sex cohabiting couples has increased, from 1.5 million in 1996 to 2.9 million in 2012. The number of dependent children living in these opposite sex cohabiting couple families also increased, doubling from 0.9 million to 1.8 million in the same period. This shows how social attitudes has effected the changes in the patterns of marriage and cohabitation, this is shown

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Critically assess the view that an increase in the divorce rate in 1980’s was due to changes in the law. (* - 25 minutes)…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    At the beginning of the essay Neil explains the social changes that have occurred in the last few decades showing the stark rise of “unmarried –partner households.” He claims that…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Identify and explain two reasons for the increase in cohabitation in the contemporary UK (17)…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the past, traditionally families have mostly been the ‘traditional nuclear family’ made up of a married man and woman and at least one child. However there has recently been a decline in the amount of traditional nuclear families and an increase in the amount of diverse families. There are now less people following the traditional view that the nuclear family is the ‘normal’ way to live. The diverse families now include families such as, lone parent families, reconstituted family, extended family, lone person households, cohabiting couples and same sex couples. In this essay I will discuss the view that the traditional nuclear family has decline as a result of the growth of family diversity and the reasons why people are no longer following past tradition. Cohabitatiion is an arrangement where two people who is not married live together in an intimate relationship, particularly an emotionally and/or sexually intimate one, on a long-term or permanent basis. Before 1970, cohabitation was illegal in certain countries e.g. America. Due to a change in the law, Cohabitation is now a common pattern among people around the world, as well as sex/birth outside of marriage, leaving at least 50% to 60% of coupless cohabitating, starting from the late 1990âs. This leads to the amount of traditional nuclear families decreasing as people want to live in companionship as nearly half the amount of marriages end in divorce, also cohabiting is an easier way as its much cheaper and doesnt cause much hassle. The New Right see the decline of the traditional nuclear family and the growth of family diversity as negative trends in modern society.…

    • 757 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1950's Marriage Decline

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The average number of marriages has declined since the 1950’s for various reasons that scholars have tried to explain through their research (Vanorman & Scommegna, 2016). Even with the legalization of same sex marriage, there has been a decline in the number of married adults in the United States. In 1960, about three-quarters of all American adults were married, compared to 2014 where the number had decreased to about half of all American adults being married (Vanorman & Scommegna, 2016). The United States’s marriage trend has been influenced by factors such as cohabitation, delayed marriage, an increase in divorce with a decrease in remarriage, and the increase of having children out of wedlock (Vanorman & Scommegna, 2016).…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The patterns of marriage, divorce and cohabitation over the past 40 years has varied quite significantly. In 1972, the highest ever number of couples (480,000) since the Second World War got married. Now, obviously there is a reason for this. According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), this was due to the baby boom generation of the 1950s reaching marriageable age and these people choosing to marry at a younger age compared with previous generations.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Turner, R. “Rising Prevalence of Cohabitation In United States May have Partially Offset Decline in Marriage Rates.” Family Planning Perspectives 22.2 (1990): 90-91. CINAHL with Full Text. Web. 1 Oct. 2012…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marriage affect many families, the government has a number of laws to control people behaviour inside marriages for example marriages must be monogamous (You can only be married to one person at a time) Governments tend to encourage marriage as they believe the nuclear family is the ideal environment to bring up children, couples receive tax credits and other benefits this also discourages divorce, Marxists would believe that this is the governments way of supporting capitalism, by encouraging people to marry it means they remain a productive asset that they can continue to exploit. The new right would agree that the nuclear family is the best place to bring up a family but would not want to give tax credits or any other financial encouragement as they believe that its best to keep out of peoples affairs. Feminists would feel this is another way of oppressing women, by using financial means to discourage divorce the women may feel as though they are trapped in the relationship especially if they have to support outside the family.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marriage has changed dramatically over time in the many years it has been around. What do think Marriage was like 100 years ago? The article, “American Marriage in Transition”, describes how many different types of marriage there are and how people have changed their view on it. Andrew Cherlin (the sociologist of the article) does a great job going in depth explaining American marriage. He arranges the different marriages in three different categories; Institutionalized which was the earliest type of marriage, then Companionship around World War II, and currently we are considered Individualized.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason is changing social attitudes. Religion regarded cohabitation as ‘living in sin’, but today there is less shame attached to it. Barlow et al found increasing acceptance of cohabitation. This shows that the change in religions social attitude, cohabitation is accepted more, leading to an increase in cohabitation. Some people prefer love that focuses of on intimacy, closeness and emotion rather than the duties of marriage. Giddens argues that there has been a trend towards confluent love. This love focuses on the intimacy, closeness and emotion of a relationship, rather than the feelings of obligation and duty that is in vows at marriage. When a marriage no longer has confluent love, the relationship is likely to end. This shows that monogamy may start being replaced by serial monogamy, in which cohabitation is most suited to. However, the ONS found that 60% of cohabiting couples will eventually end in marriage showing that monogamy can often replace serial monogamy. There is less pressure to follow traditional norms and values. Beck and Beck-Gernshiem argue that individualism has led to changing attitudes towards cohabitation and marriage. There is less pressure to follow the norms and values around love and relationships set by family, religion or culture. This shows that the change in attitudes has led to people making their own decision about whether they marry or cohabitate. The acceptance of sex outside marriage has made it more likely that cohabitation will occur. Allan and Crow argue that effective contraception has made it possible for partners to cohabit without fear of pregnancy. This alongside the acceptance of sex before marriage means cohabitation without marriage is likely to occur. This shows that the change in social attitudes towards sex outside of marriage has led to an increase in cohabitation.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cohabitation has become more widely acceptable in the United States and for some couples it has replaced the idea or desire for marriage. Lamanna, Riedmann, and Stewart (2015) report, “in the early twentieth century, living together outside of marriage was illegal in every state and relatively uncommon” (p. 142). But, times have changed and now more than “7.6 million U.S. heterosexual couples cohabit” (Lamanna et al., p.142). Couples live together without getting married for several reasons such as convenience, companionship, and compatibility. Meg Jay, a writer for the New York Times, and author of, The Downside of Cohabitation Before Marriage (2012), pointed out “the majority of young adults in their 20’s will live with a romantic partner…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The rise of the divorce rate seems to be due to the lack of commitment or understanding of love and longevity in a marriage. Cohabitation can be defined as an arrangement whereby two people decide to live together on a long term or permanent basis in an emotionally and /or sexually intimate relationship (Brannon 2008). Cohabitation is seen as the best way to understand a prospective mate in terms of living and financial stability. Also many couples tend to “slip” into this arrangement without much decision making about it being long term, but tend to just “live in the moment”. The cohabitation of couples whether they be heterosexual or homosexual seems to lack the sense of commitment needed to ensure the lasting traits of a marriage. It seems that although newly married couples lack the same principles, the majority of these couples were cohabitating before the final decision to get married. Despite the increase in cohabitation, the divorce rate has increased rapidly due to the lack of commitment and understanding between the two partners. The difference in views between men and women may be due to the biological differences discovered in prenatal development. The psychological aspect creates the lack of commitment due to loss of financial and emotional stability during cohabitation and thought of future marriage for men, whereas women are keen to having close relationships and diving “head first” into long term relationships and hope for the best. Cohabitation has its positive as well as negative effects on the gender identity of men and women and their basis of marriage as well as the divorce rate increasing.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In marital equality, the author would intuitively expect marriages preceded by cohabitation to be more stable than those not preceded by cohabitation. However, cohabitation negatively influences the quality and longevity of marriages. People who living together generally have individualistic attitudes that make them less committed to marital union and more likely to seek divorce in response to marital problems. It is because it emphasizes individual needs and demonstrates that there are alternatives to marriage. In gender quality, cohabitation is often perceived as a trial marriage, women may select men who are willing to share domestic work. Although cohabitors profess more liberal gender attitudes, the reality is a different matter. Those children live in a cohabitation household are stresses the importance of understanding the effects. Cohabitating household have fewer economic resources than married household. Moreover, children in cohabitating households are likely to experience family instability because many cohabitation relationships terminate.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Living Together Unmarried

    • 4422 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Today, cohabitation is a common pattern among people in the Western world. “More than two-thirds of married couples say that they lived together before getting married. In 1994, there were 3.7 million cohabiting couples” (Wikipedia, n.d.). This is a far cry from a few decades ago. “Before 1970, cohabitation was illegal. Living together outside of marriage was uncommon, but by the late 1990s at least 50% to 60% of couples lived together premaritally. According to the…

    • 4422 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    FAMILY LIFE IN BRITAIN

    • 3234 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In the past ,people got married and stayed married .Divorce was very difficult , expensive and took a long time .Today people’s views on marriage are changing .Many couples ,mostly in their twenties or thirties ,live together (cohabit) without getting married .Only about 60 per cent of these couples will eventually get married.…

    • 3234 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays