Preview

Moral Relativism In The Island

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
999 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Moral Relativism In The Island
Moral relativism is an ethical theory that refers to the concept that there is more than one correct moral judgment. The moral judgments are either correct or incorrect only relative to some specific standpoint. This does not mean that one standpoint is more privileged than any other standpoint. This comes from the idea that cultures from around the world tend to show different moral values; there are no general moral values that everyone in the world shares, and no one should push their own moral judgments onto another person’s or cultures beliefs that are different from their own. The truth or falsity of moral judgments is not universal. In the movie, The Island, Dr. Merrick believes that what he is doing is morally acceptable because he …show more content…
If an action is done, and the actions are good, but the end result isn’t necessarily good, the morality of the action is still good. It is the thoughts and motives behind an action that counts. The highest purpose for every individual is survival and the fulfillment of happiness. Duties are actions that are sincerely good when they are done for duty alone, actions that are judged based on the maxim that served their motivation. The categorical imperative, which derives from deontology, commands that you treat yourself and others as ends in themselves and that a person should act in such a way that they would want the maxim of their action to be universal …show more content…
Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism in that the action is only morally right or wrong based on its consequences. The actions that lead up to the end result do not matter, as long as the result is good and promotes happiness. Utilitarianism promotes selflessness and believes in ‘the greatest good for the greatest number’, which refers to promoting pleasure for the most people. Utilitarianism claims that the good we ought to maximize is the universal good for all rational beings, which is morally right. However, if we fail to maximize the good result, we are considered morally wrong. Lincoln Six-Echo is an example of utilitarianism as well. He breaks the rules, hurts some people during fights, and risks his life to go to the outside world to save all of the clones in the facility. Although some actions were bad, the result of liberating the clones is good. He shows selfless characteristics and displays the notion of ‘the greatest good for the greatest number’ while in the outside world. He thought that risking his one life to find out answers, would bring the greatest happiness to the most amount of people, which makes his actions morally

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ethical relativism is a concept in which most simple minded individuals adhere to. According to definition in the chapter, ethical relativism is the normative theory that what is right is what the culture or individual says is right. Shaw argues that it is not very plausible to say that ethical relativism is determined by what a person thinks is right and wrong. He gives reason that it “collapses the distinction between thinking something is right and it’s actually being right.” Ethical relativism may be justified occasionally. William H. Shaw examines ethical relativism by providing comprehensive examples on why relativism is a weak method in gaining morals.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarianism is the theory in which the good of ones act is measure by maximizing the good for as many people as possible. Therefore the action is good if it leads to happiness for and wrong if it leads to unhappiness to the for a lot of people…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism or the greatest happiness principle, is mainly characterized by happiness and consequentialism. The measure of good and evil is balanced between individual 's happiness and the happiness of the community. (Sommers & Sommers, 2013) If you treat others how you wish to be treated, you are acting in the greater good for the most amounts of people, and in doing so, you are acting with morals. To act selfishly, you are acting morally wrong. This theory relies on producing the greatest amount of happiness. (Sommers & Sommers, 2013)…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people are lead to adopt Ethical Relativism because they believe that it justifies their view that one ought to be tolerant of the different behavior of people in other cultures. However, Ethical Relativism does not really justify tolerance at all. All around the world, there are different types of cultures, which have different ethical values that will be correct according to their cultures. Nevertheless, some people might argue about different cultures that have different moral codes that they can not accept; examples: polygamy and infanticide. On the other hand, Ethical Relativism proposes that we can stop the criticism and be more tolerant with other cultures. To illustrate, we could no longer say that custom of other societies…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral relativism is one’s perception of what is acknowledged to be morally just or unjust depending on accepted demeanor. Certain behaviors and manners that a specific culture may consider to be acceptable, another culture may consider to be unethical. In such an instance, neither one of the cultures would be incorrect. Morals are culturally defined in that it originates from the root as to what is considered socially acceptable.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral Relativism is the thought that the moral beliefs held by individuals is influenced and dependent on the culture in which they live in considers tolerable. Hence, what is considered morally appropriate in a single society perhaps is perceived as immoral in a different society. In actuality they both maybe right as they have distinct creators resulting in different laws, diversity, and possibly religious views of each other. Ruth Benedict defends the theory of moral relativism in her article A Defense of Moral Relativism from The Journal of General Psychology. In contrast, William B. Irvine author of Confronting Relativism feels in a few swift examples people can be talked out of their views on moral…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral relativism did not become a prominent topic in philosophy or elsewhere until the 20th century. Moral relativism is the making of an excuse for the action done. Behaviors should not be dismissed under certain circumstances. Moral relativism is dangerous and illogical which can be seen through murders, abortion, and lying.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Relativism is the idea that one's beliefs and values are understood in terms of one's society, culture, or even one's own individual values. You may disagree with someone and believe your view is superior, relative to you as an individual; more often, relativism is described in terms of the values of the community in which one lives. The view of ethical relativism regards values as determined by one's own ethical standards, often those provided by one's own culture and background. Rather than insisting that there are moral absolutes, moral claims must be interpreted in terms of how they reflect a person's viewpoint; moral claims are then said to be "right in a given culture" or "wrong for a given society." Perhaps one person lives in a culture where having a sexual relationship outside of marriage is regarded as one of the worst things a person can do; in this culture a person engaging in extramarital sex may be punished or even forced to leave. But another culture might have a considerably different…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral relativism is the concept that people’s moral judgements only go as far a ones persons standpoint in a matter. Also, one person’s view on a particular subject carries no extra weight than another person. My thesis statement is inner judgements, moral disagreements, and science are what defend and define moral relativism. Inner judgements are critiques about a persons particular behaviour and what they should or should not have done. Judgements include labels to outline a persons behaviour or lifestyle.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In other words, people should do a right thing for all rational beings and in any particular situations. In addition, Kant says that moral principles should not trust empirical date and evidence to determine moral judgements. Kant says that actions have true moral worth when the action must be logically consistent and free from internal conflicts. His categorical imperative says that "we should always act in such a way that we can will the maxim of our action to become a universal law." He also avoids hypothetical prescription which is you should do if you desire to achieve your goal.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethical Relativism

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ethical relativism is an idea that our ethical values aren’t set in stone. They are determined by who we are, where we live, what century we were born in, or what part of the world we are located. Certainly, those people who live now in the year 2009 would not agree with the practices of slavery that were widely used in the 1800’s. Even more than in the past, we can we see this across the map. In Africa, slaves are still used for hard labor and paid small if any wages at all. Although, the United States knows about these practices, they do not agree with them and do not use slavery as a means of labor. In this discussion about ethical relativism, we will also discuss cultural, moral relativism. Ethical relativism is used all across the board to make decisions around the world. The good and bad must be weighed in according to the situation.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Moral Argument

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant said your moral duty is to do what is right intrinsically moral and good. The wrong thing is to do what is good because it makes you feel good, this feeling of ‘self-satisfaction’ is not necessary.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Either/Or Outlook Analysis

    • 2414 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Moral relativism is a philosophy that states there is no absolute moral law that governs all people. Moral laws would apply in areas of individual moral practice. This means that, no one law exists to govern all societies. Therefore what is considered as morally correct in one society may be deemed incorrect in another, in other words “you have your own way, I have my own way” this is so because the right way does not exist and everyone sees things differently. It is only seen as right in your way as an individual.…

    • 2414 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral relativism is the view that standards, morality, and positions of right and wrong are culturally based. This meaning that a person’s ancestry, religion, or any other factor could greatly affect his/her own views of what is right or wrong. Furthermore, it has been accepted as a moral philosophy of a society, while others think of it as a misconception. While they may have their own opinions, moral relativism is an idea that is very plausible. Although while viewing this idea, there is one main concern brought up by many. Moral relativism brings about evil, chaos, and even arguments.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Then there is ethical relativism. Here, it denies that there is one universal moral standard. Like the name, this view implies that the society that a person comes from determines the correct morals that the person abides by. If the society of a person accepts the actions of that person, then that act is morally right. Therefore, because people come from many different places, everyone should just follow the morality of the place in which they come from. Therefore, the morality of one place may be very different then the moralities of another place.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays