Preview

Margaret Lundberg Eating Green Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1009 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Margaret Lundberg Eating Green Analysis
I'm Hungry: What Is Best For You and the Environment Margaret Lundberg's essay "Eating Green" delivers the message that the way people eat is how they affect the planet. Lundberg has a very strong argument that the meat industry is the "Largest source of global warming" (Lundberg, 482) and if everyone were to become vegetarians the world be a healthier place. For everyone to become a vegetarian would be a lot to ask; however, Americans love for meat has affected the environment and the personal health of Americans. Could Americans celebrate July 4th, Memorial Day, or Labor Day without hamburgers and hotdogs? Could Thanksgiving happen without a turkey on every table? Is it feasible to have an Easter dinner without ham? Most Americans would be at loss of what to put on their menus if they were told that no meat was allowed. Besides needing meat for the holidays, Americans need a daily fast food fix as well. In place of packing a lunch …show more content…
These animals are born and raised in a warehouse style environment. Instead of grazing in pastures, they are feed corn which allows them to be fully mature for slaughter between fourteen to sixteen months. However, cattle raised on a free-range ranch take four to five years to mature. Also, feeding cows corn gives them gas, which makes them belch methane. Methane is 23% more potent at trapping heat than carbon dioxide . Two-thirds of the manmade nitrous oxide comes from livestock manure. These gases contribute to the Greenhouse effect (Lundberg, 483). Dues to the poor conditions that these animals live in, nineteen million pounds of antibiotics are produced each year to keep them healthy. The total amount of antibiotics produced by America per year is only 24 million pounds, this means that only 5 million pounds are for human consumption (Lundberg,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bill McKibben’s essay “The Only Way to Have a Cow” establishes a sense of comfort as his approach to the meat eating controversy is superbly logical. The current industrial approach to livestock has birthed an issue pertaining to the sustainability and healthy feeding of our lives. Yet there is another problem in relation to our consumption, which tends to be overlooked. If the pricing of meat reflected in the damage done to our environments, feedlot beef would cost more than grass-fed beef both financially and environmentally. It is the rapid, inhumane dietary feeding of the cow which is insulting, not the consumption of it, and taking no responsibility for the run-off is an offense to the earth and it’s inhabitants. These costs alone are part of the reasoning for the current system which is inefficient and uneconomically feasible. The…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mankind differentiates itself from other species in its willingness to exhaust its environment in order to satisfy its immediate needs of the essential components: food and water. In order to satisfy the demands of an ever-increasing global population, we rely on an international, industrial food system. When it comes to global warming we think about how climate change will impact farming, but not how farming will impact climate change. The impact of the food system on global warming is enormous. It accounts for roughly one-third of the human-caused global warming effect (Lappé 854). Further aggravating the situation, the food we consume is processed leaving it with fewer nutrients and proteins. Anna Lappé in the essay “The Climate Crisis at the End of Our Fork” and Michael Pollan in the essay “Why Bother?” explain the ongoing…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The consumption of meat is a better or dietary option then vegetarianism. Not only does it have added health benefits that vegetarians don’t receive. It is also a easier harvest to produce. Author Barbara Kingsolver writes about the importance of livestock harvests and how the resources for animal harvests are much smaller than the resources for vegetable harvests. In her essay you can’t run away on harvest day she also talks about the geographical locations that can’t grow vegetables and the native people who can only survive on the harvest of livestock. David Biello talks about the resources that go into agriculture and the negative affects like deforestation or wasted produce in his essay will organic food fail to feed the world.’…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A graph in an environmental magazine illustrates the number of greenhouse gas emitted with most of the greenhouse gas emissions coming from production, not transport, as most people would think (Source D). This graph illustrates, contrary to common perception, that most of the greenhouse gases produced are dependent on the how the food was produced, rather than how the food was shipped. Therefore, eating locally would not necessarily save the earth from much greenhouse gas emissions. Similarly, James McWilliams argues that “New Zealand lamb is raised on pastures with a small carbon footprint, whereas most English lamb is produced under intensive factory-like conditions with a big carbon footprint” (Source C). McWilliams’s statement illustrates how buying local foods can be harmful to the environment. He argues that if a British person were to buy a locally raised lamb that it would emit more carbon emissions than a New Zealand raised lamb that was transported to the United Kingdom, due the large difference in carbon emissions from variants in production methods. Locally grown foods, contrary to general belief, are not necessarily more environmentally friendly than mass produced foods in supermarkets. This is illustrated by the fact that foods create more greenhouse gases in production than in transportation.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * The way we eat today causes cruelty to animals, demands high levels of energy and water usage, contributes to global warming, limits our compassion, and is controlled by the most powerful people on the planet.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Vegetarian Myth, written by author Lierre Keith, tackles the ever-heated question: To eat animal products or not to eat animal products? I add the word “products,” after animal because the book should more properly be called the vegan myth. As a former vegan of over twenty years Keith comes from a place of experience, or as she might have it, a bitter experience. Feeling betrayed, in denial, and physically ill from her vegan years, she has made it her goal to reveal the truth and put to rest the Vegetarian notion that abstaining from animal products is the righteous path that is morally correct, will feed the hungry, and lead to greater nutrition. Chapter one, titled “Why This Book” will be the focus of this analysis because it gives an appropriate introduction to Keith’s…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    People tend to pay as much attention to food as they do brushing their teeth. I urge you, however, to take a step back, slow down, and really think about the food you eat. Eating is a complex thing. It may surprise you. And when you actually think about eating, you will eventually come to think about eating meat. This is no accident, meat has it's pull on humanity. And on our world. The choices we make matter. According to the best-selling author Jonathan Safran Foer, eating the meat we know "is certainly the single worst thing that humans can do to the environment"(457). Foer has been recognized by Rolling Stones Magazine and Esquire for his many accomplishments. In one of his works, "Against Meat", Foer covers the relationship of meat and…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Some people become vegetarians after realizing the devastation that the meat industry is having on the environment.” (Vegetarian Times)…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “The Carnivore’s Dilemma”, an essay by Nicolette Hanh Niman, incorporates rhetorical elements, such as logos, ethos, and rhetorical questions, in an attempt to convince the audience that meat itself is not the root of global warming. Written from a rancher’s point of view, the essay relies on studies and logic to prove itself. Niman starts out with a short acknowledgement that the meat industry has a hand in the increasingly noticeable global climate change. She then quickly changes gears, stating that the studies that show the meat industry is a major player in global warming only take the prevailing methods of producing meat into account and spews facts that show the flip side of the food industry.…

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Agriculture Satire

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal agriculture is ruining our planet. Scientists say that animal agriculture is responsible for more than 18 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions, which is more than the combined exhaust gases from all transportation in the world. Therefore, this means that riding your bike, walking or taking the bus will not help if you want to be kind to our earth. Although I do understand that some people might enjoy eating meat and that they might not feel complete without it the consequences of it has no mercy.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Satire

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Farming specifically for the production of meat and animal byproducts uses the most water and creates the most waste than any other major cause of climate change. According to Keegan Kuhn, “The meat and dairy industry uses approximately one third of the Earths fresh water and accounts for 55% of the United States water use.” (“Cowspiracy”). Animal agriculture is the unseen and unheard killer of our planet because in order to stop this atrocity one must make the lifestyle to go vegan and avoid animal products altogether. Eleanor Blau, of Auckland, New Zealand, did a comprehensive study off all vegan and vegetarian people in New Zealand and she discovered that many were vegan for the rights and treatment of animals and for its effects on our planet. According to Blau, “Some participants boycotted all products (including pet food, diapers, razors, batteries, shampoos etc.) manufactured by companies known to engage in animal testing and agriculture, even if the product itself was not directly related to animal use. Such participants preferred to support local animal-friendly businesses or companies that opposed animal testing.” (Balu…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major issues in animal agriculture is greenhouse gas emissions. Despite the fact that seventy percent of meat is made under the fair trade agreement(Grandin) animal agriculture brings about more greenhouse gases than transport. It also generates sixty five percent of human related nitrous oxide . Nitrous oxide has two hundred sixty five the global warming potential as co2(matthews).…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even though one of the main reasons for having pollution in our atmosphere is carbon dioxide emissions, studies have shown that there are many other culprits. One of these many culprits is the production of meats as well as maintaining the livestock itself. Scientists found out recently that “raising animals for food generates more greenhouse gases than all the cars and trucks in the world combined” (Top 10 Reasons Why It's Green to Go Veggie). Livestock also contributes to global climate change due to the fact that they cause the destruction of the land and the pollution of water…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the article was ending he began to try too hard to convince the reader and ended up losing the interest. He seemed to be blaming the entire world's problems on meat consumption. The problem is not eating the meat; it is how the meat is processed. Pace stated “Most of today's modernized farms have long, windowless sheds in which animals live like prisoners their entire lives” (Pace 355) He is saying that the way farms are being run now a days are destroying the environment and that is why eating meat is bad. Think back hundreds of years ago when the Native Americans used to roam North America. The animals were free, then hunted down and eaten. No one seemed to have a problem with animal consumption back then. The way to improve farms and the environment is not by not eating them, it is by changing they way they are processed. Even if most of the world decides to become a vegetarian the processing process will remain the same and the overpopulated animals will be killed the same, but this time it will go to waste because no one will eat it.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    vegetraianism

    • 529 Words
    • 2 Pages

    You may not believe that eating meat is damaging to the environment, but it’s been proven that it…

    • 529 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays