Preview

Lifeboat Ethics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
742 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lifeboat Ethics
Lifeboat Ethics Life is like a cruise ship… or at least until the engine blows up and your oasis of luxury sinks. Before you know it, you find yourself sitting in one of the few lifeboats, surrounded by hundreds of people who are now accurately portraying survival of the fittest. They are treading water and fearing sharks, all because there are not enough rafts. You are grateful to be in your lifeboat and eventually question if everyone on this earth has an equal right to an equal share in its resources (Hardin 1). Well, if you were not wondering about that, Garrett Hardin was. In his essay “Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor”, Hardin compares the condition of wealthy nations to that of a lifeboat. Hardin’s main idea is that wealthy nations should not offer any kind of assistance or support to people in poor countries because the outcome in doing so would be a catastrophe. Although Hardin’s ideas accurately state the problems of over-population and supporting the poor, he fails to defend his logic by not stating a satisfying compromise between the two extremes of giving all of our resources to the poor and not helping the poor at all. He uses a lifeboat example to show the segregation to show the segregation of the rich people in the boat and the poor people swimming in the surrounding water. Natural instinct is to take in as many poor people as possible even if the raft lacks space, but Hardin argues that the result would be a sinking raft and a disaster. There would be no positive result. If rich people pull poor people in the raft, the raft would then lose its “safety factor”. In the end, there would be no positive outcome in helping the swimmers and the result would be “complete justice, complete catastrophe” (Hardin 1). “In a crowded world of less than perfect human beings, mutual ruin is inevitable if there are no controls. This is the tragedy of the commons” (Hardin 3). The tragedy of the commons is a perfect


Citations: * Hardin, Garrett. “Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor.” September, 1974.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Hardin, Garrett. "Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor."Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor by Garrett Hardin - The Garrett Hardin Society - Articles.…

    • 2387 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MPS4 Fall 2014

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A. In the model of group selection presented in Module 9, who benefits from an altruist’s generosity?…

    • 513 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I was first introduced to Peter Singer’s idea of altruistic poverty at Governor’s School. It suggests that to achieve social and economic equality, individuals have to give away all they have until they reach the poverty line. While trying to wrap my mind around this questionable solution to such a complex issue, I realize that my previous way of thinking had been so egocentric. If I gave everything unnecessary for my survival what would my life look like? However, as this idea unveiled my own inadequacies as an altruistic individual, I began to wonder why capitalism does not encourage this altruism from all economic classes.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In college it is a common sight to see students crowding a room on the first day to try to get a spot in a class that is a requirement to graduate, but most of them already know they might not be able to get a spot in the class. This phenomenon is an example of the idea of “lifeboat” ethics. Garrett Hardin, the writer of Lifeboat Ethics, said in his writings “So we sit here, say fifty people in our life boat... let us assume that it has room for ten more… [we] see one hundred others swimming in the water outside, begging for admission in to our boat...” (Hardin 415). Hardin’s Lifeboat Ethics is about the concept that we’re on a boat and we’re trying to decide who will get on the lifeboat and survive. Though we are not in the open sea, our…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s essay, Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor, Hardin describes the wealthy population of the world as being in a single lifeboat that is almost filled until buckling while the poor population of the world treads water below. Hardin’s essay gets his readers to feel the natural instinct to survive. The lifeboat metaphor that Hardin uses relieves the wealthy population of their moral obligations to the less fortunate, but in addition, puts all of the blame and cause of the depletion of earth’s resources on the poor. As much as his argument may make sense, there are some flaws in his way of thinking. Alan Durning, who noticed that major flaws with Hardin’s essay, wrote on what he thought about the topic that Hardin has brought to his attention. In Durning’s essay, Asking How Much Is Enough, he argues that it is not overpopulation that is depleting the earth’s resources, but overconsumption of the resources by the wealthy population. The arguments in Durning’s essay makes the reader realize that the way Hardin uses the metaphorical lifeboat to persuade his readers into thinking the same thing as he does and shows that Hardin wrongly places the blame of all of earth’s financial stability problems on the poorer population.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The notion of the common good, as MacIntyre (1998) understands it, differs fundamentally from the notions in which the good of a community is logically constructed posterior to the goods of its members. To be more specific, MacIntyre (1998: 240) fiercely criticizes the concepts of the common good in which the good of the whole can "be arrived at by summing the goods of the parts" or by attaining public goods. Certainly, says MacIntyre (1998:239-240), it is a mistake to think that the practice of the common good "is no more than the summing of the goods pursued by individuals as members" of a particular community. Community, MacIntyre emphasizes, is not merely an instrument employed by individuals to attain their own goods. Otherwise, members'…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Swift implies that the poor can be considered useful, that they can work, and could help with conserving these resources. He points that it is the rich who should have partial blame for the lack of resources for the poor, due to their unnecessary spending or the way they “waste” or “manage money”. Hardin views this issue differently. He feels that the poor are unskilled, uneducated, and are a drain to the resources of the rich. Hardin feels as if the poor contribute nothing to the rich. He indicates that there is a better use for resources other than being used by the poor, and that the resources need to be controlled by those of richer countries. “To be generous with one’s own possessions is quite different from being generous with those of posterity.” (Hardin)…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and give his argument with regards to this problem. I will describe 3 counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he tackles, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counter-arguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal utility and also differentiate how it pertains to his argument. I will compare how the ideas of duty and charity alter in his suggested world. To conclude, I will provide my own reaction about this problem supporting singer’s argument. Should wealthier nations have a moral duty to relieve poorer nations if a disastrous event were to happen? I think that we all must contribute in times of need even if this means substantially modifying the way in which we live for the objective of assisting other people so long as it doesn't cause us to suffer.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Within his work, Peter Singer presents an argument that the people who live in affluent countries, the developed world, must drastically change their way of life and their conception of morality in order to help those in need. He begins by giving us an example of a case of famine, Bengal 1971, where people have been suffering and no one was doing anything to even try to alleviate the problem, this includes the government. I have summarized his arguments in the following ways: 1. Suffering caused by the lack of food, shelter, and medical care services is bad, and 2. If we can prevent something bad from happening, without sacrificing something…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    None of the precepts of justice aim at rewarding virtue. It is true that there is no legal obligation to save a drowning child; in a morally just society, each individual is most certainly entitled to his just deserts. Singer acknowledges that fundamental issue, “the whole way we look at moral issues – our moral conceptual scheme,” and believes it to be skewed, if not entirely wrong. Just as the individual in Singer’s drowning child analogy expects the deterioration of his personal clothing rather than a reward when he goes in the pond to save the child, so the affluent should expect a sacrifice on their part of entitlements instead of recompense when aiding the poor. In regards to claims regarding the impractical side of Singer’s argument, it should be noted that there is a world of difference between what society should appear to be and what society is at the moment. Singer’s perspective is clearly a normative proposal rather than descriptive, and while Singer does admit that it would be extremely difficult to alter an entire society’s moral code, “at the very least…one can make a start.” It is true that Singer’s argument is somewhat ambitious to apply to the present affluent society at the moment due to radical shifts in the status quo, but that is not a legitimate reason to dismiss what has…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Garrett Hardin’s essay “The Tragedy of the Commons” is a paper on the logical outcome of rational self interest. Rational self interest is what any person weighing their options would do to gain the most benefit. An example from the text is given about herdsmen. A herdsman would first increase his herd, disregarding the effect the increase number would have on the field the herd grazed on, to increase his profit. Hardin demonstrates that eventually, with every herdsmen acting in this way, the field that is grazed on…

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics” he explains that the world we live in is unequal and becoming increasingly poor. He tries to explain that if the poor isn’t controlled then the Earth will become overpopulated and unrestrained. I believe that Hardin’s writing of “Lifeboat Ethics” is effective and persuasive. His writing is persuasive because with every action to fix the poorness of our world he has a counter, Hardin uses numbers and percentages to show how the population increases of poor countries versus rich ones, and he also paints pictures in people’s heads very well.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Phi 208 week 2 assignment

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In reading the Peter Singer – “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” article I believe his argument is to help those in need. He has a lot of good points and I think he does a good job in arguing and defending from different perspectives. And in doing this makes it easier for the reader to see both sides. Singer’s argument to help others with food and shelter, as long as we are not sacrificing anything morally significant then it is in our power to help others in need. Singer also makes points on giving to charities and assuming others will give so I don’t need to give. Or giving in the aspect or thought that others will not give. He wants us all to give within our means and help others without doing damage to our own family or putting ourselves in a hardship.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Garrett Hardin first wrote “The Tragedy of the Commons”, and was published in his Journal in 1968, and it is one of the big issue World today face. He has mention tragedy of Common as exploitation of human on the environment without accounting externalities. He has given example on four herdsmen. It generally takes place from agriculture revolution and it proceeding even in post-industrial revolution whereby Hardin have concern on it. This means that common take more advantage from common resources over private. As four herdsmen who share one pastures land, this is not suitable in post-industrial revolution because he explain about the depleting human resources that time whereas it is more concern with pollution that human activities have…

    • 2778 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays