Preview

Law Brief

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2094 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law Brief
Legal Brief:

Doe v. Withers
Liability within the Educational System

EDED 6312
School Law
Dr. Jones
Dallas Baptist University
Spring 2012

Name of Case: Doe v. Withers
Civil Action Number: 92-C-92
Subject: Liability

The Facts: This civil court case takes place in a West Virginia school system located in Taylor County, when a general education high school history teacher failed to follow an IEP for Douglas Devart. During the case Devart and his parents Robert and Virginia ended up using aliases by the names of John Doe, Jane Doe and son D.D. Doe as a deterrent from the public so the family would not endure any additional embarrassment, slander, and/or liable regarding the son’s handicap. The defendants of this case were D.D.’s history teacher Michael Withers, Principal Greg Cartwright, Superintendent Wendell Teets and the Taylor County Board of Education. The following is a sequence of events that happened in chronological order that led up to the trial. Plaintiff D. D. was diagnosed as having a learning disability in the fourth grade while attending Anna Jarvis School in Taylor County. At that time he had been put on an Individual Educational Program (a.k.a. IEP) designed to accommodate his learning disability as required by Public Law 94-142 and implementing federal regulations, 34 C.F.R. 300.130 and implementing State Policy No. 2419, Section 1.3, 1.4 and 2.11, because of his learning disability D.D.’s educational program was adapted to provide oral testing by a learning disabilities teacher in a learning disabilities resource classroom. This accommodation was regularly provided at Anna Jarvis School and Grafton Middle School. When the Plaintiff, D. D., entered Grafton High School it was shown that he received low grades in most subjects during the first quarter of his freshman year concerned of their sons low performance D.D.’s parents scheduled meetings with all of his teachers to discuss their son’s IEP and to make sure his needs

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Case Brief

    • 7225 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Combined Source: Company Profiles and Directories;US Law Reviews and Journals, Combined;Federal & State Court Cases - After 1944, Combined;Newspaper Stories, Combined Papers…

    • 7225 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tyler Chase Harper, a high school sophomore, was sent to the principal’s office for violating the dress code. He was wearing a T-shirt which contained statements that disparaged the homosexual community. Chase filed suit in federal court claiming that the school violated his First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and religion, as well as rights protected by the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses under the federal Constitution and the California Civil Code.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Brief

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mr. Potbelly holds a garage sale at his home. Mr. Slim Jim stops by the sale and upon noticing a rare piece of art pottery offers a price of $100 for the art that is marked $250. Mr. Potbelly accepts Mr. Slim Jim’s offer. Mr. Potbelly informs Mr. Slim Jim he is selling his home because he is moving up north because he has lost his job. Mr. Slim Jim asks how much he is selling it for and Mr. Potbelly informs him he is thinking $75,000. Mr. Slim Jim offers him $70,000 cash for the property which Mr. Potbelly immediately accepts the offer. Mr. Slim Jim informs Mr. Potbelly that he will be back in one hour with a cashiers’ check made payable to Mr. Potbelly. Mr. Potbelly says “Great!” and that while Mr. Slim Jim is getting the money that he will find a box in his basement for the pottery.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS Rumarson Technologies, Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24,965 owed to it by Event Marketing, Inc. (EMI) when EMI's check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI's corporate account, and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower court agreed and ruled in favor of RTI holding the Helmers liable. The Helmers appealed. Also of note, is that check was dated 1998 although there is some non-material dispute as to whether it was August 14, 1998, or on or around July 13, 1998.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The allegations to be decided were whether the student’s misconduct violated the Bland ISD code of conduct, whether the ARD (Admissions, Review, and Dismissal) committee’s decision was involved when requiring the student to go to DAEP. The ARD process is a meeting between teachers, staff, and parents that help determine the IEP or Individualized Education Plan for the student. In the summary judgement is was determined that the IDEA does not dictate the code of conduct, that is regulated by individual school districts. The parents/guardians did not have enough proof that ARD, the IEP, or school district did not properly execute their policies regarding the code of conduct, and a further hearing was denied.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issues: In this scenario a student maintained residence in the town of Trenton, a community that does not have a high school. Students from this area are able to enrolled in Ellsworth or MDI high schools, however, due to behavioral issues the student was placed in a more restrictive environment in Bangor (Parent v. Trenton, 1999, p.2). During the spring of the 1998-1999 academic year the student returned home without “notifying the Trenton School Department of the student’s self initiated change in residency/educational placement” (Parent v. Trenton, 1999, p.2). The student was denied enrollment in both of the available high schools due to his/her intended date of enrollment, and failure to pass a background check (Parent v. Trenton, 1999, p.5). Interestingly, the issues addressed in this case do not consider the lawfulness of the schools’ denial for enrollment, but instead focused on Trenton School Department and if it sufficiently provided the student…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Is there error in the court denying a jury instructions on criminally negligent homicide, instead instructing on reckless manslaughter, which alleges the defendant had intent to kill, when there is enough evidence to support the theory the defendant’s conduct was unintentional.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law Quiz

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    | This quiz consist of 20 multiple choice questions. The first 10 questions cover the material in Chapter 14. The second 10 questions cover the material in Chapter 15. Be sure you are in the correct Chapter when you take the quiz.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Brief

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the evening of January 5, 1993, Tracie Reeves and Molly Coffman, both twelve years of age and students at West Carroll Middle School, spoke on the telephone and decided to kill their homeroom teacher, Janice Geiger. They agreed that Coffman would bring rat poison to school the following days so that it could be placed in Geiger 's drink. After that , they would steal Geiger 's car and drive to the Smoky Mountains. On the morning of January 6, Coffman placed a packet of rat poison in her purse and board the school bus. Coffman told another student, Christy Hernandez, of the plan and show her the poison. Hernandez went and informed her homeroom teacher, Sherry Cockrill. Cockrill then informed the school principal, Claudia Argo. When Geiger entered her classroom that morning, she observed Reeves and Coffman leaning over her deck; and when the girls noticed her, they giggled and ran back to their seats. Geiger saw a purse lying next to her coffee cup on the top of the desk. Shortly after Argo called Coffman to the principal 's office, rat poison was found in Coffman 's purse. Both Reeves and Coffman gave written statement to the Sheriff investigator concerning their plan to poison Geiger and steal her car.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case brief

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS: In August of 2003 Detective Shane Blankenship, a social worker, was assigned to investigate and interview Michael Shatzer about claims that Shatzer had sexually abused his three year old son. At the time of the investigation Shatzer was incarcerated at Maryland Correctional Institution-Hagerstown for an unrelated child-sexual abuse offense. Before asking Shatzer any questions, Detective Blankenship informed Shatzer of his rights, Shatzer then obtained a written waiver of those rights. Blankenship proceeded to end the interview, release Shatzer back into the general prison population, and end the investigation. After two years and six months, Dectective Hoover reopened the investigation, interviewed Shatzer's son who was now eight years old, who could now describe the incident in more detail. In March of 2006, Hoover went to Roxbury Correctional Institute to interview Shatzer about sexually abusing his son. After approximately 30 minutes of interviewing, Shatzer agreed to take a polygraph; in which he failed. At no point during this second interview did Shatzer request to speak to a lawyer or refuse to answer Hoover's questions without a lawyer present. After incriminating himself, Shatzer was charged with second-degree sexual offense, sexual child abuse, second-degree assault and contributing to conditions rending a child in need of assistance. In court, Shatzer moved to suppress his March 2006 statements in regards to Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981). The trail court denied his motion. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Maryland reversed the trail courts decision stating that release of Shatzer back into the general prison population did not constitute a break in custody.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In December 1973 the plaintiff, Robert Steinberg, applied for admission to the defendant, the Chicago Medical School, as a first-year student for the academic year 1974--75 and paid an application fee of $15. The Chicago Medical School is a private, not-for-profit educational institution, incorporated in the State of Illinois. His application for admission was rejected and Steinberg filed a class action against the school, claiming that it had failed to evaluate his application and those of other applicants according to the academic entrance criteria printed in the school 's bulletin. Specifically, his complaint alleged that the school 's decision to accept or reject a particular applicant for the first-year class was primarily based on such nonacademic considerations as the *806 prospective student 's familial relationship to members of the school 's faculty and to members of its board of trustees, and the ability of the applicant or his family to pledge or make payment of large sums of money to the school. The complaint further alleged that by using such unpublished criteria to evaluate applicants the school had breached the contract, which Steinberg contended was created when the school accepted his application fee.…

    • 3218 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    added a requirement that, when a parent files a due process hearing complaint, the district and parent must promptly participate in a resolution session, unless they agree in writing to waive the resolution session. The purpose of the resolution session is to provide a forum at which the parent explains the complaint and what s/he is seeking through the process so that the district has an…

    • 1851 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rafael made academic progress, however he had no contact with nondisabled students. The Oberti filed for a due process hearing under IDEA requesting Rafael be placed in a regular class in his neighborhood school. The Administrative Law Judge affirmed the school district’s decision to place Rafael in a segregated special education class as the least restrictive environment for Rafael and based on the disruptive behaviors Rafael was not ready for mainstreaming. The Obertis filed a civil action in the District Court. The district court ruled in favor of the Obertis, because the School District had violated IDEA by not establishing evidence that Rafael could not at the time be educated in a regular classroom with supplementary aids and services. The court also found the School District in violation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act because the District refused to include Rafael in a regular classroom therefore discriminating against Rafael. The court therefore ordered the School District to develop and inclusive plan for Rafael for the following school year consistent with the requirements of IDEA and Section 504 of the…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A child with disabilities is a major focus in today’s education. Achieving my Bachelors in Special Education, I need to be aware of the need to ensure appropriate education for all children with disabilities. “The education of children with disabilities is a top national priority. Our nation’s special education law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), sets high standards for their achievement and guides how special help and services are made available in schools to address their individual needs (National Dissemination)”. This is my biggest challenge. I feel with the right tools and help with administration; my job will guarantee a bright future for my students with disabilities. I came across a case, Irving Independent School District v. Amber Tatro. The findings of this case gave me some insight on the statues and limitations that I as an educator have to abide by. But it also gave me hope that we the educators have the right to make such access meaningful to handicapped children.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Applications for asylum may not be made against the wishes of a parent of a child that lacks the mental capacity to request asylum and a third party cannot speak on behalf of a minor because it is the right of a…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays