Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

King Lear, Shakespeare Tragedy

Powerful Essays
1993 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
King Lear, Shakespeare Tragedy
A true tragedy has a very serious tone by which many sorrowful events lead to some kind of death. In literature, tragedy can often seem very dry due to the reader most likely knowing the ending. But often, the author uses different content and styles of writing to further develop the story beyond what is actually being read. Some examples of these methods are the use parallel plots, themes, and imagery. A parallel plot can be used to help support the main plot of the story, and themes or imagery are often used to help the reader picture what a certain character might be experiencing. In William Shakespeare’s King Lear, the reader is better able to understand the content of the story through the author’s thorough use of imagery, themes, as well as its parallel plot. These techniques allow each individual reader to interpret the story in their own way. The use of a parallel plot allows the author to enhance the meaning or idea that is trying to be reached in the story. Sharing common themes between the two plots can aid in this idea. The plot with King Lear having the same themes as the plot with the Earl of Gloucester truly develops the story as a whole. Shakespeare probably realized having the two plots share themes would enforce the points he was trying to reach. An example of a common theme shared is the conflicting relationship between father and child. Lear starts the entire dilemma of hate and destruction by his desire for flattery. It can be assumed from the play 's title, Lear and his daughters are part of the main plot, whereas the plot of Gloucester and his sons is considered parallel. Gloucester 's plot acts as an echo since it repeats some of the events and thoughts which took place earlier, only it uses different characters and settings. Shakespeare probably planned this so he could introduce an idea then support it later through each plot point. Literary critic, Harold Bloom would agree, “The Gloucester subplot may be said to work deliberately against Lear’s Jobean sense of his own uniqueness as a sufferer;”(2). The use of Gloucester 's plot in the play gives the reader an opportunity to experience the problem and its answers not just once, but twice. The reader can catch up on any previously overlooked points even though different characters and situations are presented. From the beginning, Shakespeare allows the reader to explore an idea of King Lear without any prior background to his character. In the first scene when Lear has each daughter express their love, Goneril first introduces Lear 's state of symbolic blindness. “Sir, I love you more than word can wield the matter; dearer than eyesight, space and liberty...”(KL 1.1.57-64). At this point, the reader can see Goneril 's true personality, and King Lear 's lack of perception. It 's not until all three daughters ' speeches are given that the reader can truly understand to King Lear 's blindness. It is Goneril and Regan 's speeches that blind King Lear from understanding and accepting Cordelia 's true expression of love. “Noting will come of nothing. Speak again”(KL 1.1.92). It is King Lear 's distorted mindset that leaves him in the dark from what is the truth. Cordelia 's speech challenges King Lear 's intelligence and portrays him as being less powerful. It is after this initial blindness that drives King Lear to begin to make many mistakes. Literary critic G. Wilson Knight agrees, “Lear starts his own tragedy by a foolish misjudgment”(13). He not only loses his daughter, but he also loses his most loyal friend, Kent. “Come not between the Dragon and his wrath. I loved her most, and though to set my rest on her kind nursery. Hence and avoid my sight”(KL 1.1.124-126) This show that King Lear can admit to his own wish for peace and rest but, he cannot acknowledge the fact that both Cordelia and he are being stubborn to not allow love except on their own terms. It is strange how Shakespeare made the reader aware of Cordelia 's knowledge of King Lear 's blindness but she doesn’t make it known to him. It seems Cordelia does a poor job to sell the fact she truly loves her father. Even when Cordelia does speak again, she does not go any further than saying that it is her duty to love Lear. “You have begot me, bred me, loved me. I return those duties back as are right fit, obey you, love you, and most honor you”(KL 1.1.98-100). Though she tells that she only loves her father because she has to, it can be clearly read through that she is more true to him than her sisters. The theme of lack of sight is mimicked in the paralleling plot with the Earl of Gloucester. Gloucester like Lear is challenged by Edgar 's mistrust. “O villain, villain! His very opinion in the letter”(KL 1.2.80). In the blind panic of hurt and fear, Gloucester is easily persuaded and doubts his own son’s loyalty, even though he has no evidence. This shows the reader how much Gloucester relies on others to make up his mind for him. Gloucester like Lear is blinded by his son 's betrayal and is not able to see the truth until Regan and Cornwall physically blind him. The Earl of Gloucester and King Lear are both similar in weakness in that both can’t see past their own ill-sense of truth. Throughout King Lear is there is another dominant theme of deceit and betrayal. Since this is a tragedy, this theme is shown in the few lines. It seems as if Shakespeare often used these themes in his tragedies to set the mood. The reader is first introduced to this theme through Goneril and Regan and their hatred for their father. This becomes the center of the play and also leads to the madness that Lear suffers from. G. Wilson Knight states, “His purgatory is to be a purgatory of the mind, of madness”(13). Knight’s statement proves that Lear is ultimately in his own world of insanity. The first words that Goneril speaks are empty and are opposite of what she really feels. “…A love that makes breathe poor, and speech unable”(KL 1.1.62-3). The reason why there are no words to express her love for her father is that she has no love for him. The same goes for her sister, Regan, who is plotting against her father as well. She says that she feels the same way as her sister but tells that she loves Lear more than her sisters and that Goneril 's affection for her father, “…Only she comes too short”(KL 1.1.74). By saying this, Regan shows that her love is even less true than that of her sister’s. She goes even farther to say, “...that I profess myself an enemy to all other joys which the most precious square of sense possesses and find I am alone felicitate In your dear Highness’ love”(KL 1.1.74-9). This proves Regan to be even greedier than her sister and that her words are more false. In the parallel plot, another deceitful person is Edmund. In the beginning of Act 2 he draws his sword on Edgar and tells him to pretend like he is protecting himself because he hears Gloucester coming. Edmund states, “I hear my father coming. Pardon me: In cunning I must draw my sword upon you. Draw, seem to defend yourself; now quit you well. Yield! Come before my father! Light ho, here! Fly, brother. Torches, torches! -So, farewell”(KL 2.1.30-4). Edmund tells Gloucester that he was attacked by Edgar and that he even drew blood from Edmund. The motive behind this is greed and envy. Edmund has no love for hid father and is envious of the fact that he will not inherit any title from Gloucester. Edmund goes on to say, “With his prepared sword he charges home my unprovided body, latched mine arm; But when he saw my best alarumed spirits bold in the quarrel 's right, roused to th ' encounter, or whether gasted by the noise I made, Full suddenly he fled”(KL 2.1.54-9). He greedily deceives Gloucester and gets him to sympathize by incriminating Edgar. This shows how Edmund is just as evil as Goneril and Regan. Shakespeare seems as if he wanted to really illustrate the similarities between Edmund, Regan, and Goneril buy showing how they play the victim but are truly aren’t. Michael J. Warren describes, “As Edmund, dedication to an ideal…a dangerous self-righteousness that must exercise itself on others”(52). Warren tells of how Edmund’s self involved nature is dangerous to others, proving true with the gain of his fathers thrown. Throughout both plots of King Lear, the children’s’ plan to overthrow their father proves a motive greed, deceit, lack of feeling, and betrayal. The central theme throughout King Lear would probably be the suffering or some kind of unhappiness of the characters. Shakespeare always seems to have his characters suffer in some kind of unhappiness in all of his tragedies and that suffering leads to death. When King Lear is thrown out of his daughters ' homes and left with a fool, he realizes his mistake and suffers the banishment of his two eldest daughters. Lear also suffers from lack of rest when he is moving all over the place and the thing that breaks him is the death of his youngest daughter, Cordelia. Lear states, “And my poor fool is hanged: no, no, no life? Why should a dog, a horse, a rat, have life, and thou no breath at all? Thou 'lt come no more, never, never, never, never, never"(KL 5.3.306-10). The pain and suffering endured by Lear eventually tears down his strength and sanity. Lear is not as strong, arrogant, and prideful as he was in the beginning of the play instead he is weak, scared, and unhappy old man. Another feeling of unhappiness/suffering is when King Lear is shouting during the storm, “I tax not you, you elements, with unkindness. I never gave you kingdom, called you children, you owe me no subscription”(KL 3.2.16-8). He was suffering because he felt that he didn 't deserve what he had received from his two daughters. The fall of Lear is not just the suffering of one man but the suffering of everyone around him. Critics from Readings on the Tragedies of William Shakespeare tell, “Lear, however, has seen too much in life to remain in this world, and his death is as appropriate as it is inevitable”(196). Due to his fall as king, King Lear ultimately has no more reason to live anyhow because he has nothing to live for. In conclusion, King Lear accomplishes the task of being a tragedy because it is a clear series of events that lead to death. Shakespeare does a great job of emphasizing the need for a parallel plot to better grasp the many meanings of King Lear. Using the many themes and ideas to better enhance this story truly make this a great tragedy. By thoroughly illustrating these ideas, Shakespeare causes the reader to read more into what is behind the text to gain a better understanding of the play as a whole. Works Cited

Barnet, Sylvan, Morton Berman, and William Burto. “The Plot of Tragedy Best Suits King Lear.” Readings on the Tragedies of William Shakespeare. Ed. Clarice Swisher. San Diego: Greenhaven, 1996. 194-97.
Bloom, Harold. Introduction. William Shakespeare’s King Lear. Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea, 1987. 1-8
Knight, G. Wilson. “King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque.” William Shakespeare: The Tragedies. Modern Critical Views. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea, 1985. 11-26
Shakespeare, William. King Lear. Ed. Russell Fraser. New York: Signet, 1998
Warren, Michael J. “Quarto and Folio King Lear and the Interpretation of Edgar and Albany.” William Shakespeare’s King Lear. Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea, 1987. 45-56.

Cited: Barnet, Sylvan, Morton Berman, and William Burto. “The Plot of Tragedy Best Suits King Lear.” Readings on the Tragedies of William Shakespeare. Ed. Clarice Swisher. San Diego: Greenhaven, 1996. 194-97. Bloom, Harold. Introduction. William Shakespeare’s King Lear. Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea, 1987. 1-8 Knight, G. Wilson. “King Lear and the Comedy of the Grotesque.” William Shakespeare: The Tragedies. Modern Critical Views. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea, 1985. 11-26 Shakespeare, William. King Lear. Ed. Russell Fraser. New York: Signet, 1998 Warren, Michael J. “Quarto and Folio King Lear and the Interpretation of Edgar and Albany.” William Shakespeare’s King Lear. Modern Critical Interpretations. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea, 1987. 45-56.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. In this first scene of the play, how does Shakespeare establish the parallels between the stories of Lear and his daughters on the one hand and the story of Gloucester and his sons on the other hand?…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Brian Blessed production of King Lear most closely resembles a Christian tragedy approach to the text in that it shows suffering as meaningful and links it with redemption. This view of the play accepts the disproportion between fault and punishment and sees death as a release from the world’s cares.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many of the plays by William Shakespeare, the central character goes through internal and external changes that ultimately shake their foundations to the core. Numerous theories have been put forth to explain the sequence of tragedies Shakespeare wrote during this period by linking it to some experience of melancholy, anger, despair, and the antagonist 's ultimate fall from grace in their lust for power. But such theories overlook the fact that it is in this very same period and in the same tragic works that portray the heights to which human nature can rise and fall in its purest and noblest, if not happiest terms. Surely the creation of so much light alongside the darkness and the perfection of the artistic medium through which Shakespeare gives them expression argues against the idea that the greedy side of human nature is his chief concern. His efforts to portray human life in its rarest form and not only the dark depths, but also the treasure rooms of our being. He tries to pierce beneath the superficial motives and forces of surface behavior, social, and cultural expressions and to the deeper levels of individual character and human nature. Shakespeare then places these aspects of human existence in their true relation to the wider field of universal life. In relation to the tragic hero, there are many similarities between the tragic heroes in Macbeth and King Lear. However, the differences between the two outline the re-occurring themes in both plays. In Shakespeare 's plays the central characters ' own weaknesses and lust for power lead to corruption. The unchecked power in Shakespeare 's Macbeth and King Lear ultimately leads to corruption, tragedy, and the hero 's fall from grace.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lesson 6

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages

    a) The opening Act of King Lear evidently portrays Lear’s downward movement as it coincides with Aristotle’s structure of Greek tragedy. The play begins with Lear, a hero of noble birth and ruler of Britain, in an ordered society soon to be disrupted by a fatal flaw that is the result of his excessive pride. His journey from the ordered to the disordered world becomes apparent after he hands his land over to his two elder daughters and banishes his youngest daughter Cordelia from the kingdom. The initial situation began when Lear asks Cordelia, “What can you say to draw / A third more opulent than your sisters?” (I i 87-88), in which she answers “Nothing, my lord” (I i 89). This demonstrates Lear’s arrogance and triggers the rash decision he makes that would greatly impact the tragic events that follow. At the end of the scene, his two elder daughters immediately work to conspire against him so that he would be left with no power at all. Goneril says to Regan that they “must do something, and i’ th’ heat” (I ii 311). This foreshadows Lear’s impending downward movement and begins the reversal of his fortunes as things go from bad to worse. Lear’s recognition of the truth and the existence of his tragic circumstance becomes slightly clear to him when he wonders whether he has lost his mind and cries out “O let me not be mad, not mad, sweet heaven!” (I v 46). Act I leaves off at this stage where Lear is about to suffer tremendously before further stages of recognition, retribution, and restitution occur later in the play.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The infamous playwright, William Shakespeare’s, King Lear relays the story of a tragic hero and his family while paralleling it to the sub-plot within the tragedy. The story of these two reflecting groups of characters displays the obliteration of once potent characters’ power, and the inversion of social order. King Lear, the father of Goneril, Regan and Cordelia experiences a digressing journey comparable to that of Gloucester, the father of Edmund, his illegitimate son, and Edgar. Both Lear and Gloucester make a reprehensible decision in confiding in their children that they thought were the most honorable, but were faced with…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear's Dementia

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Shakespeare, William, and Russell A. Fraser. The Tragedy of King Lear. New York: New American Library, 1986. Print.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Bradley, A.C. Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan, 1905.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    William Shakespeare wrote one of his tragedies, ‘King Lear,’ a play which focuses on the…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Satisfying, hopeful, and redemptive: some critics would say that these adjectives belong nowhere near a description of King Lear. One critic, Thomas Roche, even states that the play’s ending is “as bleak and unrewarding as man can reach outside the gates of hell” (164). Certainly, Roche’s pessimistic interpretation has merit; after all, Lear has seen nearly everyone he once cared for die before dying himself. Although this aspect of the play is true, agreeing with this negative view requires a person to believe that Lear learns nothing and that he suffers and dies in vain. Indeed, this is exactly what Roche believes when he states that at the play’s end, “Lear still cannot tell good from evil . . . or true from false” (164). This nihilistic approach, however, not only disregards many of the play’s moments of philosophical insight, but it also completely misinterprets Shakespeare’s intent. That is not to say that Lear is without fault at the end of the play; as Shakespeare surely understood, Lear is still human, and as such, he is subject to human frailty. What is most important about Lear, however, is not that he dies a flawed man but that he dies an improved man. Therefore, although King Lear might first appear “bleak,” Shakespeare suggests that Lear’s life, and human life in general, is worth all of its misery because it is often through suffering that people gain knowledge about the true nature of their individual selves and about the nature of all humanity (Roche 164).…

    • 3447 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Shakespeare, William. "King Lear." The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 8th ed. Vol. 1.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare's Context

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    William Shakespeare is one of the most successful and well-known playwrights in the world. His plays even though from a way back in the past have still survived today and are still held in very high esteem. The context of William Shakespeare’s King Lear proposes many differences from our world today.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It first became clear that Shakespeare's King Lear and Laurence's Hagar Shipley were similar main characters when their personalities were developed with flaws. King Lear was immediately revealed as an imperfect character when he was shown in his somewhat conflicting roles as a father and a king. After resolving to divide his kingdom amongst his three daughters Lear develops a way to decide how his power and land will be divided. Looking to his three children Lear probes, "Tell me, my daughters/ (Since now we will divest us both of rule,/ Interest of territory, cares of state),/ Which of you shall we say doth love us most?/ That we our largest bounty may extend/ Where nature doth with merit challenge."(I.i.49-54) It is at this point in the play that King Lear…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Revenge Cycle

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Revenge has the definition of taking vengeance for injuries or wrongs; retaliation. In the Hamlet, the main theme is that when people follow plans of revenge, it leads to tragedy. Throughout the play, several different people want to take revenge on somebody. Hamlet is a main character who is being asked to take revenge on his uncle to fulfill his duty as a son. Hamlet by William Shakespeare is a revenge tragedy because Laertes and Fortinbras and Hamlet seek to avenge a family death, in most cases the death of their father and in all but one case leads to their own tragic death.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Shakespeare, William, Tucker Brooke, and William Lyon Phelps. _The Tragedy of King Lear_. New…

    • 865 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays