Preview

Karl Marx and Durkheim

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
940 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Karl Marx and Durkheim
The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were full of evolving social and economic ideas. These views of the social structure of urban society came about through the development of ideas taken from the past revolutions. As the Industrial Revolution progressed through out the world, so did the gap between the class structures. The development of a capitalist society was a very favorable goal for the upper class. By using advanced methods of production introduced by the Industrial Revolution, they were able to earn a substantial surplus by ruling the middle class. Thus, maintaining their present class of life, while the middle class was exploited and degraded. At this time in history, social theorists like Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx challenged the aspect of social structure in their works. Emile Durkheim is known as a functionalist states that everything serves a function in society and his main concern to discover what that function was. On the other hand Karl Marx, a conflict theorist, stresses that society is a complex system characterized by inequality and conflict that generate social change. Both Durkheim and Marx were concerned with the characteristics of groups and structures rather than with individuals.

Emile Durkheim and the sociology of religion The theory claims that the real object of religious worship is not God but society itself. In The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, Durkheim argued that religion provided a framework of thought which was able to hold together the ideas and values that are shared by society. Durkheim believed that religion was no more than a reflection of the human need to be part of a community. He suggested that all societies needed to reaffirm their collective unity at times,
He argued that traditional societies were 'mechanical ' and were held together by the fact that everyone was more or less the same, and hence had things in common. In traditional societies, argues Durkheim, the collective consciousness entirely

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    One of Durkheim’s major works was a Book called ‘The division of labor in society’. This is known as one of his most famous books, as it includes some key elements of his sociological thoughts. In this book, Durkheim wrote about the differences within traditional and modern societies. He describes traditional societies as having a low division of labor in society- resulting in mechanical solidarity. This is a term that Durkheim used to explain small compact and quite simple societies such as small rural villages, where there was a strong…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emile Durkheim studied a clan society called the Arunta, he explains that the collective worship of the sacred totem unified society. He explained that their totem is sacred, it inspired feelings of wonder and awe due to the fact it is different to every other normal, profane item. Durkheim believes that the key feature of religion was not merely a belief in gods or higher powers, but the difference between the sacred and mundane. Durkheim continues to say that whatever religion sees to be sacred, must be seen to represent society itself, therefore when one worships a sacred symbol, one is worshiping society itself. This shows that religion is a means of uniting all people and tribes, through a consensus.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Durkheim (french sociologist), the process of education was to be understood in terms of its contribution to the maintenance of the social order. He saw the major function as the transmission of society's norms and values. He was one of the major contributing sociologists putting forward new ideas and establishing many themes which continue to be immensely important in influencing modern sociology. Durkheim believes that social solidarity is vital - a unitation of individuals creating an all round feeling of commitment and a sense of belonging to society as a whole. He believes that in particular the teaching of history links the individual to their society and if this happens they will become more aware of the fact that they are involved in something larger than themselves and will therefore develop a sense of commitment to their social group. He sees the school as carrying out a function that the family or peer group are unable to provide, this involves interaction and cooperation with others in which Durkheim compares school as society in miniature - a model of the social…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Durkheim defines religion as “a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things”. He says all societies divide the world into the sacred and the profane. Sacred are things set apart and forbidden, inspiring feelings of awe, fear and wonder. Profane are ordinary things that have no significance. His view on sacred symbols represents society's collective consciousness which is the shared norms, values beliefs and knowledge that make social life possible; without such consciousness it would crumble. Participating in shared rituals binds individuals together reminding them that they are a part of a community. Religion defines values as sacred giving the people great power compared to non-believers. Through collective worship society understands the moral bonds that unite them. Durkheim argues that religion functions to reinforce the collective unity or social solidarity of a group. The individual sees religion performing a significant function allowing them to feel a part of society and strengthens us to face life's trials and motivates us to overcome obstacles that would otherwise overpower us. Durkheim used the religion of Aborigines to develop his argument. He calls their religion 'totemism', as each clan of aborigines had a sacred symbol called a totem which was a symbol of their gods and of their society which reinforces their sense of…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Durkheim believed that in modern societies there was agreement or consensus over society’s norms and values, which resulted in social order and stable societies. Durkheim believed this occurred because society’s institutions successfully implemented social control. For Durkheim social control is positive (unlike interactionist and Marxist views on social control) as it creates social cohesion. Durkheim believes social control is achieved by various agencies of social control socialising individuals into socially agreed norms and values (regulation) and by integrating individuals into social groups. For example, schools bond individuals together into school communities and classes. They instil core norms & values through citizenship programmes. Religion binds people together during times of happiness e.g. weddings and sadness e.g. funerals.…

    • 24690 Words
    • 99 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion, according to both Geertz and Durkheim, is an important entity within a group. Emile Durkheim argued that religion is a social phenomenon - or product – that is sacred in society and acts as a force outside of the individual imposing rules and social norms which the individual finds acceptable by introducing the ideal of a transcendent existence. Durkheim uses totemic beings to represent the manifestation of these sacred beings. For Durkheim, Gods are not the main focus and reason behind religion; he focuses on the fundamental distinction between the sacred and the profane. Geertz’s argument is that religion is a cultural system – that it attempts to make sense of the world through symbols and meanings of those symbols.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Religion is a cultural universal and plays an important role in human societies. Emile Durkheim was perhaps the first sociologist to recognize the importance of religion in human societies. (Schaefer, R. T., 2003). In his research, Durkheim viewed religion as a set of beliefs and practices specifically connected to religion as opposed to other institutions. Following his direction, contemporary sociologists study the norms and values of religion through their own religious beliefs and through the interpretation of the Bible by Christians and the Koran by Muslim groups. Despite the widely spread discussions of conflict between Christians and other religions, most…

    • 2156 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Religion then became their escape from daily life. Religion, just like other social institutions, is dependent on economics. Marx’s view fit best within the definition of religion. Durkheim view on religion best captures the social function of religion. Durkheim’s view involves looking at religion within the context of the entire society.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Durkheim believed that religion was society and it was "God." That is, Durkheim believed that religion affected the establishment of society to such a degree that the two were inseparable. Durkheim thought society originated with religion. He also believed that religion was healthy for the society and that it helped people to become part of the society.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emile Durkheim Religion

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When studying religion and social life, Emile Durkheim came to the conclusion that society came before religion; in order for there…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As previously mentioned, functionalists argue that social order and solidarity to run smoothly – Durkheim argued that there are four main ways in which religion maintains value consensus. One way is through the sacred and profane, he argued that sacred referred to things that are separate from society and create feelings of awe, wonder and fear whereas profane referred to things that were inferior with no real significance. Durkheim therefore argued that the only thing powerful enough to inspire people in the way religion does is society itself therefore meaning people are not worshipping their religion or god, but in fact society – this means that people unite under the same belief, spreading shared norms and values all over and therefore creating consensus within society.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emile Durkheim

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Emile Durkheim, the world 's first official Sociologist believes society is a complex structure in which each separate part is responsible for its own function for the benefit of the whole. This essay will explain how society can be both internal and external to human beings, also three characteristics of the social fact concept, and three of Durkheim 's sociologically significant concepts. According to Durkheim, society comes in two forms: internal and external. First, the internal society forms the 'collective moral conscious ' . In other words, it is the defining mechanism in shaping our beliefs and attitudes for survival in the world. If society does not conform to the internal society, then social isolation, ridicule, and other forms of punishment could occur. Examples of internal society are the Bible, education, and laws. Society uses these devices to attempt to keep social order and construct a socially acceptable individual. External to society is the actual pressures from the community to conform to the collective. For example, ways of thinking, acting and feeling are external to society. Social facts exist externally to us and compel people to behave in a unified way, with norms that are constructed by society. These facts are recognizable through power that the external persuasion has, which can be exercised over an individual. In his early works, Durkheim defined social facts, according to Coser in The Work, by their exteriority and constraint, focusing his primary concern on the operation of the law.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Durkheim is a functionalist who believed that religion acts as a conservative force on society, he believed that there were sacred things and these were symbolic. What these sacred items represented was a collective consciousness which is a basic set of shared beliefs, values and social norms. He believed that the collective consciousness keeps the group together which would mean that religion is a conservative force in society. If people did not share the same interests they would want change and would go through religion to change things. Durkheim believed in the division of labour, he said that as society became more complex the collective consciousness would become weaker because people from on group in society did not see themselves as the same as another group. This would cause a change in society because the groups are waning different things. Durkheim examined religion in small-scale, non-literate societies. In today's large scale, complex societies usually contain a variety of different religions. It is possible to see how his ideas do relate to modern society.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emile Durkheim explored the scientific realm of sociology and how it related to religion. He viewed the defining feature of religion as the concept of the sacred. This conclusion was gathered after he had engaged in fieldwork with the Australian aboriginal people as he contrasted their worship of totems with religion in the West. No matter the cause of religion, it stemmed from a social area. Religion stood on the base of society and when the religion went through a change, consequently so did that society.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Society is a system where branches are dependent on one another for stability, and some of these legs may include rituals, religion, economics, educational systems, and a family unity. Durkheim upheld the views that, “the currents of ideas and emotions that generated when people interact and that constrain individuals from the outside (Collins, 1994, p. 197).”…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays