Preview

Julius Caesar - Manipulation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1162 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar - Manipulation
A person of great power has a large amount of control and influence over the vast majority of the population that they lead. Often times, their leadership position was gained through manipulation of the people as they try to sell themselves to them. This manipulation also affects any competition for that leadership position because a common technique to sway someone’s opinion is to make the competition look bad which then makes the people look down on the competition, causing the opposing side’s chances of success to plummet. William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar demonstrates this as a tale of manipulation leads to the downfall of the weaker link. Cassius, Mark Antony and Julius Caesar have perfected the art of manipulation as they are able to manipulate their prey into getting what they desire. Manipulation, as well as its connections to violence and the common good, ends up leading to the downfall of Brutus. This reflects Shakespeare’s opinion that power and success is achieved through effective manipulation tactics, which Brutus did not have.

Brutus wanted to kill Caesar for the common good, but in the end it was Cassius’ manipulation that really caused Brutus to continue his plan of killing Caesar. Brutus wanted to kill Caesar because he felt that he would be a bad leader of Rome. Cassius, who remains by Brutus’ side for the majority of the play, sees that Brutus had potential to outdo Caesar considering he has seen and cared for Caesar at his weakest point. Cassius then manipulated Brutus by telling him, ”speaking of Brutus and groaning underneath this age’s yolk, have wished that noble Brutus had his eyes”. (Act I Scene II 66-68) This is Cassius basically telling Brutus that the people of Rome love him and wish that Brutus would open his eyes and see what good he could do. Cassius writes fake letters to Brutus from the “people of Rome” to try and convince him that the people love him. It also showed him that he would be a shoe-in for king if Caesar was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The art of manipulation and persuasion is truly effective when one is incompetent to the fact that they alone are not thinking for themselves. Since the beginning of time, humankind has wanted to have control. In some instances they will strive for power in ways that make them oblivious to right and wrong. Occasionally, they will go against what they are told to do and instead to what they want to do. In the play Julius Caesar the power of persuasion and manipulation of language is clear when two men, Brutus and Mark Antony, spiel to the people of their country, each attempting to gain the support of the populace over the death of Caesar. Even though Brutus establishes ethos throughout his speech, Mark Antony’s uses it to his advantage…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the book, "Julius Caesar" persuasion is used to gain allies and power In the story, two of Caesar's long time friends, Cassius and Brutus, turn against him. To gain strength Cassius and Brutus create a conspiracy about Caesar to influence others to remove him from power. Throughout the book, there are many examples of jealousy and allusion used by Cassius for his benefit and the death of Caesar.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soon after the last breaths of one of Rome’s most popular general, Julius Caesar, Antony and Brutus were speaking in front of the people of Rome. Both cunning leaders were nimble in the art of persuasion and manipulation. The beloved leaders used the Ethos, Pathos, and Logos methods of persuasion to sway the crowd to his respective view of the actions of the night and their former general Julius Caesar.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony proves himself to be the most effective manipulator. This feat was the product of many factors that Antony both took into account, and employed to a greater effect than his counterparts. Using the illustrative Rhetorical Triangle of Aristotle, Antony was able to convey the three main ingredients of good rhetoric to convince the Roman mob to turn upon the conspirators, mere moments after being told by Brutus that they had acted with “honor”. Using Logos, Antony’s logical argument that Caesar was not ambitious made the mob begin to doubt their current suppositions that Caesar deserved death for his ambition. With the emotive appeals of…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people of Rome did not all share the same viewpoint as Brutus. It is clear that Commoners such as the Carpenter and Cobbler support Caesar’s rule when they disagree with soldiers on the street. The soldiers dislike Caesar because he killed Pompey, while the common people support him. These Commoners did not want Caesar to be dethroned. In addition, Brutus had to work to persuade the people that he made the right decision in killing Caesar. He gave a speech at Caesar’s funeral attempting to explain that his motives were solely for Rome. The only way for him to make the Plebeians take his side was by convincing them that if they did not support him, they were not true Romans. If Brutus truly did what was right for Rome, he would not have to convince everyone that his intentions were pure because they would already understand. Further evidence of the people’s love of Caesar can be found when Mark Antony reads Caesar’s will at the funeral. Upon being part of the will, the Plebeians cry out, “Most noble Caesar! We’ll revenge his death” (3.2.257). They did not want their leader to die; they believed he had their best interests at heart. Though Caesar did not leave much for the common people, the fact that he included them in his will indicates that he always thought of his people. If the Plebeians loved Caesar and he constantly thought about the needs of his people, then why would Brutus kill him for being a bad…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare revolves around how power manifests in different characters. The most obvious being Caesar, whose power inevitably led to his downfall. Through his development of the characters Cassius, Brutus, Anthony, Shakespeare reveals that the nature of power compels people to act more toward their own gain.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus believes he must kill Caesar to avoid a one- man rule and for the good of the country. His tragic flaw allows him to be fooled into this by the other conspirators. Brutus believes his motives are honorable. If Caesar was really being killed for the good of Rome and not because the other conspirators were jealous of his power, Brutus motives would be…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, Brutus and Cassius both helped kill Caesar, but their motives for doing so were different. The motive that drove Brutus to killing Caesar was his love of Rome. Even though Brutus loved Caesar, he was convinced that Caesar would ruin Rome, which he loved even more than Caesar. This was proven when Brutus stated “Not that I loved Caesar less but that I loved Rome more."In comparison, The motivation…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manipulation, in essence, is a timeless recurring theme not only in literature, but in our everyday life. William Shakespeare’s drama, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, is saturated with rhetorical strategies. Brutus, Cassius, and Antony use their words throughout different parts of the play to sway other people’s opinions. Cassius’s persuasion is so powerful it leads to the death of Julius Caesar. Brutus is left with the repercussions of the assassination and has to speak to the Romans. Brutus and Antony go back-to-back speaking to the Romans using rhetorical strategies to explain their diverse views on the event. These three characters’ use of ethos, pathos, and logos was so compelling it persuaded the other people’s views, caused Caesar’s death,…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Killing Caesar was not a thoughtful decision, however it shows Brutus embodied the tragic flaw of pride. The flaw of pride originated when Brutus got too caught up in the conspiracy. When Cassius dropped off the letters forged by the Roman people to Brutus, the letters were planted to give pride and honor to Brutus. Cassius’s tactic flattered Brutus, as his pride was unstoppable. Brutus joined the conspiracy not because he “loved Caesar less, but loved Rome more” ( Shakespeare 151). He joins under the impression to prevent Caesar’s tyranny, to save the people Rome. Once allied into the conspiracy, his trust is gained towards the motive of the…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus’ goal was to be an honorable man for the good people of Rome, but the Roman people did not see him as honorable once he killed Caesar alongside the conspirators. Cassius had a big influence on Brutus’ death, in both good ways and bad ways. If Brutus had been able to trust the other conspirators his fate could have ended differently. The basis of his suicide was a major effect of his irrational choices. Brutus was impractical at times and honorable at others, but his decisions led to a tragic death for him. Brutus’ demise could have had a better outcome, but choosing to trust at the wrong times and not to trust at the right times didn’t work out favorably for him. Consequently, it was his own decisions and inability to judge and trust people that led to his…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cassius makes the assumption “Than must I think you would not have it so,”. Displaying Brutus’s uneasy feelings towards Caesar makes Brutus more aware of this idea and opens it up to discussion. By doing this Cassius can expand on the fearfulness of Caesar. To do this he claims, “I was born free as Caesar; so were you: We both have fed as well, and we can both Endure the winter’s cold as well as he,”. This statement of equality revealed that Caesar is an equal to them and he has no reason to be placed on a pedestal of honor. With this claim that Caesar is not worthy to be king, Cassius tells Brutus that they should be ashamed of what they have allowed to happen in Rome. He calls Brutus to bring Rome back to the way it should be. Since Brutus is seen as a man of honor, he feels compelled to carry on this and do something about Caesar. Using claims such as these that will provoke Brutus are important and give more reasoning for the killing of…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joseph Wong once said,” Influence is the compass. Persuasion is the map.” In Act III, Brutus and Antony both used the technique of persuasion to win over the favor of the people in Rome. At the beginning of the act, the people of Rome had high respect for Brutus, as well as Antony. By the end of the act, the audience’s views were sculpted by the speeches of the two men. Both men swayed the audience, but Antony seemed to have gained the approval of the public. Consequently, the conspirators were not favored by the people of Rome because of Antony’s speech.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus Tragic Hero

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus’ one quest is to save Rome from Caesar and his ambition. Brutus thinks Caesar is going to have too much power in Rome. Along with some of the other conspirators, he thinks Caesar will become a ruthless leader and end the republic of Rome. Right after he stabs Caesar, he is quick to address the rabblement on his actions. “People, and senators, be not affrighted, / Fly not, stand still: ambitions debt is paid” (III.i.90-91). Brutus tells the people not to worry and that he did them a favor by killing Caesar and his ambition. Brutus only wants the best for his friend Caesar. Brutus has no bad intentions when he stabs Caesar. Brutus thinks human nature will take over Caesar and corrupt his mind without him knowing. “But ‘tis a common proof / That lowliness is young ambition’s ladder, / Whereto the climber-upward turns his face; / But when he once attains the utmost round, / He then unto the ladder turns his back” (II.i.21-25). Brutus compares Caesar’s rise to power to climbing a ladder. Brutus thinks once Caesar reaches the top he will forget the lower rungs which brought him there.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Composition

    • 600 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In “Julius Caesar” Cassius is willing to do anything to make Brutus the ruler and convince Brutus to help him kill Caesar. For example, Cassius tells Brutus that people are talking about him and says “I have heard where many of the best respect in Rome, speaking Brutus”(I, II, 58-60). It shows that the people of Rome want Brutus to be the ruler of Rome. This shows that Cassius want Brutus to be…

    • 600 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays