Gender Discrimination in Police Force
BUSINESS SCHOOL
Assignment Cover Sheet
FAMILY NAME
(PRINT CLEARLY)
FIRST NAME YANG UNIT CODE HRMT5501
STUDENT ID. NUMBER 20812193 DUE DATE 1ST APRIL, 2013 NAME OF LECTURER JACQUIE HUTCHINSON WORD COUNT 1625
WANG UNIT NAME MANAGING WORKPLACE DIVERSITY LECTURE DAY & TIME (if applicable)
TITLE/TOPIC OF ASSIGNMENT
Gender Discrimination In Police Force Smarmy And Perfunctory Efforts
Academic misconduct as defined in the “Guidelines on Ethical Scholarship, Academic Literacy and Academic Misconduct” is any activity or practice engaged in by a student that breaches explicit guidelines relating to the production of work for assessment, in a manner that compromises or defeats the purpose of that assessment. Students must not engage in academic misconduct. Penalties for academic misconduct vary according to seriousness of the case, and may include the requirement to do further work or repeat work; deduction of marks; the award of zero marks for the assessment; failure of one or more units; suspension from a course of study; exclusion from the University; non-conferral of a degree, diploma or other award to which the student would otherwise have been entitled. For further information on the rules and procedures in respect of appropriate academic conduct you should visit: http://www.teachingandlearning.uwa.edu.au/tl4/for_uwa_staff/policies/student_related_policies/academic_conduct Plagiarism is one example of academic misconduct 1. Plagiarism is taking someone else’s thought, writing or invention and claiming it as your own. 2. All references to other work must be properly cited in the text eg. (Smith 1996) and the article must be fully described in a references section including author’s name, date, title, book/journal, volume/page numbers. The Faculty of Business has the following regulation on Plagiarism: “The Faculty will promote the highest levels of probity and honesty amongst students and will provide instruction on ethical conduct. By submitting
Assignment Cover Sheet
FAMILY NAME
(PRINT CLEARLY)
FIRST NAME YANG UNIT CODE HRMT5501
STUDENT ID. NUMBER 20812193 DUE DATE 1ST APRIL, 2013 NAME OF LECTURER JACQUIE HUTCHINSON WORD COUNT 1625
WANG UNIT NAME MANAGING WORKPLACE DIVERSITY LECTURE DAY & TIME (if applicable)
TITLE/TOPIC OF ASSIGNMENT
Gender Discrimination In Police Force Smarmy And Perfunctory Efforts
Academic misconduct as defined in the “Guidelines on Ethical Scholarship, Academic Literacy and Academic Misconduct” is any activity or practice engaged in by a student that breaches explicit guidelines relating to the production of work for assessment, in a manner that compromises or defeats the purpose of that assessment. Students must not engage in academic misconduct. Penalties for academic misconduct vary according to seriousness of the case, and may include the requirement to do further work or repeat work; deduction of marks; the award of zero marks for the assessment; failure of one or more units; suspension from a course of study; exclusion from the University; non-conferral of a degree, diploma or other award to which the student would otherwise have been entitled. For further information on the rules and procedures in respect of appropriate academic conduct you should visit: http://www.teachingandlearning.uwa.edu.au/tl4/for_uwa_staff/policies/student_related_policies/academic_conduct Plagiarism is one example of academic misconduct 1. Plagiarism is taking someone else’s thought, writing or invention and claiming it as your own. 2. All references to other work must be properly cited in the text eg. (Smith 1996) and the article must be fully described in a references section including author’s name, date, title, book/journal, volume/page numbers. The Faculty of Business has the following regulation on Plagiarism: “The Faculty will promote the highest levels of probity and honesty amongst students and will provide instruction on ethical conduct. By submitting
References: Balkin, J. (1988), “Why policemen don’t like policewomen”, Journal of Police Science and Administration, Vol. 16, pp. 29-38. Brown, J. and Sargent, S. (1995), “Policewomen and firearms in British police service”, Policing, Vol. 18, pp. 1-16. DeJong, C. (2004), “Gender differences in officer attitude and behavior: providing comfort and support”, Women and Criminal Justice, Vol. 15, pp. 1-32. Dick, P. and Jankowicz, D. (2001), “A social constructionist account of police culture and it influence on the representation and progression of female officers”, Policing, Vol. 24, pp. 181-99. Franklin, C. (2005), “Male peer support and the police culture: understanding the resistance and opposition of women in policing”, Women & Criminal Justice, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 1-25. Garcia, V. (2003), “Difference in the police department: women, policing and doing gender”, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 19, pp. 330-44. Herrington, P. (2002), “Advice to women beginning a career in policing”, Women & Criminal Justice, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 1-13. Hunt, J. (1990), “The logic underlying police sexism”, Women & Criminal Justice, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 3-30. National Center for Women and Policing (2001), Equality Denied: The Status of Women in Policing, NCWP, Los Angeles, CA. Paoline, E. III (2003), “Taking stock: toward a richer understanding of police culture”, Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 31, pp. 199-214. Waddington, P.A.J. (1999), “Police (canteen) subculture: an appreciation”, British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 39, pp. 287-309. Walker, S. (1984), “Broken windows and fractured history: the use and misuse of history in recent police patrol analysis”, Justice Quarterly, Vol. 1, pp. 75-90. Wilson, O.W. and McClaren, R.C. (1963), Police Administration, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. Wood, R.L., Davis, M. and Rouse, A. (2004), “Diving into quicksand: program implementation and police subcultures”, in Skogan, W. (Ed.), Community Policing: Can it Work?, Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA, pp. 136-62.