Preview

Foreign Judgement by Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi and Nidhi Vaidya

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3704 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Foreign Judgement by Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi and Nidhi Vaidya
Introduction
A foreign Court is defined as a court situate outside India and not established or continued by the authority of the Central Government. And a Foreign Judgment means a judgment of a foreign court. . In other words, a foreign judgment means adjudication by a foreign court upon a matter before it. Thus judgments delivered by courts in England, France, Germany, USA, etc. are foreign judgments.
Sections 13 and 14 enact a rule of res judicata in case of foreign judgments. These provisions embody the principle of private international law that a judgment delivered by a foreign court of competent jurisdiction can be enforced by an Indian court and will operate as res judicata between the parties thereto except in the cases mentioned in Section 13.
Nature And Scope Of Sec. 13, C.P.C.
A foreign judgment may operate as res judicata except in the six cases specified in the section 13 and subject to the other conditions mentioned in Sec. 11 of C.P.C. The rules laid down in this section are rules of substantive law and not merely of procedure. The fact that the foreign judgment may fail to show that every separate issue, such as, the status of the contracting parties, or the measure of damages, was separately framed and decided, is irrelevant unless it can be shown that failure brings the case within the purview of one of the exceptions to Section 13.
Object Of Section.13 And 14
The judgment of a foreign court is enforced on the principle that where a court of competent jurisdiction has adjudicated upon a claim, a legal obligation arises to satisfy that claim. The rules of private international law of each State must in the very nature of things differ, but by the comity of nations certain rules are recognized as common to civilized jurisdictions. Through part of the judicial system of each State these common rules have been adopted to adjudicate upon disputes involving a foreign element and to effectuate judgments of foreign courts in certain matters, or as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A court is required to use long-arm jurisdiction over persons and businesses in another State when a civil wrong is committed within a State; when there is a contract in the State or a contract affects the State and when a business is transacted that allegedly cause injury to another person. “long arm jurisdiction is a statutory grant of jurisdiction to local courts over foreign ("foreign" meaning out-of-state) defendants. A state's ability to confer jurisdiction is limited by the Constitution. This jurisdiction permits a court to hear a case against a defendant and enter a binding judgment against a defendant…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are certain laws which are applied by the judge regarding this case in order to take decision:The regulations…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are certain analyses that can be determined depending if a court has jurisdiction over a defendant. A person can be submitted to a particular jurisdiction if the person is a citizen or not and depending on whether he/she committed a criminal act in that jurisdiction or whether he/she was transacting any business in that…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The fact is that domestic law has nothing to do with international law and companies should be ready to face any issue that could appear. The second week material offered more information on how to handle international issues. The forum selection is the most important thing to do when trying to avoid future conflicts of law. Litigation and arbitration are the best options for organizations involved in international disputes. Legal advice or counseling is a useful resource that could help avoid confusions and setbacks in the future; it is always better to be…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict a term defined as a verdict given by the jury that does not reflect the facts given at the trial. The jury could have made a mistake by misunderstanding the directions from the court, or verdict contrary to law. These verdicts may be overturned by the judge resulting in an obvious verdict and making sure justice is served.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alien Tort Statute (ATS)

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Court has since stated that the ATS provides “a cause of action for [a] modest number of international law violations.” To discern if a modern offense also violates the law of nations, which is also known as customary international law, courts will examine whether the offense “rest[s] on a norm of international character accepted by the civilized world and defined with specificity comparable to the features of the 18th century paradigms.” Further, a customary norm should be “specific, universal, and…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the most essential inquiries of law is whether a particular court has authority to preside over a given case. The jurisdictional question may be broken down into three components: is jurisdiction over the person, is jurisdiction over the subject matter, and is jurisdiction to render the particular judgment sought. Then there is different courts that have jurisdiction depending on the case. State courts have general jurisdiction, meaning that they can hear any controversy except those prohibited by their specific state laws.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hilton Vs Guyot Summary

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The historical foundation of all foreign country judgments recognition law is United States Supreme Court’s Justice Gray’s decision in Hilton v. Guyot which involved an attempt to enforce a French judgment. Justice Gray held that no sovereign is bound to execute foreign judgments, but the general comity, utility, and convenience of nations “established a usage among most civilized states, by which the final judgments of foreign courts of competent jurisdiction are reciprocally carried into execution, under certain regulations and restrictions, which differ in different countries.” In that decision, Justice Gray also provided the foundation for all subsequent common law and statutory formulas for the recognition of foreign country judgments by explaining that comity requires that:…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    this essay I will attempt to examine and analyse the effectiveness of international courts and…

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When international commercial disputes must be settled under the laws of one of the countries concerned, jurisdiction is generally determined in one of three ways:…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Universal jurisdiction

    • 1960 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Jurisdiction is one the legal terms that must be used with extreme caution. Most generally jurisdiction is understood as the power of the State to regulate affairs pursuant to its laws.1 Controversial issues may arise when offence assumes international aspect which can cause conflict between jurisdictions of the countries. In each of the preceding bases of jurisdiction there must be a material link between the state asserting jurisdiction and the crime. That is what distinguishes the Universality Principle from the other bases; there need not be any specific link between the crime, its perpetrator or victims, and the state undertaking to exercise jurisdiction2. It might be said, that this principle developed in regard with State’s aim not only protect its own interests, but international community’s interests as whole, as international crimes may affect all the international legal order. More specifically, international crimes, such as crimes against peace, war crimes or crimes against humanity and transnational crimes – money laundering, terrorism, piracy, etc. are global and causes threat to international community as whole. However, universality principle has generated a great deal of controversy, in equal parts exegetical and political. 3 The aim of this essay is to identify and analyze some of the legal challenges of prosecuting international crimes under the basis of universal jurisdiction.…

    • 1960 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A few things that can happen when resolving legal disputes in international transactions is a choice of law and jurisdiction. Many countries…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is known for quite a long time that there are no international conventions regulating multimodal transport which has been widely used in practise with the globalization of national economies and development of commercial system. Since the Hague Rules, Hague-Visby Rules and the Hamburg Rules are unable to cope with multimodal carriage, unimodal conventions will apply to the specific stages of the whole carriage which includes at least two different ways of transportation across borders. Each leg of multimodal transport may attract a different liability regime, making the issue of liability quite difficult.1. It will be quite difficult to define the regulating conventions at the very beginning for each convention has succeed only in introducing another competing international code, with the consequence that the world is currently burdened with three international codes each of which has succeed in attracting different degrees of state support.2 Apart from that, the range between different stages is not clear enough, especially when the loss occurred between two different stages. For example, the loss happened at the port during the time that the goods were unloaded from trucks and then loaded to a vessel, but it was found impossible to localise the loss specifically. Besides, the Hague-Visby Rules and Hague Rules are considered not to be able sufficiently to deal with electronic trade and containerisation, and the limitations of liability are also to be pro-carrier, while the Hamburg Rules are lack of universal application.3 In short, the…

    • 5835 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Res judicata pro veritate accipitur" is the full maxim which has, over the years, shrunk to mere "res judicata". Section 11 contains the rule of conclusiveness of the judgment, which is based partly on the maxim of Roman Jurisprudence "interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium" (it concerns the State that there be an end to law suits) and partly on the maxim "Nemo debet bis vexari pro una at eadem causa" (no man should be vexed twice over for the same cause). The section does not affect the jurisdiction of the court but operates as a bar to the trial of the suit or issue, if the matter in the suit was directly and substantially in issue (and finally decided) in the previous suit between the same parties litigating under the same title in a court, competent to try the subsequent suit in which such issue has been raised. The principle of res judicata is based on the need to give finality and certainty to judicial decisions.…

    • 4619 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Res sub judice

    • 1977 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Explanation attached to the section mentions that the pendency of a suit in a foreign Court does not preclude the Courts in India from trying a suit founded on the same cause of action.…

    • 1977 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays