Preview

Epicurus Vs Plato

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1461 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Epicurus Vs Plato
The subject of death and dying is one that philosophers have talked and wrote about for many years. It's impossible for anyone to know what truly happens after death, and many people have different and unique opinions regarding what happens after death, whether it be more of a religious or scientific view. Death is an unknown and interesting topic, that's why all of these unique opinions make for a good debate. Plato, an ancient Greek philosopher who was a student of Socrates has many works and Western influence on death and dying. Western views on the soul living after death is developed from Plato's ancient beliefs. Plato philosophized that the human soul is immortal, and that we shouldn't fear death. Epicurus, another ancient Greek philosopher argued that death is the end of the body and soul, and therefore should not be feared. These two philosophers have contrasting views on what happens after death, but both have similar views on how death shouldn't be feared. I find both Plato's and Epicurus's each make an equally persuasive case. The Phaedo is a dialogue depicting the death of Socrates, who was imprisoned for corrupting the minds of …show more content…
He writes about Epicureanism, and helps to support Epicurus's claims about death and dying. Lucretius is also passionate about how people shouldn't fear death, and believes that fear of death is the greatest obstacle to piece of mind. “Therefore death to us is nothing, nor concerns us in the least, Since nature of mind is mortal evermore” (Folly the Fear of Death). Lucretius believes the mind to be greater than the soul, and death to end the mind and soul. One of Lucretius's arguments is that in order for something to harm you, then you must exist at the same time to be harmed, thus when you are dead there is nothing, therefore you can't be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Death is one of the most discussed topics that has always risen a lot of doubt and concerns . Many philosophers and writers, through the centuries, have tried to find a definition or a reason for this mysterious and inevitable event. Analyzing Plato’s Apology, he seemed to have a positive view about death. He claimed that death is a “state of nothingness and utter unconsciousness”; in fact, he compared death with the act of sleeping. But since death is more deep and irreversible, humans cannot be bothered by dreams or thought because they’re dead, whereas this could happen while they’re sleeping. So death is a state of relaxing for the soul and for this motivation he considered death as a conquer for human’s life. He also pointed out another…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thucydides vs Plato

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Compare and contrast Thucydides’ and Socrates’ analyses of the fate of Athenian democracy in war, of why the Athenians went to war, and of how and why they failed.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is an impulse to fear death which exists due to the incessant involvement of religious ideas of damnation throughout time. Per Lucretius, this fear of death is completely theoretical, and is overall completely invalid; he argues that there is nothing after death, therefore, people have no reason to fear it. It is important to note not how he counters religion, but how he bases it upon his own ideas of atomism. Lucretius argues that the whole of the human body, mind and physique, are created from specific kinds of atoms. A principle idea of atomism is that the atoms people are comprised of provide the basis for the human senses, such as taste, smell, touch, etc.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s Phaedo is a dialog between Phaedo, Cebes and Simmias where Socrates gives some arguments for the immortality of the soul. In this work, Phaedo tells us about Socrates’ final days, who has been convicted to death. Great philosopher does not have a fear of death because he believes that when a man dies, the soul still exists even if the body perishes.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epicurus adds that if death causes you no pain when you're dead, it’s foolish to allow the fear of it to cause you pain now. Of Lucretius life we know very little, but we do know that he was a poet; he lived during the first century BC, he was devoted to the teachings of Epicurus,and he apparently died before his magnum opus, De Rerum Natura, was completed. Lucretius transmitted Epicurean philosophy and presented a vase view that is astonishing to the modern world today. It may seem as if his “Nature” may seem as Seraphin4 it though it paints a picture of human beings as entirely material and transitory, configurations of atoms adrift in a vast material of atoms adrift in a vast material universe of atoms, with no possibility of surviving the annihilation of the body.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato Vs Aphrodite

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As I was reading through the chapters of my art book, there were two pieces of art that caught my eye: the statue of "Nefertiti" and the statue "Aphrodite of Melos." After researching both artworks, I realized that these statues…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus Vs Socrates

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thrasymachus argues for the view that justice is the advantage of the powerful – that it is “simply the interest of the stronger” (Plato’s The Republic, translated by Richard W. Sterling and William C. Scott, page 35). Laws, he says, are specifically “designed to serve the interests of the ruling class” (36). Of course, the ruling class is the strongest class, so it follows that the laws serve the advantage of the strong. The citizens under the ruling class serve “interests [of their strong unjust ruler] and his happiness at the expense of their own” (41). Thrasymachus concludes that “the dynamics of justice, then, consistently operate to advantage the ruler but never the subjects” (41).…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thrasymachus Vs Plato

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What does it mean to be moral? This is the question that Plato has tried to answer in the passages from his famous work the Republic. He has attempted to explain how humans can define and live morally, a task that is truly complicated and uncertain. It is important to identify morality because it plays a crucial role in formulating ethical theories. As Socrates states, "we are discussing no small matter, but how we ought to live."…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Life and Death Overtakes

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Death is a dreaded word. It is a word that many people would not want to talk about. Death is considered a morbid word and many would not find this as an engaging topic. According to Patricelli (2007), “[d]eath remains a great mystery, one of the central issues with which religion and philosophy and science have wrestled since the beginning of human history. Even though dying is a natural part of existence, American culture is unique in the extent to which death is viewed as a taboo topic. Rather than having open discussions, we tend to view death as a feared enemy that can and should be defeated by modern medicine and machines”. There are also people that have negative connotations about death, rendering life even meaningless because of it. Death appears to render life meaningless for many people because they feel that there is no point in developing character or increasing knowledge if our progress is ultimately going to be thwarted by death (Augustine, 2000). But the author contends that there is a point in developing character and increasing knowledge before death overtakes us: to provide peace of mind and intellectual satisfaction to our lives and to the lives of those we care about for their own sake because pursuing these goals enriches our lives. From the fact that death is inevitable it does not follow that nothing we do matters now. On the contrary, our lives matter a great deal to us. If they did not, we would not find the idea of our own death so distressing--it wouldn't matter that our lives will come to an end. The fact that we're all eventually going to die has no relevance to whether our activities are worthwhile in the here and now: For an ill patient in a hospital a doctor's efforts to alleviate pain certainly does matter despite the fact that 'in the end' both the doctor and the patient will be dead (Augustine).…

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death In Culture

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Death is a necessity to culture and society therefore it is irrational to fear the unenviable and the necessary. Death whether physical or non-physical will always cause change. The change that is caused by death does not always have to be direct but can manifest itself as an indirect change. Throughout time societies have risen and fallen, times changes, nothing is ever going to stay the same. Death is a factor that will impact everyone who is alive as they will meet death. As society’s change and cultures evolve so do the people; to keep change occurring death must ensue for creation to occur. Society’s and cultures depend on death. Death is the drive of progression which drives society’s and cultures to get farther from the unetible death.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although some people choose not to discuss it, death is one of the biggest mysteries in the world. Since no one can be sure what happens after death, many theories have been presented throughout the years about this phenomenon. Today and throughout all of history, there have been many different groups that have had their own ideas about death. Specifically, in the late 1500s to the early 1800s, the Puritans, Revolutionaries, and Romantics each had their own different and unique views of death that impacted their literature and ways of life.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Approximately fifty years before Christ, Roman poet and philosopher, Lucretius began to state his beliefs to the world. We now know that Lucretius had many beliefs regarding death and the human spirit and how they were related. In his writing, “On The Nature of Things”, Lucretius states that the human spirit or mind is mortal. By saying that the human mind is mortal, Lucretius is saying that the human mind is subject to death, the same way that the human body is. The human spirit is a mental part of humanity, and includes things such as fear, intellect, and personality. Lucretius argues that death means nothing to us. People must actually live through death for it to have been remembered as painful, which as most people can quickly figure out,…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Vs Plato

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Republic, Plato uses his writing to express different opinions, through the conversations of Socrates and other characters. Towards the beginning of Republic, Socrates says that people believe others don’t “feel” old if they are rich and wealthy and not because they have a disposition to happiness. Socrates is pointing out that people value wealth and believe that being rich is the key to a happy life rather than having the disposition to look at life with happiness always.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facing Mortality

    • 2565 Words
    • 11 Pages

    First I am going to give a little bit of overview about how people other than myself feel about death and what they think death really is. “The word death comes from Old English deað, which in turn comes from Proto-Germanic *dauþaz (reconstructed by etymological analysis). This comes from the Proto-Indo-European stem *dheu- meaning the 'Process, act, condition of dying'.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death) There are also said to be many different processes that actually consider someone dead. Physiological death is seen as a process not just an event. In this process there is a dividing line between life and death that depends on factors beyond the presence or absence of vital signs. Clinical death is not necessary or sufficient for a determination of legal death. Someone that has a working heart and lungs determined to be brain dead can be pronounced legally dead without clinical death occurring. The medical definition of death becomes more problematic, paradoxically, as scientific knowledge and medicine advance. There are also different signs of death or strong indications that a person is no longer alive such as cessation of breathing, cardiac arrest, pallor mortis, livor mortis, algor mortis, rigor mortis, and decomposition. Cardiac arrest is having no pulse, pallor mortis is paleness which happens in the 15-120 minutes after death, livor mortis is a settling of the blood in the lower portion of the body, algor mortis is the reduction in body…

    • 2565 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death is nothing

    • 3373 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Epicurus as an empiricist, he made use of his senses to form judgements about the world around him. "Get used to believing that death is nothing to us. For all good and bad consists in sense experience, and death is the privation of sense experience.” Epicurus contends that the nature of death is that of annihilation. The living cannot experience annihilation, since experiencing annihilation is death. Death is not harmful for the living. An experience can not be bad for a person if they don't exist. A person who experiences frequent pain from a permanent injury, will not feel pain or any discomfort. The dead do not exist. Consequently, death is not harmful for living people nor the the dead.…

    • 3373 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays