Preview

Effects Of Imperialism In Africa

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1301 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Effects Of Imperialism In Africa
As the 20th century approached, more and more countries wanted more and more power. At the end of the 19th century, the Belgian King Leopold sent emissaries to the African Congo to establish trade. This single act caused France, Belgium, Great Britain, Germany, Spain, Italy and Portugal to go over to Africa and do the same. However, the European countries did not just establish trade, they invaded the African territory and took control over it. This became known as the Imperialist Scramble for Africa.1 By the 20th century, Great Britain dominated from Egypt to South Africa, Nigeria, and the Gold Coast; France occupied a vast expanse of west Africa; Germany controlled modern-day Namibia and Tazania; The Portuguese had full control over Mozambique …show more content…
In some parts, such as Ethiopia and Egypt, Christianity had already been introduced, but for the rest of Africa, Christianity wasn’t introduced until the modern era. Not all missionaries supported the colonialism that was happening, but the missionaries that did, believed that the control the Europeans would have would provide a better environment for the missionaries in Africa. The missionaries that d In the earlier days of colonialism, the Europeans allowed the establishment of private companies to administer in Africa.4 The companies were usually formed by business men who were just interested in exploiting the natural resources of the territories that they were allowed to run business on. The companies were allowed to set up their own labor recruitment and their own systems of taxation. Some European powers provided charters for these companies and did because the company took full responsibility for the expenses and because of this the European countries had the political benefit without the expense. For example, The British East Africa Company colonized Kenya on behalf of Britain and made treaties that …show more content…
The borders that have been established even today, were drawn out by European nations. Most of the time, the people that drew these borders paid no attention to the different ethnicities or the different political groups that were already established in Africa at the time. Sometimes, people who had never been united before were stuck under the same government. Other times, they just divided the existing government systems at the time of the conquest. The European nations ever took in consideration the different groups of people they were smashing together under one government. Africa was a divided country before the colonization started, and would still be divided even though the different groups were stuck together. They didn’t always speak the same languages, they had different religious beliefs and they had different political

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The nations attending the Berlin Conference divided Africa for reasons of their own, not taking into account the concerns of the native Africans. Africa was split into about 50 different geographical regions. By this time, the tribes of Africa had already established their own borders. Imposing new boundaries on over one thousand different cultures was bound to cause major problems. The new countries formed lacked harmony because the boundaries divided tribes that got along and…

    • 893 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1880’s the New Imperialism era began, which was when the nations of Europe began an expansion into Africa. The New Imperialism era occurred because of breakthroughs in technology and because of the search for profits that encouraged the Europeans to conquer lands outside of their European borders. Three main European colonial powers during the fight for Africa were Belgium, Great Britain, and France. All three wanted to gain access to Africa’s resources as well as their trading systems. The policies of these three European colonial powers were driving forces of the outreach into Africa between 1871 and 1914 due to their own desire to expand their boundaries for economic, political, and social reasons by using direct force. Economically, colonial powers were causing issues as well as health problems for the natives due to famine and ill treatment. Politically, this was causing rebellious out breaks as well as devastating wars and the population decreased due to conditions or expectations of the people. This caused laws to be passed to help set up the standards for establishing a colony. Socially, many were taking advantage of the natives and forcing harsh labor and burdens upon them and policies regarding the establishing colonies in Africa were questioned.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The British colonized Africa from Egypt in the north to South Africa. Extension of a nation’s power through conquering overseas territory, know as imperialism had several motivations. Nationalism urged the nations of Europe to conquer land overseas. Having colonies was seen as a matter on national prestige, it was a symbol of the nation’s greatness. Lands in Africa, rich in raw materials and markets, were seen as economic opportunities for the European nations. Along with the rest of Europe Britain participated in the Scramble for Africa.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Africa Imperialism DBQ

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Between 1880 and 1914, Africa was a great place to acquire colonies if necessary. Almost everyone in Europe was very supportive of this movement. Prince Leopold of Belgium was for this movement because he said that colonies are very useful in that they help the mother country gain wealth, natural resources, and power. (Doc. 1) He also believes that it is a great way to prove to everyone that Belgians are imperial people capable of dominating and enlightening others. Since Prince Leopold was heir to the Belgium throne, he wanted to make sure that his country had the most money and power it could get. Another European who loved the acquisition of African Colonies was Joseph Chamberlain. (Doc. 4) He believed that without the use of colonies, a country couldn’t survive. He believes that the mother country is highly dependent on its colonies raw materials and natural resources and without them half the population would starve. Another proponent to the acquisition of Africa was George Washington Williams of Belgium. (Doc. 6) He believes that not only is it good that they are acquiring land and wealth, but it is very easy to do so.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between the period from 1880 to 1914, European powers went after overseas empires in Africa. The governments and political leaders of the European powers believed that this colonization of the African empires was necessary to maintain their global influence. A second group of people supposed that African colonization was the result of the greedy Capitalists who \only cared for new resources and markets. The third group of people claimed it to be their job to enlighten and educate the uncivilized people of Africa. Although the political leaders of European powers encouraged colonization of African empires to advance their nation’s global influence, others argued that it was only for the profiteering of the Capitalists who sought new resources and markets from Africa and those who benefited from colonization argued that these actions were necessary in order to civilize the African people.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Africa was imperialized in 1884 at the conference of Berlin. By 1914, Europeans had taken most of Africa. Countries in Africa before imperialism where socially strong because they had a lot of different tribes, cultures and languages. However different ethnic groups were often in conflict. Economically they had complex trade. European countries imperialized Africa because they wanted to spread Christianity and abolish slavery. They also wanted their natural resources. They took advantage of Africa’s conflicts and took over with the cooperation of local leaders and their advanced weapons. The effects of European imperialism were socially negative because the British tried to enforce their beliefs and way of living on Africans by changing their…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    European imperialism has shaped the world over and over many times, acquiring many colonies throughout the globe. The colonization of Africa was no different for the Europeans. The need for raw materials motivated Europeans to acquire new lands in order to provide resources for their industrialized economies. The strong sense of a burden to civilize and enlighten others became the perspective for the approach of colonization.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between the late 17th century and early 18th century, almost all of Africa was under European rule. This was in great contrast to 1880, when close to none of Africa was under direct rule of the continents. This stark change in power was due to the interest in raw materials, new trade opportunities, political gain over other countries, and Europeans feeling the need to spread Christianity, democracy, and capitalism. (Spielvogel and McTighe 230-233). Although European imperialism helped to "civilize" the people of Africa and develop the continent, this justification is far outweighed by the facts that Africans were treated with immense oppression and a disregard for their culture. After imperialism, African nations were better able to prosper…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among those who supported conquering parts of Africa in the name of power was Prince Leopold of Belgium, who decided that attempting to take control of other European nations was futile but Africa held the possibility for more trade and more power. He reinforced his argument for imperialism by explaining how technology had advanced to the point that distance meant nothing in the face of collecting power. He expressed these ideas in a conversation, therefore one might be…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a whole, Africa was ruined by the Europeans’ greed during the early 1900’s. The European countries were very strong nationalists and they came together and decided to show their superiority by imperializing other continents and countries rather than fight with each other. They chose Africa as the best place to imperialize because of its natural resources and availability. This is what introduced the Berlin Conference. At this meeting, representatives from Great Britain, France, and other strong European players divided up Africa. There was a total disregard of the native people and each country just took what they wanted. The Africans had to work long days with little pay. European imperialism caused the African natives to fall into poverty and the working conditions were horrible. To cover this up, the Europeans educated the people and introduced them to industrial things and instruments. The European imperialism devastated the African people along with their land and tried unsuccessfully to justify it using education and industrialization.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Europe started to move closer inland of Africa, they started by making deals with the chiefs of native tribes. This started mostly with a journalists named H. M. Stanley. He explored Africa and made unfair treaties with leaders. He did this with support of the Belgian kind, King Leopold II. These treaties would often be something similar to, in exchange for a few yards of cloths and some trinkets, Belgium will be able to put their flag on the chiefs land and use the land as well as the people on it.5 Before Europe had come in and started to take over the land, the natives had known what resources they had and were very skilled in using them, and they lived largely off of trade with other regions and tribal communities. The had a livable system that was serving the community well. When Europeans took over, they saw many of the resources that were in Africa, such as diamonds and iron6 and knew the value of them on a bigger market and told the natives that there is much more worth in this land then they are getting out of it. The chiefs then let the Europeans trade the resources on a worldly scale, which, while it did give Africa a bigger, and more worldly economy, it quickly turned into a bourgeoisie/proletarian society with the African on…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All Civilizations strive to expand and conquer in hope to achieve power and security. After the Industrial Revolution the thirst for Africa’s resources and land was seen in all of Europe. In the 19th century, European countries all scrambled for authority and control, following the British Empire’s success and wealth. The reasons for this sudden hunger to imperialize africa was due to social darwinism, nationalism, and the vast raw materials africa had to offer. This raid of european people had great to effect to the african people.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    GKE1 task 3

    • 808 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The rise of new imperialism of the 19th and early 20th century involved Europe going into Africa. The causes of imperialism in Africa were partly due to the decolonization in America. The European powers were out political and economic gain by the United States gaining their independence. In 1876 European powers especially King Leopold II of Belgium, agreed in the Berlin Conference to split up the land in Africa, no longer invading to colonize but to gain political, military and economic power. The methods to imperialism of the African land were done differently, by each European power. The British who imperialized the cape of Africa used laws and indirect methods to gain power, however King Leopold II used extreme force to gain control of the Congo. The Congo was then ruled with strict political control and military force.…

    • 808 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The land in West Africa was mostly handled by the British and they used and indirect form of rule. Within the indirect rule, local customs were left alone, no slavery and there was a chain of command with central administrators who were appointed by the British. This type of system was one where the European explores were working with the locals to create a form of government but it was not as strong as it said it was because the appointed British leaders were making all the decisions and the local authority was just enforcing it. In East Africa, the local government was encouraging the white settlers to move to this area for farmland for economic development. Problems started to arise such as reserved farmland for the new settlers and the decision came that the African people and the European people would have separate government for each of the populations. (pg. 560-561 The Essential World History) In South Africa, things were more complicated. War broke out in 1899 between the Boers and British and by 1910, the British created the Union of South Africa, where a representative government was installed allowing the people to vote for who should be in office. This new government was only for the European people and the locals still were under the rule of the crown. (pg. 561The Essential World…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before colonization, African countries consisted of several small tribes, with different customs and languages. It is estimated that during pre-colonial ages, Africa was composed of 10,000 different polities and that after European intervention; these polities were combined into 40 colonies (Meredith, 2006). Some historians have concluded that European colonization has helped these dispersed African tribes unify. As colonies, these nations were obliged to the laws commanded by the mother country, which demanded products. In order to supply the mother country with goods, African citizens were forced to move into cities and work. Once the colonies became independent, the process of urbanization had already occurred. Those who are pro-colonization believe that the urbanization caused by colonialism led to a development of local industry. What defenders of colonialism do not…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays