I proceeded to analyze the sample writing, “prompt” activity 5.2, further exposing my ability to recognize grammar errors and corrective actions. A previously assigned reading mentioned native speaker know what sound correct automatically. Therefore, after silently reading through the 5.2 activity, reading it out loud allowed me to hear more inaccuracies. The quandary I am challenged with is what and how much to correct or ignore taking into consideration the following factors. First, will the corrections still preserve the voice of the original writer? Next, what effects will “marking” all needed corrections have on the learner’s motivation? Lastly, do the mistakes interfere with the intended audiences’ comprehension (Vann, Meyer, & Lorenza, 1984)? For me, the correct conclusion is, it depends on the context of the writing, the level and goals of the learner, and the intended audience of the text being written to determine the accuracy required and extent of the corrective
I proceeded to analyze the sample writing, “prompt” activity 5.2, further exposing my ability to recognize grammar errors and corrective actions. A previously assigned reading mentioned native speaker know what sound correct automatically. Therefore, after silently reading through the 5.2 activity, reading it out loud allowed me to hear more inaccuracies. The quandary I am challenged with is what and how much to correct or ignore taking into consideration the following factors. First, will the corrections still preserve the voice of the original writer? Next, what effects will “marking” all needed corrections have on the learner’s motivation? Lastly, do the mistakes interfere with the intended audiences’ comprehension (Vann, Meyer, & Lorenza, 1984)? For me, the correct conclusion is, it depends on the context of the writing, the level and goals of the learner, and the intended audience of the text being written to determine the accuracy required and extent of the corrective