Preview

Debate: Should Iran Have Nuclear Weapons

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1308 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Debate: Should Iran Have Nuclear Weapons
Eliminating Iran’s Nuclear Power

It’s quite astonishing how the United States conducts itself throughout the world. Consistently through history, the United States has made a point to go in and fight wars not usually so well received by the rest of the world. On November 1, 1955 the United States invaded Vietnam in order to impose their democratic beliefs during the Cold War; a time of the communist scare. More recently, in March of 2003, the USA declared war on Iraq because of the “belief” that there were weapons of mass destruction (WMD), though there was little evidence of this. So now, as the evidence mounts that Iran is awfully close to obtaining these same weapons, why has the US government not been able to eliminate Iran’s program. The United States not only should impose sanctions on Iran, but should create a dialogue with the rest of the world in pursuit of a complete disband of Iran’s nuclear power program. In order to understand the current situation, one has to first understand why a nuclear weapon in the hands of the Iranian government is so dangerous. In 2006, Ali Khamenei (Iran’s supreme leader), sent military support to Lebanon to fight the Israeli government, the USA’s closest and most trusted ally. This war was caused by the militant Hezbollah group firing rockets at the Israeli border towns as a diversion for an anti-tank missile attack on two armored Israeli Humvees patrolling the border fence. It should also be noted the the United States and many other nations have declared Hezbollah a terrorist organization. According, to a case study done by “The Christian Science Monitor,” Iran has been the world’s leading exporter of terrorism for the past 20+ years[1]. Although this is a already a fairly daunting fact, it’s even more frightening to realize that it is unlikely these ways will change in the future. While all this is true, there is a counter argument which is compelling. The truth is, the United States nor Israel has any right to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The U.S. and Iranian conflict started more than 60 years ago. It started when the U.S. and British intelligence agencies killed the Prime Minister of Iran. The U.S. then sought them for help almost 30 years later, by selling them weapons, but Iran had a plan of their own, America did not receive their help. In 2002, Bush declared Iran as an “axis of evil,” this angered Iran. That same year, it was revealed that Iran is developing nuclear facilities. During a phone call between the Presidents of the U.S. and Iran, the men expressed their desire to end the long running dispute between the two nations. They are still discussing ways on which to finish it.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For 60 years and counting, the United States and Iran have had a very turbulent relationship. From a coup d'état performed by the United States and Britain to an Iranian Revolution, this is a seesaw of tensions by frenemies America and Iran. Since the 1950s, both nations have had tricky issues revolving around Operation Ajax and the U.S Embassy Hostage Crisis.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran, as it stated and signed in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty, that it would not proliferate while having the right to peacefully use nuclear technology i.e. using nuclear power to generate heat and electricity. Along with signing this treaty Iran along with other signatories received some privileges from the NTP leaders done by providing alternative means of protecting members’ security – namely, enhanced access to conventional arms. However, the issue arose that Iran had secretly, over the past many years; Evidence uncovered by the International Atomic Energy Agency over the past 9 years demonstrates that Iran’s leaders covertly resumed their quest for sensitive nuclear technology during the decade long Iran-Iraq war. This quest continued even after that war, while the Iranians insist that their strife to have a nuclear weapons program is for peaceful purposes only. Although there are many other reasons that would inspire the Iranians to acquire nuclear powers speaking in terms of international affairs. Especially since their biggest “enemy” Israel had not signed the NPT thus excluding them from the obligation not to have nuclear weapons caused a big threat to Iranians, also that the U.S. has these weapons and since relations between the Iranians and them aren’t peachy keen either, Iran would probably feel safer in the international scope and more self reliant if it had nuclear weapons. This entire operation did not sit well with the U.S. who considers Iran to be a major adversary and a cause of danger in the world, especially in the east.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rouhani? What is his goal? What does he pursue with his atomic program, and is it…

    • 1773 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pf con case

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Subpoint A – Nuclear proliferation is an action fueled by fear and if there is increase in military force interference, that fear will be legitimized. According to the article “Why Countries Build Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century” by Zachary Keck, “Iran’s nuclear program is better explained, then, by the rise in the potential conventional threat the U.S. poses to the Iran.” As many countries are, Iran was obviously intimidated by the massive military force of the U.S. and made the decision to begin proliferating nuclear weapons. And if the U.S. uses military force as an act to prevent nuclear proliferation, that goal may not be fulfilled.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For most Americans, the story begins in 1979 with the Iranian Hostage Crisis, when a group of revolutionary university students took over the American Embassy in Tehran, Iran, and held 52 American diplomats, intelligence officers and Marines hostage for 444 days. But for most Iranians, and to fully understand the repercussions of this aforementioned event, the story begins almost three decades prior, in 1953. This was the year that the United States overthrew the recently established democracy in Iran, led by Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh. He had become very popular in the country for having the ambition to finally take advantage of the wealth that Iran needed to grow by nationalizing his country’s oil supply, which was for the previous 50 years under the control of the British Petroleum company. By proving that Mossadegh’s regime was relying on the communist party of Iran for power, and in turn not wanting to lose Iran as an ally in the Cold War against the Soviet Union, England was able to persuade the U.S. to assist in engineering a coup d’état against the new Iranian democracy and return Iran to its previous Pahlavi dynasty. Through what was named “Operation Ajax”, the CIA and MI6 reinstalled the Shah and instituted a pro-U.S. dictatorship of Iran that was willing to comply to Western interests in regards to the vast oil supply that the “British and American corporations had controlled the bulk of almost since their discovery” 1.…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. Destroying Iran’s nuclear plant may prove hard, Critics of a U.S. assault argue that Iran's nuclear facilities are dispersed across the country, buried deep underground and hardened against attack, and ringed with air defenses, making a raid complex and dangerous. In addition, they claim that Iran has purposefully placed its nuclear facilities near civilian populations, which would almost certainly come under fire in a U.S. raid, potentially leading to hundreds, if not thousands, of deaths.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nuclear bomb is dangerous and scary weapon that really should have never been thought of or invented. Nuclear bombs have been the focal point of every country's scientists ever since World War II when the U.S. dropped them on Japan. Just seeing the death and destruction a nuclear bomb can cause to people and the environment just proves my point. Not one person should have the power to just be able to push a button and have the ability to tear another country to shreds.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States should not continue to develop and test weapons of mass destruction because it can kill millions,It's expensive and has lack of morals. On August 6, 1945 Harry S. Truman, had to make a world changing and tough decision. The United States dropped the world’s first deployed atomic bomb all over Japan,Hiroshima.The explosion destroyed 90% of the city and very quickly killed about 80,000 people and later on because of radiation exposure , 10,000 people died. The United States shouldn’t make and test weapons of mass destruction because it’s harmful, costs a lot, and has flaws.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead we should look for tools of peace, methods of tranquility. The United States is devoted to “fight for the common defense” not vaporize and lay to waste its opponent. There is always a better way and we need to go out and find it, because we can no longer live in nuclear…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Before I go any farther, I want to preface my paper with a disclaimer or two. First, I personally do not believe that Iran, as it currently stands, should be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. Iran’s rulers are religious extremists, and they pose a serious threat to the western world. However, I will strive to present an unbiased review of the issue. Secondly, this paper is not meant to be an exhaustive examination of the topic of Iran’s nuclear weapons program. I am a college freshman at the University of Alaska Anchorage, and I wrote this paper for my English 111 class. As such, I had a very limited time period in which I could research Iran and nuclear…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The fear of nuclear devastation has so far created peace and prevented a third world war. Rather than weapons of war, strategic weapons are becoming weapons of intimidation used to influence political and strategic outcomes. The actual likelihood of a nuclear warhead being used becomes slimmer by the day, with non-proliferation treaties, campaigns such as ‘Ground Zero’ and regulations on transporting nuclear weapons becoming stricter and stricter. The publication of a volume edited by…

    • 2202 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Albert Einstein once said, “The explosive force of nuclear fission has changed everything except our modes of thinking and thus we drift towards unparalleled catastrophe. We shall require an entirely new pattern of thinking if humankind is to survive” Albert Einstein, 1946. Nuclear weapons are arguably the most feared weapon ever created. They have the capability to end wars, nations, and even our planet if we are not careful. So, how serious is the threat of a terrorist cell acquiring a nuclear weapon and using it in an attack? Any statement containing the words ‘nuclear and weapon’ must almost always be considered serious but what is the likelihood of a successful nuclear terrorist attack occurring? The answer is anything but straight forward and many different avenues must be explored in order to better understand this current threat.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear weapons have only ever been used once in human history, and that was during World War II when The United States deployed missiles on Japanese territory, in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. At the time of bombing in 1945 only the USA had developed nuclear weapons, whilst today the pool of states consisting of nuclear weapons is still extremely small, with only nine states laying claim to nuclear technology and weaponry. This nuclear proliferation is explained by Darryl Howlett who explains this as the worldwide spread of nuclear weapons. For Howlett states are nuclear driven because of the ‘strategic, political and prestige benefits’ attached to nuclear weapons[1]. In the modern world the mass media are often critical about nuclear weapons and the threats they pose for society, but this begs the question; why have nuclear weapons not been used in conflict since 1945? To answer this question the issues of taboo and deterrence and the arrival of virtual nuclear arsenals must be called into question, as well as theoretical ideas such as rationality from proliferation optimists and proliferation pessimists. I will also look at whether we currently live in a non-proliferation regime, and look at the alternatives for peace and nuclear non-usage.…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If Iran were to obtain nuclear bombs, would there be any stopping the irresponsible, irrational country? With the popular foreign policy being one of proliferation fatalism towards Iran’s nuclear development, several countries in the international community question how a nuclear Iran would respond to threats of harsher sanctions. The issue of a nuclear Iran is extremely important, because several international countries worry how a nuclear Iran would affect Middle Eastern relations. These exaggerated perceptions; however, are exactly what is causing the nuclear buildup in Iran. In “How to Keep the Bomb from Iran”, Scott Sagan argues that crippling preemptive actions would not only stop Iranian nuclearization,…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays