Preview

Cultural Relativism In Lewis Vaughn's Argument

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
202 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cultural Relativism In Lewis Vaughn's Argument
Cultural Relativism is defined in Lewis Vaughn’s “Beginning Ethic: an Introduction to Moral Philosophy” as the view that an action is correct morally if the culture deems it so (pg. 30). This differs from Objectivism, which believes that some moral truths “are valid for everyone” or universal (pg. 29). All cultures have different views on what is right and wrong from a moral standpoint. The beliefs in one place are different in other place because both cultures have different heritages. This does not make the other cultures moral views any less correct than that of you own. Therefore, the concept of cultural relativism true. Supporters of the objectivism would say that having universal truths would prevent, in their view, action deemed morally
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ruth Benedict and Fluehr-Lobban
    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ruth Benedict and Fluehr-Lobban

    Fluehr-Lobban believes that other cultures should have their own moral values. Fluehr-Lobban's main views on cultural relativism is that other cultures should have their own moral values and that we should respect them and educate ourselves about their culture. Cultural relativism states that moral evaluation is rooted in and cannot be separated from the experience, beliefs, and behaviors of a particular culture, and hence, that what is wrong in one culture may not be so in another.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    "Beyond Bumper Sticker Ethics", by Steve Wilson.
    • 2415 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "Beyond Bumper Sticker Ethics", by Steve Wilson.

    The first ethical belief that the author discusses is Cultural Relativism. It talks about the how diversity is becoming more and more apparent between different cultures worldwide. The author mentions that often customs that are unquestioningly accepted in one part of the world are considered abhorrent in another, for example: human sacrifice. Cultural Relativism claims that there are no absolute standards for moral judgment. Basically says that the values that every culture isn't necessarily wrong, just different. I almost completely disagree with this view. The largest problem I have with it rejects absolute truth and its existence. If one were to make the statement "there is no absolute truth," they would have just proven themselves wrong because that is a self-defeating statement.…

    • 2415 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Assess Rachels Critique Of The Main Argument For Normative Cultural Relativism
    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Assess Rachels Critique Of The Main Argument For Normative Cultural Relativism

    In this essay, I will discuss James Rachels’ article “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism”, in which he criticizes the normative cultural relativism argument which is about how different cultures have different moral codes, thus there is no single truth to define “truth” or a correct set of moral codes because the idea of right or wrong varies within cultures. Firstly I am going to explain what the cultural relativism argument is about and then present my assessment of Rachels’ critique regarding this argument from careful…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Shaw: Morality and Ethical Relativism
    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Shaw: Morality and Ethical Relativism

    Shaw gives an obvious and unconvincing example. He compares abortion in two different societies; it is absolutely wrong in Catholic Spain, but widely accepted in Japan. Most readers would agree that this occurs and abortion is a topic that the world will most likely never come to agreeing terms with. Therefore, relativism is actually significant in each culture. Cultural relativism is complicated in that a whole group of people within an area believe in what they've always been told. Shaw gives an excellent example about slavery in the south. Decades ago, it unfortunately existed and it was acceptable in that time period. However, now it is clearly immoral. A relativist would think that it is acceptable because it was part of the culture. It is not steady to keep changing morals through time. So, who distinguishes right from wrong in that whole society in the first place?…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Does The Isolating Block Praise As Well As Blame?
    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Does The Isolating Block Praise As Well As Blame?

    Cultural Relativism is the view that all beliefs, customs, and ethics are relative to the individual within his own social context. Cultural relativists believe that all cultures are worthy in their own right and are of equal value. Diversity of cultures, even those with conflicting moral beliefs, is not to be considered in terms of right and wrong or good and bad. Some believe that morality is relative to culture, but some believe that argument is invalid. Some also argue that there is such a thing as moral isolationism.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Moral Relativism In Trying Out One's New Chores
    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral Relativism In Trying Out One's New Chores

    Moral relativism is one’s perception of what is acknowledged to be morally just or unjust depending on accepted demeanor. Certain behaviors and manners that a specific culture may consider to be acceptable, another culture may consider to be unethical. In such an instance, neither one of the cultures would be incorrect. Morals are culturally defined in that it originates from the root as to what is considered socially acceptable.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cultural Objectivism Research Paper
    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cultural Objectivism Research Paper

    Objective moral truths are truths that exist regardless of an individuals or a group opinion. Subjectivists believe that there are no objective moral truths and that morality is decided by the person. For instance, some objectivists would say that it is an objective moral truth that torturing babies is wrong. While subjectivist believe that it is morally true or morally wrong if one approves or disproves of torturing babies. According to subjectivism, things are either right or wrong according to an individuals attitudes and feelings. Cultural relativism differs from objectivists view on moral truths as it believes also there are no objective moral truths. Cultural relativism believe morality is based on the moral code of a culture. Moral codes…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Evaluate 
Rachel's 
Arguments 
Against 
Cultural
 Relativism
    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Evaluate 
Rachel's 
Arguments 
Against 
Cultural
 Relativism

    Cultural relativism, as defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. “Is the thesis that a person’s culture strongly influences her modes of perception and thought” Most cultural relativists add to this definition saying that there is no standard of morality. This means that morality is relative to the particular society that one lives in. Prominent ethicist James Rachels has written against this view in his work titled The Challenge of Cultural Relativism. This paper will be focused on evaluating Rachels’ critique of cultural relativism, and whether it was right for him to endorse objective moral realism. Rachels defines this as “a standard that might be reasonably used in thinking about any social practice whatever. We may ask whether the practice promotes or hinders the welfare of people whose lives are affected by it.” That is the moral worth of an action is based upon how it contributes to the society from which it operates in.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pojman Ethical Relativism
    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pojman Ethical Relativism

    Ethical Relativism is the belief that nothing is objectively right or wrong and that the meaning of what is right and wrong depends on the individual and culture. Pojman breaks down Ethical Relativism into 2 main concepts: The Diversity Theory and the Dependency Theory. The Diversity Theory addresses the concept of what is morally right and wrong varies from society to society; therefore, there is no universal moral principles that all societies accept. For example, Homosexuality in the Middle East is a forbidden practice, while in ancient Greek culture, it was said to be a accepted practice. The Dependency Theory says that all moral principles receive their validity from cultural acceptance.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare and contrast ethical relativism
    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare and contrast ethical relativism

    Ethical Relativism is defined by Judith A. Boss in ´´ Analyzing Moral Issues´´ as, ´The theory that morality is created by people and that moral systems can be different for different people´´ (g2). So unlike the universal theory, ethical relativists believe that morals evolve as people progress. Moral or ethics change depending on what part of the globe someone is in. Many say that ethical relativism promotes distrust among cultures and people, since morals are not viewed as universal. People in general distrust those who have different ideologies. Relativist use one of these three main principles ethical subjectivism, cultural relativism, and divine command theory to support their arguments.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is Cultural Relativism Always Positive?
    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Is Cultural Relativism Always Positive?

    Cultural relativism is the view that all beliefs, customs, and ethics are relative to the individual within his own social context.. "In other words, “right” and “wrong” are culture-specific; what is considered moral in one society may be considered immoral in another, and, since no universal standard of morality exists, no one has the right to judge another society’s customs."…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is Cultural Relativism
    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page

    What Is Cultural Relativism

    If cultural relativism was true, I think we would have considerably increased cases of war between cultures. Cultures have such…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Moral Relativism
    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Moral Relativism

    Moral relativism is often equated with cultural relativism. However, anthropologists cringe at this notion, as defended by Thomas Johnson in his essay, “Cultural Relativism: Interpretations of a Concept.” Johnson argues that true cultural relativism should not “…prevent an educated person from taking a stand on a variety of moral issues…” (Johnson 794). Rather, cultural relativism is a tool for the objective study of a different culture and leads “…to a much stronger notion of moral values, values that can and should be acted upon…” (Johnson 795). This view differs from Bendedict’s moral relativism in that while cultural relativism is a tool from which moral attitudes and actions may stem, moral relativism maintains all cultures are equal, and therefore all cultures and cultural practices must be tolerated. Benedict is not alone in her biased presumptions. In his article, “In Defense of Relativism,” Frank Oppenheim asserts,…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Cultural Relativism And The Median That Works
    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cultural Relativism And The Median That Works

    Universal values and human rights are abstractions that are considered by many as little more than a romantic concept. Those who would like to believe in a set of universal values find that they either can not find enough evidence for, or that there is too much evidence against such values. Cultural relativism, a relatively new idea in political science that has its origins in anthropology, is the major evidence and argument against global values. Both widely supported and widely attacked, cultural relativity is a doctrine that states "…that the actions of people within each culture should be evaluated according to the rules of that culture." 1 Many countries and cultures use cultural…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Relativism In America
    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral Relativism In America

    Regarding moral relativism, it is difficult for me to say that no moral ideas should exist and individuals should have a right to create their own. This relates to the idea that, “moral truth or justification is relative to a culture or society” (Moral Relativism, 2015). We have laws for everyone to follow so that everyone is not making their own decision as these decisions might infringe on the rights of others. Ruth Benedict argues that morals are not universal but states that, “normality is culturally defined” (Benedict, 1934). She uses the term “normal” to explain what is excepted in different societies. She also states that, “the concept of normal is properly a variant of the concept of the good” (Benedict, 1934). What she is saying is that each society has their own interpretation of what is good or bad.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More