Preview

Comparing Justice Scalia And Justice Breyer

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
398 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Justice Scalia And Justice Breyer
Both Justice Scalia and Justice Breyer agree more than they differ and they agree about nothing so much as the extent to which they agree. Justice Scalia is a conservative and a calls himself an “originalist,” believing that judges should determine the framers’ original intent in the words of the constitution, and stick by what is says. Justice Breyer, on the other hand, is more of liberal, often called a pragmatist. Breyer believes in what he calls the living Constitution, the idea that the values outlined by the framers must be molded to apply to our ever-changing modern society.

During the debate, Breyer comments that his constitutional approach is “complicated,” while Scalia retorts that his is “easy as pie.” Breyer goes on to talk about

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Federalist Dbq

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With respect to the federal Constitution, the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. However, during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison this characterization of the two parties was not so accurate. In the years of 1801 to 1817, both Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, while supporting a strict construction of the constitution, addressed to loose interpretation of the constitution during their presidencies, while the Federalist, originally supporting a broad view, countered the Democratic- Republicans with a literal definition. The presidents both found their original beliefs on the constitution were beginning to change and they found themselves on middle ground.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Which justice, emphasizing his refusal to compromise judicial views, said, “Originalists have nothing to trade!”…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Us V. Fior D'Italia, Inc.

    • 11729 Words
    • 47 Pages

    BREYER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which REHNQUIST, C. J., and STEVENS, O 'CONNOR, KENNEDY, and GINSBURG, JJ., joined. SOUTER, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which SCALIA and THOMAS, JJ., joined, post, p. 2127.…

    • 11729 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King V Burwell Case Study

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Courts rulings have an effect on the fabric of society as well as have an influence in public policy initiatives. Under Congress, federal judiciary is to prescribe to the rules with the obligations to recommend amendments and promote fairness in administration. Judges are not legislators but are rule of the law in proposing rules and recommend alternative proposals. As badly designed laws are being created, the Courts job is to construed the complexity rather than standing with a law that is flawed. Under this ruling, the majority failed to consider parts of the ACA that contradicts its statute, ignoring what the law states straight out. Scalia along with Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito examined the statute being questioned and discredited the majority’s argument. Under their dissent, each exposed how in favor of the administration was playing politics when they pointed out how ACA can’t work if only states instead of federal were involved in tax subsidies. As a result of this ruling, the IRS is over taxing and spending billions more then what Congress intended or…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case was concerning Mr. Martin who suffered from a debilitating disease which made it very painful to walk. In this case he was seeking the legal right to travel in a golf cart when golfing between holes, while in a competition. Scalia and Thomas argued that if they granted Martin the privilege to use the cart that the court was creating a special rule for people with talent and that were disabled. The question became can a man be a considered a golfer is he’s riding in a cart. After deliberation the answer to if he could still be considered a golfer was yes.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brennan states that one of the proposed majority decisions is changed into a dissent before the final ruling is announced, then the Justices will figure out the final form of the opinion. In “Separate but Equal”, a dissent never existed, the Supreme Court just skips it and goes right to writing the final form. This article shows how the Supreme Courts decisions can cause major issues and controversies among the country. “Separate but Equal” proved to be a great example of all the controversies and problems that can result from decisions made by the Supreme Court by dealing with the issue of Segregation in public…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Section 4 Pros And Cons

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Whoever proves the Supreme Court’s decision based on constitutionality wins. The round shall not stray to the effectiveness or benefits of Section 4 and instead should focus on constitutionality.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    well very well stated I thought. I liked the key points John Marshall stated during his arguments,…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antonin Scalia was an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court from September 1986, until February 2016, when he unfortunately passed away. Scalia was born in New Jersey but later moved to Queens in New York (Reilly, 2016). Scalia’s parents were both teachers, which may have been why he was valedictorian when graduating from St. Francis Xavier high school. After high school, he went to Georgetown University, where he also graduated at the top of his class, achieving the honor of valedictorian yet again (Reilly, 2016). Scalia got his bachelor’s degree in history, but wanted to further his education, so he went on to Harvard Law School, where he graduated again as valedictorian of his class in 1960 (Reilly, 2016). After graduating from Harvard Law, Scalia worked in a private practice for just a couple of years, only to discover he would rather be teaching as a law professor at a University, which is what he ended up doing.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, Tribe and Dorf describe our nation’s Constitution as a document that continues to dynamically work to achieve a balance between governmental power and individual liberty. Founding fathers like Madison and Jefferson also look to the constitution as a distinct outline, instead of a blueprint. The amendments and bills that comprise it tend to be very vague and open to interpretation of what some definitions actually mean. This leads to a lot of disputes throughout history of what the Constitution and its words stand for.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lincoln and Brennan’s views on the importance of the Supreme Court differed greatly. Brennan believed the Court was “the last word on the meaning of the Constitution”, while Lincoln asserted the people had a duty to review decisions made by the Court. If the people blindly followed rulings of the Court, “the instant they [Supreme Court decisions] are made…the people will have ceased to be their own rulers…practically resigned their government, into the hands of that eminent…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the dissent, the above claim has only been theorized in dicta, and is unsupported by actual precedent setting holdings. Justice Scalia claims that the Court is once again attempting to create precedent in order to legislate from the bench. Citing numerous cases including Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976) “in a democratic society legislatures, not courts,…respond to…the moral values of the people” the dissent provides evidence for their stance, and highlight the majority’s lack…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judicial restraint theory is based off the idea that judges should limit the exercise of their own power. For example, it would make judges think before shooting down laws, just because they can, with the exception being that they are unconstitutional. The opposite of judicial restraint is judicial activism. Judicial activism is when judges make rulings based on politics or personal beliefs rather than the law itself. The main difference between these two philosophies is judicial restraint is a bit more ethical then judicial activism. Both Clarence Thomas and Sonia Sotomayor are minorities to the Supreme Court. However, they both have very different viewpoints when it comes to how their race and background play a role in their rulings.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that the judicial restraint philosophy is more appropriate for federal judges to follow because, unlike judicial activism, it does not allow judges to expand vague Constitutional principles to fit their own viewpoint and principles. Judicial restraint does not authorize judges to interpret Constitutional texts and laws (conservative or liberal interpretation) in order to serve their own principles, policies, and considered estimates of the vital needs of contemporary society. The judicial restraint policy also ensures that separation of powers is applied justly so that different branches of government do not intervene with the power of the other branch. Also, because the Stare Decisis has a huge impact on future decisions and precedent,…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Decisions

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (Fourth Amendment). The text of the Fourth Amendment does not define exactly what “unreasonable search” is. The framers of the constitution left the words “unreasonable search” open in order for the Supreme Court to interpret. Hence, by looking at the text of the Fourth Amendment, the words “unreasonable search” is very ambiguous and it’s the job of the Supreme Court to delineate the ambiguity of the words. In the case Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), Katz was convicted of illegal wagering based on evidence obtained by attaching a small listening and recording device to the exterior of a public telephone booth that he regularly used for wagering calls (Kanovitz, 2010, p.268). The Supreme Court found that Katz’s Fourth Amendment right was violated by declaring,…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays