Preview

Compare And Contrast Montesquieu And Rousseau

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
821 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Montesquieu And Rousseau
Philosophers have been studying this question for hundreds of years. Hobbes, Rousseau, Locke, Montesquieu and others all have very different ideas of how humanity should organize their government based on the nature of man. Some of those ideals have transferred over into modern societies that are prominent in our world today, while others have kicked the bucket alike their creators. The nature of man can be defined as many things weather it is that man is either good or bad, or something more complicated; Human beings are egocentric and self-interested, so therefore life in the state of nature is short and brutish. The nature of man is much more complicated though and can be defined with an ample meeker broader statement. Baron de Montesquieu believes that all of mankind is born equal. It can be said that this doesn’t define the true nature of human beings, but this transfers into the most common and dominant type of government today which is democracy. Baron de Montesquieu’s ideals most directly translate into a fair and democratic government, and because of this humanity should organize their government in this fashion.
By regarding historical examples of how this style of thinking has succeeded, it can be seen that this the most effective way for a government to be administered. All men and women are born equal and therefore …show more content…
This is the very principle many countries depend on to avoid mass corruption such as the United States of America, Canada, and Great Brittan. Each one of these Governments has an executive branch, legislative branch, and judicial branch. Due to these very facts democracy seems to be the most successful and sustainable type of government at this moment in time, because they are founded upon these three
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis
    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis

    One of these people, Voltaire, preferred democracy as their Method of rule. In document 4 Voltaire expressed his thoughts on leadership “the best government seems to be that in which all ranks of men are equally protected by the laws….” This philosopher is trying to convey his beliefs on democracy and this will get citizens to question the churches methods in the future. The same can be said about document 5, another philosopher john Locke, wrote about his ideas. Both john and Voltaire share the same ideas on government: this is a quote from johns Two Treatises on Government “Men being by nature all free, equal, and independent no one can be subjected to the political power of another without his consent” in this quote he wants the system of government to be centered around the people,…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast John Locke And Rousseau
    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast John Locke And Rousseau

    In years past, the majority of governmental ideas were based on a ruler with absolute power, such as the king or queen of a country. The common belief of the ruling class during the pre enlightenment period was that humans were born dirty, unhealthy, and were generally unable to govern themselves. With a “caring” and “fair” ruler they could be saved from the burden of their own judgement. In contrast, Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke, Baron De Montesquieu, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau thought that people were born pure and only were bad from the “corruption of society”, thus they should have a say in…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In The Federalist No. 51 Analysis
    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In The Federalist No. 51 Analysis

    According to Gregory S. Kavka, “government is necessary to constrain people’s conduct toward one another, because people are not sufficiently virtuous to exercise the requisite degree of control on their own” (G. Kavka). In other words, government is created to control the faults of human nature for example, greediness and unfairness. “Framing a government which is to be administered by men over men” (R. Higgs). However, government is made of men with human faults and will act selfishly for their own gain if necessary. This is why constraints are put on government systems preventing absolute power to reign over citizens. If men were born without faults, if men were born perfect,…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rousseau and the U.S. Government
    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rousseau and the U.S. Government

    Remnants of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's beliefs in human rights, government elected by the masses, and the limited governmental control of the masses can be compared to the methodology of the democratic republic that governs the United States.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What specific contributions did Montesquieu, Voltaire and Diderot make to the age of Enlightenment? Contrast their political ideas with that of Thomas Hobbes
    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What specific contributions did Montesquieu, Voltaire and Diderot make to the age of Enlightenment? Contrast their political ideas with that of Thomas Hobbes

    In Montesquieu's first work, the Persian Letters, he criticized French institutions, especially the Catholic Church and the French monarchy. In this work he wrote about the attack on traditional religion, the advocacy of religious toleration, the denunciation of slavery and the use of reason to liberate humans from their own prejudices.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Civics 11 Notes
    • 5693 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Civics 11 Notes

    Believes that the natural state of humans was once a peace and harmony. He saw democracy as a reflection of our basic sense of fairness and equality…

    • 5693 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    rousseau and Montesquieu on socialization
    • 2269 Words
    • 7 Pages

    rousseau and Montesquieu on socialization

    Jean Jacques Rousseau and Baron de Montesquieu were great philosophers that enlightened the world with their revolutionary thoughts on different forms of government. These two philosophers inspired the debate on the origin, the necessity, and the consequences of the establishment of societies and governmental authorities. They discussed the required conditions for the sustainability of societal institutions. In his book The Persian Letters, Montesquieu makes use of fictional stories to relay his thoughts on various themes including the advantages and the disadvantages of different systems of governments, the nature of political authority, and the proper role of law. Montesquieu believes that if the right type of government is in place, it can prevent a state of war. As an opposing view, evidence in The Discourse on Inequality shows that Rousseau believes that humans are happier in a natural state. He seems to view all societal forms as legitimized chains that would eventually lead to a despotic system of government in which men are in a state of war. Both authors share the view that the sustainability of a society political stability depend on whether or not its system of government is in accord with the law of nature. However, they present two opposing views on whether or not such sustainability is possible. Rousseau sees the presence of society as problematic regardless of the form of government in place whereas Montesquieu views the political authority of the right system of government as a necessity. Therefore we would first present Rousseau’s pejorative perspective on the institution of societies by pointing out its negative influence on natural liberty and equality before comparing it to Montesquieu’s arguments on the necessity of the presence of a monarchial system of government preferably.…

    • 2269 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    James Madison's Contribution to the Enlightenment
    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages

    James Madison's Contribution to the Enlightenment

    The enlightenment era, can be said, produced some of the most critical ideas that clearly impacted the development of democracy. This intellectual period that roughly lasted from the 17th to the 18th century is responsible for producing some of the most brilliant political philosophers. Amongst these philosophers and philosophes were political revolutionaries such as Voltaire, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Cesare Baccaria, Baron de Montesquieu, David Hume, and John Locke. The ideas they promoted and would later be adopted by flourishing democracies included the individual’s freedom of expression and religion by Voltaire, the separation of powers and checks and balances by Montesquieu, rights in the field of criminal justice by Baccaria, federalism by David Hume, and the idea of natural rights by John Locke. One of the most critical enlightenment ideas that contributed greatly to the understanding of the role of government was Rousseau’s social contract. This idea was viewed and generally accepted by many contemporary philosophers and seen as genuine and practical. According to Rousseau, legitimate political authority comes only from a Social Contract agreed upon by all citizens for their mutual preservation. The collective grouping of all citizens, or the “sovereign” he states, expresses the general will that aims for the common good. Thomas Paine further explains this point in his essay Rights of man (1791) by writing that government is not a compact between those who govern and those who are governed, but instead it is a compact between the individuals themselves to produce a government.1 According to both, the general will finds its clearest expression in the general and abstract laws of the state2. Furthermore John Locke viewed the Social Contract as a form of giving legitimacy to a government only through the consent of those whom it governs and that the objective of the government is to protect the individual’s natural rights. Paine further explains that a…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Effectiveness of Checks and Balances
    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Effectiveness of Checks and Balances

    A leader or group of leaders unchecked is chaos waiting to happen. the creators of the Constitution of the United States of America understood this and fear a leader with too much power would return or country to a government like the one we just escaped. This fear and understanding allowed them to crate a government system with three branches that keep each other in check and balance the power of our government.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Does Rousseau's Conception of ‘the State of Nature' Differ from Hobbes'? Essay Example
    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Does Rousseau's Conception of ‘the State of Nature' Differ from Hobbes'? Essay Example

    The term ‘state of nature' is used in political philosophy to describe the condition of human life either in the absence of some form of government, or the lack of laws. The notion itself was initiated by philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) within his book Leviathan, in which it is depicted as "the natural condition of mankind" . The state of nature is a supposed state as opposed to an actual state in that it is believed that humans have always been a part of a structure which could be considered a society, bound by some form of social contract (although some have argued there was in fact a time when humans existed in a true state of nature). The argument put forward by Hobbes is hypothetical and does not base itself on any historical evidence of such a state having ever been occupied by humanity.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Rousseau's Relation With The French Revolution
    • 4813 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Rousseau's Relation With The French Revolution

    According to this testimony, it would seem that Rousseau's influence extended through much of the popular and intellectual sphere. However, it also reached as high as the royal court. In a discourse before the Assemblée Nationale, Louis XVI goes as far as to attribute much of his difficulty in maintaining control of his empire to the wandering philosophe from Geneva:…

    • 4813 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Locke And Thomas Hobbes State Of Nature
    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Locke And Thomas Hobbes State Of Nature

    The idea of the natural human is a topic discussed for centuries. Philosophers for generations asked question regarding the form of government that human beings react best in. In class we examined both Thomas Hobbes and John Locke's theory of the State of Nature which allowed us to see their viewpoints on humankind. Hobbes believes that humans are selfishly motivated and are constantly at war with one another. However, Locke has a more positive outlook. He believes that humans behaved based on the Law of Nature which is given to us by God (hobbeslockedocument). In Locke’s opinion, the State of Nature is free and has the right to life, liberty and property and if people want their rights respected, they should respect others. However, Locke is not delusional, he knows…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Enlightenment Thinkers: Montesquieu, Locke, And Rousseau
    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page

    Enlightenment Thinkers: Montesquieu, Locke, And Rousseau

    The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution was a result of the ideas published by the different Enlightenment thinkers. Some of the Enlightenment thinkers are Montesquieu, Locke, and Rousseau. Montesquieu came up with the separation of powers which influenced there to be a separation of powers in the Constitution. Power is divided up among three branches and those three branches use checks and balances to make sure not one branch obtains too much power. Locke came up with the social contract and natural rights which are “life, liberty, and property” which later influenced Thomas Jefferson to write “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” into the Declaration of Independence. Rousseau put the social contract into action by writing…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain How Much Power Should We Give The Government
    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain How Much Power Should We Give The Government

    The most powerful is represented by the legislative branch, which in turn is made up of two subdivisions that leave votes up to a binary voting system and then a representative majority voting system. I believe this is an excellent solution to govern a large populace it gives the majority a voice, which is a representation of a democracy, and gives a voice to the small vote by leveling each state to the same amount of votes on the other side of the legislative branch. The second most powerful branch, the judicial branch, checks to see if the laws written by the legislative branch are legal and justifiable. And then finally, the executive branch signs the laws into action as a final check on the legislative branch. Each branch has a direct way to debate and potentially nullify the power of the other branch when executing/enacting laws that govern the populace. Assuming there is no corruption, I feel like the 3 branches approach is an amazing way for a government to regulate…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Checks And Balances System: United States Government
    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Checks And Balances System: United States Government

    The three branches of government provide a division of power that abides by the system of checks and balances. Every branch is granted with an exclusive set of powers that can be opposed by another branch if composed inaccurately. This method provides a better system of government under which the general public can live and be part of the democratic republic that defines our country.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More