Preview

Compair and Contrast the Northern and Southern Colonies

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
550 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compair and Contrast the Northern and Southern Colonies
Compare and Contrast of the Northern and Southern Colonies The 1700s was a time when everything was new, new country, unseen land, and more resources. The colonists were still trying to discover all the new and exciting things in this new world, and still live under the king’s rule. The colonies were working hard to support England and themselves in this time; so the north and south spent most of its time figuring out ways to survive. The north and south had two very different methods of earning what they needed to survive. The northern colonist earned their money by commerce and trade. Commerce is a very logical and reasonable way to earn money, in the part of the colonies that they lived. The major ports of trade with England were in the North, due to it being a shorter distance to travel by waterways. But the north wasn’t just known for their ports, they also had many businesses that made the merchants the most powerful group in the north, by the mid 1700s. In addition to ports, and businesses the north had fertile group good for growing a multitude of crops during a certain part of the year. The northern farmers knew how and when to produce wheat, corn, cattle, and hogs.
The southern colonist didn’t have as many options as the northern colonist had to earn a living. The entire south mostly owned plantations and grew major cash crops. In the upper half of the southern region mostly tobacco was grown but in the lower regions rice, and indigo was grown. With the farmers only growing one crop, and not using it for personal use, they had plenty to sell to the north that would then sell and ship it across to England. With all of their selling’s having to do with one crop and having to take care of a lot of land, the south turned to slavery as a way to harvest all of the crops. Slavery was very high in the south and a lot of that had to do with the fact that they were free labor, but also there were not many people in the south to harvest the crops. The south

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The economies of the colonies of Massachusetts and Virginia were centered around different resources, but each colony flourished in its own way. Virginia centered around the fact that land was plentiful, but labor was scarce. Many landowners had large portions of land but not enough workers to cultivate it. In Massachusetts, the land was not fertile so their economy centered around the fishing and ship making industries. Therefore, Massachusetts’s most profitable resources were timber and fishing. Land was less fertile in Massachusetts due to the harsh climate and short growing season. One thing that helped Massachusetts economy was that they could also take out the “middle man” when trading by using their own ships and merchants. Due to the fertile land in Virginia, their most profitable resource was tobacco. Virginia’s land was fertile due to the warm climate and immense rainfall. Virginia had plenty of staples to exchange for English goods. The Massachusetts colony had a lack of staples for exchange,…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Southern colonies were concentrated in the achievement of wealth. As a result they based their economy in agriculture gaining more terrain. The South had enormous cash crops of mostly tobacco and rice and not enough employees to work in it. Considering that slavery was cheap it was the answer for success for this southern businessmen. Northern colonies were less interested in gaining wealth than they were more concerned with creating a heaven for the practice of their religion. For this reason, exploiting agriculture was not a priority. In fact, salves work doing “soft duties” even as servants or housekeepers in family…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economics of these colonies varied due to the area in which these colonies were located. Virginian economics were based on a cash-crop industry. This helped lead to the importing of slaves from Africa. Due to this importation of slaves there was a drastic divide in the social structure of Virginia, resulting in a three-layered society. Slaves were at the bottom, small farmers and laborers were in the middle, and wealthy plantation owners were at the top. Society in New England was not nearly as layered. The majority of families occupied what we today call the “middle class”. Although many New England families did own slaves, they typically owned only one or two.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Benjamin Franklin says that some strengths the colonies have are that they want the best for their country (which they consider to be apart of Great Britain), in the sense that they want glory, power, and business for the king. “The inhabitants of are, in common with the other subjects of Great Britain,” Franklin likely sees this as a strength because to be British is to be of importance. This is because the British saw themselves as intelligent and well-mannered people and saw others, for example, the native americans, not as good as the British. To have something in common with a group of people who’re seen as great is a strength.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the seventh century, Europeans established colonies in North America. The English colonies were originally established because proprietors from England were granted charters to settle and govern lands. Other European colonies were established around trading posts. Over time, the English gained control of the thirteen colonies through force or purchase; eventually, by regions were known as the Southern, Middle and New England colonies. Although the colonies were under the control of the English and had many commonalities, each region created a distinct culture. These similarities and differences can be evidenced when comparing the role of African Americans, a role of women, and types of settlers of the Middle colonies and The Southern…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Northern soil was in favor of small farms and less agriculture than the South, but industry flourished throughout the North due to an abundance of natural resources (North and South). With no nearby slave trading companies either; the north was more inclined to promote free-labor. On the other hand, the Southern warm climate and soil favored large plantations to grow crops such as tobacco and cotton that required a lot of manpower to produce (North and South). Also, the slave trade was very ample around the Southern states. With places such as the West Indies harboring many slave trading companies the Southern people could obtain slaves easily to work their expansive farms and plantations.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New England colonies and the Southern colonies are slightly similar in some aspects, but drastically different in most. For example the new england colonies were strictly puritan and they did not tolerate any other religion but the southern colonies were not dominated by a single religion which gave way to more liberal attitudes and some religious freedom. The economy of New England was powered mostly the manufacturing in factories, whereas the Southern colonies’ economies were more agriculturally based. The social structures were different, because the New England colonies didn’t believe in slavery, so the social ladders were not the same. Religious tolerance was another major difference in these two regions. Overall the New England and Southern colonies are slightly similar, but their differences set them apart from each other.`…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What were the similarities and differences in the founding of the northern and southern English colonies? The major similarity of the founding of each colony was the reasoning the people were coming over in the first place. They were all looking for better lives economically. The differences were the northern colonies were mainly looking for freedom politically and religiously. The southern colonies were just looking for an all-around better scale of life. The people from the southern colonies came over with adventure on their minds instead of religion or politics.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To the immigrants, the colonization of the south was a chance to have religious freedom, to find gold and to have good trade. For some it was a getaway from the debt that they had collected over the years as well for the poor. The south was established in the year of 1607 by Virginia. It was soon followed by Maryland, the Carolinas and Georgia. From these opportunities, three social groups were created. These were the Great Planters, Yeoman farmers, and Frontier Families. These groups made up the social and economic structure of the south.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Northern and Southern colonies had many similarities between the years of 1607 to 1763, but the idea that they were more similar than different is vastly incorrect. The economy in the Southern colonies was based off of planting and slave labor, which was very common, while land in the Northern colonies, for the most part, was not fertile enough to support planting. Another difference between the North and South was that government and the church had very close ties in the North, compared to a representative self-government in the South, separate from any church. People and towns were too far apart for churches to flourish in the South, whereas in the North, religion was very important and often taken to extremes.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The three distinct ways the northern colonies differed from the southern during early years of the of the U.S development were views on slavery, foreign trading policies, and political views. The southern states believed it was their way or no way, opposed to any political views that they didn’t agree upon. The whisky rebellion era is another area that distinctly differentiates beliefs of the northern colonies from the southern. The southern colonies still believed in having slaves, whereas the northern colonies believed “all men are equal” becoming more diverse of the two regions. Although the northern states weren’t concerned with the loss of slavery, as the south was. The main concern for them was the foreign trading policy to advance…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1600’s a social difference that the North & the South had was slave labor, the North did not depend on it like the South did. Most the of people in the North were families of Puritans, Dutch, & Quakers that operated their own farms and business, unlike the South most of their groups were people seeking to gain wealth. The Northern colonies, Puritans and Quakers based their societies of the bible, women were granted education, and young men were expected to earn a career on trade or work towards religious or political. Colonists in the South created a society based on farming, wealthy plantation owners controlled the economy, they also controlled the social and political life of the south. People in the South lived in large farms,…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New England, southern, and middle colonies were all extremely different. For example, slavery was extremely more prominent in some places than others. Some colonies’ religion was more diverse, nevertheless everyone’s life was centered around religion. How would you feel if your life was practically controlled by your religion? Some of the reasons settlers established colonies in North America were because people wanted a place to practice their religion freely, the colonies were a refuge for the indentured servants, or businessmen wanting to gain money from North America’s resources. While mostly similar in the hunt for religious freedom, profits, and refuges,…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Differences between the three colonies are distinct. The New England and Middle colonies acquire an identical social structure compared to the South, which has slaves and indentured servants. The New England and Middle colonies dislike discrimination because of their lifestyle, which designates man as equal in God’s eyes. Another dissimilarity is religious toleration. Although the New England colonies have an equal social structure, they do not endure those who possess a different faith other than a Puritan lifestyle. The Middle colonies possess a strong certitude for religious freedom. This is shown in their welcoming of other people of different faiths. The South also possesses some form of religious toleration for others. The economy of the colonies is also different. The New England colonies have a manufacturing type of economy because of the infertile land compared to the Southern colonies, which has a farm-based economy. The environment impacted the economy and agriculture in the New England Colonies; farming was not as important for making a living because of climate and geography. The environment also impacted the economy and agriculture of the Southern Colonies; farming was an important way to make a living because of its climate and geography. The differences between the New England Colonies and the Southern Colonies in agriculture included the climate and geography. The New England Colonies looked to their natural resources as a way to make a living; the environment forced them to look for other ways to make a living other than farming. The Southern Colonies didn't develop all their natural resources as a way to make a living; there was excellent soil for farming income, so there was no need to develop natural resources for manufacturing. The differences in manufacturing occurred between the Southern Colonies and the New England Colonies: The Southern Colonies developed their main natural resource, their farmland, and not much manufacturing; the…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The resources available to the northern colonies were completely different from the resources that were available to the southern colonies. In the northern colonies, due to the climate and geography of their land, crop growth wasn’t as successful as it was in the south. The could weather and rocky land made it hard for them so as time went on, the northern colonies became more of an industrial people and relied more on manufacturing things like naval equipment and rum. A few of the northern colonies participated in what they called a triangular trade system where New England traded rum for slaves from Africa and then these slaves were given to the west indies in exchange for sugar and molasses, which was made into rum again. The northern colonies heavily relied on this system and it was this that brought New England success. In the south, the climate was mainly warm and perfect for crop growth so the southern colonies became more agricultural. The main reason the south had such great success in the area of crop growth was because they discovered a great cash crop called tobacco. Due to it’s addictive nature and great taste, the demand for it was very high. The south purchased tons of slaves because farmers relied on slavery to help the success of their farms and crops. They were different from the northern colonies in this way because the north rarely used slaves. They merely transported them.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays