Preview

Bolshevik Revolution

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2405 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bolshevik Revolution
The Bolshevik Revolution and World War I

Abstract: The purpose of this essay is to analyze the causes of the Bolshevik Revolution in October 1917 using academic sources. Through social, economic, and political factors, one can guarantee that the Great War was a major cause of the revolution.
The Bolshevik revolution was one of the most pivotal events of contemporary European history in the 20th century. The ousting of the Tsarist regime, which also became known as Red October as a part of the greater Russian Revolution of 1917, took place on October 25th 1917 with an armed revolt. The First World War was still actively being fought as the coup d’état took place. Initially, Russia under Tsar Nicholas II had sided with the United Kingdom and France in the Triple Entente. However, the war played an incremental role in Russian affairs, giving the people an incentive to seek vast changes in their government. After the country’s establishment of the short-lived Provisional Government, it was overthrown by the Bolsheviks in Petrograd. World War I was the key factor that ignited the Bolshevik revolution, because it gave momentum to Lenin’s movement, it partly caused an economic calamity in Russia, and the downturn of the war pushed the Russians into revolution.
Vladimir Lenin, the leader of the Bolshevik party during the revolution and possibly the most prominent communist visionaries of the 20th century, had gained support for his ideology through World War I. In 1916, Lenin wrote Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, which was a theoretical work outlining capitalism as a world system. Lenin suggested that in order to pursue a greater profit than what domestic resources permit, a global financial system would be created by capitalist nations. This would cause the division of labour to spread internationally through imperialism and colonialism, as Lenin wrote, “Imperialism emerged as the development and direct continuation of the fundamental characteristics



Cited: 3. Edger, Christopher, The Imperial Russian Army of 1914, (2006): http://militaryhistory.suite101.com/article.cfm/the_imperial_russian_army_of_1914 4 5. Lenin, Vladimir, Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism, New Delhi: LeftWord Books (2000) 6 7. Smele, Jonathan, War and Revolution in Russia, (2009): http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwars/wwone/eastern_front_01.shtml 8 9. Woods, Alan, Bolshevism: The Road to Revolution, Wellred Publications (1999) -------------------------------------------- [ 1 ]. V. L. Lenin, Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, 1916, pp. 34 [ 2 ] [ 5 ]. Allan Wildman, The End of the Russian Imperial Army, vol. 1 (1980): pp 76–80 [ 6 ] [ 7 ]. William G. Rosenberg, Slavic Review, Russian Labor and Bolshevik Power After October (1985) pp. 215 [ 8 ] [ 9 ]. Alan Woods, Bolshevism: The Road to Revolution, Part 6: The Year of Revolution (2007): http://www.marxist.com/bolshevism-old/part6-1.html [ 10 ] [ 13 ]. Dr. Jonathan Smele, War and Revolution in Russia (2009): http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwars/wwone/eastern_front_01.shtml [ 14 ] [ 15 ]. Christopher Edger, The Imperial Russian Army of 1914, (2006): http://militaryhistory.suite101.com/article.cfm/the_imperial_russian_army_of_1914 [ 16 ] [ 17 ]. G.D.H. Cole, Soviet Studies (1952), pp. 142

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To write her book Ivan’s War, Catherine Merridale had to face the challenges of moving past the collective memory surrounded Russia’s involvement in World War 2. Merridale navigates that remaining available sources in her search to find the truth of the Red Army. Using a variety of inventive research techniques, Catherine Merridale acquires the historic data the see need to weave these accounts of the war, into the few central characters in her book. Merridale focuses on constructing an image of the Red Army the truly shows Russia for what is was between 1939 and 1945. She does this while proving the importance of personal experiences to the retelling of history.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia’s industrialisation as a result of the reforms of 1891 proved crucial in the fall of the old order. After Witte’s reforms of the late 1890s the population of Petrograd doubled between 1890 and 1910. With the working population in the cities it gave revolutionary groups the advantage of having a large group of frustrated workers in a confined space. In relation to the events of 1917 February revolution the population density allowed the numbers participating in the violent revolts to reach colossal numbers. With the Tsar on the war front, the masses persuaded the soldiers to join the revolutionary forces and by the time he came back, it was too late. Cities such as Petrograd and Moscow weren’t designed for the population increase, and as such workers were living in crowded dirty, overcrowded apartments. These living conditions lead to the frustrations throughout the revolutionary groups. Witte’s reforms converted a large portion of peasants into proletariat. As the tension raised in 1917 that same industrial working class responded with strikes. The strikes started by the Pulitov Steal workers on the 18th of February 1917 started out with one company, but the frustration with the Tsar wasn’t just in one factory. In exactly 12 days one strike had turned into a revolution the reason was that the reforms of Witte and Stolypin .With the peasants now in factories it ment they lacked farmers and had nobody to farm the good harvests in the war years, in fact the harvests of 1915 and 1916 were the best of the century. Without the food to feed a starving nation, the Russian government was in trouble and with this Wittes reforms that were designed…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nonetheless, with the release of the “April Theses” by Lenin, the Bolsheviks support grew. The “April Theses” pushed what Lenin thought Russia needed most at that time: ‘Peace, Bread and Land.’ This vastly appealed to masses of the lower working class of Russia; they had been exhausting this for years; the mass famine across Russia, the land controversy’s that exploited the peasant populace, which approximately made up 80% of the Russian population, and the continuation of the war, which…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under many aspects it is arguable that the 1905 Revolution and the March 1917 Revolution in Russia were very similar. Both years found the country still struggling from a war (one bringing humiliation and the other incomprehension and outrage); both found hostility from the streets directed against perceived governmental incompetence. Yet something had changed from 1905 to 1917 for Tsarism not to be able to survive the second revolution like it did the first. The reasons are to be researched in the impact that World War 1 had on the country, the October Manifesto issued by Nicholas II on 1905, and the loyalty that the population and the Armed Forces were not willing to give the Tsar anymore.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Romanov Dynasty held the Russian Empire as one of the most powerful European states for over three centuries. In 1917, during Nicholas II’s contradictory reign, a revolution began that transformed the empire into the first ever communist nation, replacing the infamous autocratic rule and introducing the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.…

    • 2229 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    On 24th October 1917 the Lenin and the Bolsheviks led a revolution in Russia. The Bolshevik Red Guards led a revolution against the Provisional Government by seizing control of stations, telephone exchanges, post offices, the national bank and the Winter Palace in Petrograd. Now Lenin set about creating the world’s first communist state. Although he was a strong influence, he was not solely responsible for the outbreak of revolution. There are other important causes of the Bolshevik seizure of power, such as the weakness of the Provisional government and Kerensky’s mistakes. Also other important factor was the actions of Trotsky and the timing and luck of the Bolsheviks. However, Lenin was, to a large extent, crucial to the Bolshevik seizure of power because he presented his April thesis, which gave the people of Russia an awakening to the communist aim.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many reasons why the Bolsheviks gaining power in Russia, in 1917. Many were to do with how the Bolsheviks became popular in the years leading up to 1917. These long term causes started very early, this was mainly because the Russians disliked the Tsar very much because of many things, for example of the ongoing resentment and cruel treatment to peasants, and poor working conditions. The Russians were also disgruntled with the food shortages and military failures and the fact that they face humiliating losses in the Russo-Japanese war, then the Bloody Sunday and the Revolution of 1905. They were fed up of the poverty and economic crisis they were facing between themselves and their hatred was growing, and to top it off Tsarist troops fired on an unarmed troop, further dividing the Tsar from his people. At this time, Russians were waiting for their beacon of light, and there was Lenin promising ‘Peace, Bread and Land’, this was the perfect opportunity for the Bolsheviks to promote themselves. The Bolsheviks had been promoting themselves by producing, illegally, newspapers, leaflets and posters which would help support their cause. The Bolsheviks also supported the idea of communism, where everyone is treated equally including women. Many Bolsheviks also went to prison for these actions, which made them look…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vladimir Lenin was an outstanding figure of significance during the Russian Revolution. Under his strong leadership and with the help of his loyal followers, Lenin enabled the Bolsheviks to come into power, overturning the Provisional Government in the second revolution of the year. This has long been regarded as an important factor that contributed to this seizing of power. However, it is not the sole reason, nor is it the most important one, with two others being the incompetence of the Provisional Government and the poor military leadership of Kerensky. This essay will proceed to show how the leadership of Lenin acted as a trigger factor, with the poor military leadership of Kerensky being an aggravating factor, and the incompetence of the Provisional Government as the underlying factor and therefore the most significant factor contributing to the October revolution in 1917. This essay will discuss each factor in detail, before coming to a conclusion that the incompetence of the Provisional Government was the main reason why the Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 after the revolution had taken place.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1917 was a year of infinite importance for Russia, as their country would never be ruled in the same way again. Countless strikes, demonstrations and rebellions were constantly being put down through the use of force, and the unsettlement throughout the citizens was stirring, becoming more and more of a threat to the autocratic rule. Although, a great deal of the blame for the revolution was put on the Tsar, there were many different factors that contributed to the fall of the Tsar in 1917. The military failures, the role of the Tsarina and Rasputin, along with the growing difficulties and discontentment in the large cities, and the Tsar’s failure to make any political reforms, all contributed to his imminent demise.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    During 1917 the political system of Russia, and the political opinions of its public, began to change. The First World War was deeply taking its toll, with the casualties running into millions, and food shortages were reaching crisis levels across Russia. Presided over by the Provisional Government, who had little support and even less real power, the people of Russia became restless. In October, the animosity between Government and populace came to a head, and a revolution put Lenin’s socialist Bolshevik party in power. This essay will show that, while the Bolshevik party was dedicated and driven in the values they believed in, it was only the seizing of opportunity, and a lot of luck, that they succeeded in taking power.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    gov’t & get Russia out of the war Bolshevik Revolution * Bolsheviks gained power in local soviets, slogan “Peace, Land, & Bread” gained supporters * Bolshevik red guards took over gov’t offices & arrested prov. gov’t * Bolsheviks in power: deal with inheritied problems…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why did Revolution break out in Russia in 1905? In 1905, thousands of people gathered outside the Winter Palace, demanding change and immediate reform. Although their revolt was ultimately unsuccessful, it is important to wonder why many people were disgruntled with the Tsarist regime. It can be argued that 1905 revolution resulted in both long-term and crucial short term factors: the long-term factors which will be discussed are peasant land-hunger, the declining economy and the exploitation of Jews. For the first factor, I will begin by discussing the reign of Alexander II to Nicholas II; this will allow us to show the developments in time of peasant outrage. Secondly, the essay will discuss the reign of Alexander III who began terrible pogroms towards Jews and continued by Nicholas II, specifically the great pogroms of the early 1900’s. For the third area, the deteriorating economy created high unemployment and instability within the country. The key short term areas to discuss are: the disgruntlement of the working classes, Russo-Japanese war affected the social classes; it made people realise that Russia was possibly still a backward country because she lost the war; the trigger factor was Bloody Sunday which was the limit for many Russians because the protesters were shot dead by the Red Guard. It is also important to understand why each Tsar introduced certain policies, for a larger context. Thus, there are a variety of long-term and short-term factors to discuss. Let us firstly consider the long-term problem of peasant land hunger which led to the 1905 revolution. To understand this fully, it is crucial we look at the reign of Alexander II, Alexander III and Nicholas II which will allow us to analyse the changes and developments in time. The historian Maureen Perrie argues that the origins of the 1905 revolution can be traced back to the reign of Alexander II; she specifically points to the role of the peasantry arguing the involvement of the peasantry…

    • 4215 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    History has demonstrated that Russia was a militarily weak nation with a poor sense of nationalism by its vast peasant class. The following research paper will discuss four areas of historiography. First, How did historians shortly following the time document and view the tactic of retreating from WWI and the influences that affected that decision? Specifically, did historians view this as protectionism, fear of annihilation by the Western powers, a Czar’s political strategy to stabilize while the world was in turmoil or was the political instability in Russia too overwhelming for the support of military for participation? Secondly, when did the western historians begin to challenge or debate the same influences? How did both of these groups elucidate the primary data, what lenses were used to view the data, and what were the influences on objectivity that each historian experienced? Thirdly, who were the communist party sanctioned historians and what publications and sources were available to be critiqued? Finally, What are the revisionist positions and did the communist historians change any historiography following the fall of communism? Throughout this research, the historiographical methods, lenses, and pressures on objectivity will be compared and contrasted among each…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tsarist Regime

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Military failures, due to rampant nepotism, caused Russia heavy losses in both tactical position and the deaths of 1,700 million men (Mougel, 2011). This caused mass hatred for the Tsar, and his officials. In August 1915, Tsar Nicholas assumed control of the army and as a result was therefore “personally responsible” for his military failures (????). The strain the War placed on the economy and supply lines caused very poor living conditions in Russia (Wormald, 2017). Those living in Moscow and Petrograd experienced many food shortages, prices for daily amenities inflated exponentially, and all of the built up resentment was directed towards the Tsar (????). At the same period in time Bolshevik and Menshevik policies were becoming more popular with the gradually radicalising population, Socialist propaganda was spread across the front, illustrating the Tsar as a puppet of the Germans (Malone, 2004) and Tsarina Alexandra (Nicholas II’s wife) as a German spy (Wormald, 2017). The impact of the Tsar’s poor military decisions, and its subsequent effect on Russian society coupled with the rise of socialist support crippled Tsarism beyond…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays