Preview

Are Juries Fair?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
13512 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Are Juries Fair?
Are juries fair?

Cheryl Thomas

Ministry of Justice Research Series 1/10 February 2010

Are juries fair?

Cheryl Thomas

This information is also available on the Ministry of Justice website: www.justice.gov.uk/publications/research.htm

Constitution and Access to Justice – Analytical Services supports effective policy development and delivery within the Ministry of Justice by providing high-quality social research, statistics and economic analysis to influence decision-making and encourage informed debate.

© Crown Copyright 2010.

Extracts from this document may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes on condition that the source is acknowledged.

First Published 2010

ISBN: 978 1 84099 326 4

Acknowledgements
Research with juries rightly carries concerns about protecting the secrecy of deliberations, and I am especially grateful to Her Majesty’s Courts Service (HMCS) for facilitating my work with jurors at courts in London, Nottingham and Winchester, and to the jury officers, court managers and judges at these courts for their assistance. Nigel Balmer, UCL Faculty of Laws and Legal Services Research Centre, played a key role in modelling the analysis of CREST data in this report and made an important contribution to the study. Given the scope of the study and its implications for the criminal justice system, a special Project Steering Group was convened from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), HMCS, Office for Criminal Justice Reform (OCJR), the judiciary, Attorney General’s Office and Home Office (HO), and I am grateful to all the members for providing invaluable advice on the research. The report also benefited greatly from advice and comments from: Miranda Hill, Lydia Jonson, Gary Hopper, Mike Ainsworth, John Marais, David Perry QC, Dr David Lagnado, Marc Davies, Tim Strouts, John Samuels QC, Tina Golton and three anonymous peer reviewers. Kevin Dibdin oversaw the provision of CREST data and Rachel Thomas helped collect data in the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Trial By Jury
    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Trial By Jury

    Juries don’t have to provide any reasoning, making it exceedingly tough to distinguish whether juries have truly understood the evidence in order to acquire a just verdict. Monitoring a juror’s attitude and how seriously they are taking their duty is also, in essence, unachievable due to the Contempt of Court Act 1981. The act states it is inadmissible of the court “to obtain, solicit or disclose any statements made, opinions expressed, arguments advanced or votes cast” (Dodd, 2012). Consequently, section 8 makes any justifiable investigation into jury deliberation very…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary: Mock Juries
    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary: Mock Juries

    To study the decision making of juries mock juries and shadow juries are used ( i.e. ‘real’ juries are not used as this is banned by law). Mock juries do a role play of a case, shadow juries observe a real case then discuss guilt/innocence but their opinion is not given to the real court. In mock juries variables such as the characteristics of the defendant can be controlled, however the group may not be representative of a randomly selected jury, scenarios may not be as complex as those in reality and the situations lack consequences – they are not true to life (lacking ecological validity).…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain How The Law Reflects Moral And Ethical Standards In Relation To The Use Of Juries
    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain How The Law Reflects Moral And Ethical Standards In Relation To The Use Of Juries

    However, the Jury Act 1977 (NSW) also enables certain groups of citizens to be exempt from jury service such as members of the clergy and those in full time care of a sick, infirm or disabled person, meaning that often, a jury is composed mainly of senior and unemployed citizens, which is not a true representation of the different demographics of the community, as well as it’s standards. Therefore, the law greatly reflects moral and ethical standards in relation to the use of juries, as it allows an accused to be judged by their peers, however, these standards may also be narrowed down due to the ability of certain citizens to opt…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Are Juries Outdated
    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Why Are Juries Outdated

    Juries have been regarded as the cornerstone of our criminal justice system in Australia since 1824 when juries were first introduced, however many argue they are an outdated form of determining the outcome of trials. Some of the reasons why juries are outdated are that jurors don’t realise how long some trials go for and there are too many complex documents to consider in coming up with a verdict of some trials. Another reason is the people that serve on juries are the least qualified people.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men: the Imperfections Inherent in the American Jury System
    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    12 Angry Men: the Imperfections Inherent in the American Jury System

    Twelve Angry Men is a wonderful film that dramatizes the "imperfections" inherent in the American jury system. Simultaneously, it delivers the powerful message that because we are human beings and not machines, it is in the nature of things that justice demands such a system.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    juries
    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    juries

    Juries are considered to encompass a fundamental role of the criminal justice system, however , there are setbacks regarding their role in determining whether the accused is guilty or innocent. Juries are a representation of public confidence, as the right to be tried by peers has people confident that their impartiality and fairness does improve access to justice. Impartiality of the jury is supported by the process of random selection which usually result in a cross-section of society, therefore prejudices are…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Decision Making of Juries
    • 4552 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Decision Making of Juries

    In an ideal world, a jury would be made up of unbiased and unprejudiced people, intelligent enough to comprehend the evidence and with the necessary verbal and social skills to contribute to discussion. In the real world however, research has shown that jury verdicts are influenced by irrelevant aspects of the defendant such as their physical attractiveness, gender, race and even their accent.…

    • 4552 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Is the Court System Fair?
    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Is the Court System Fair?

    New York Times Paper. (December 28, 2011). Justice and Prosecutorial Misconduct, Correction Appended. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Role of the Jury System in Criminal Trials: Is It Still Relevant in Today's Society?
    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Role of the Jury System in Criminal Trials: Is It Still Relevant in Today's Society?

    The jury system has been in our legal system for hundreds of years. It was first established in the 1215 Magna Carta, later in the 1679 Habeus Corpus Act and now in s80 of the Australian constitution. The jury system has played an important role in the legal system and has laid out a defining role for each aspect involving the judiciary system. In the following essay I will be disclosing the relevance and necessity that juries play in the Australian legal system. I will also discuss, what the advantages and disadvantages are by having a jury trial.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mental Shortcuts
    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mental Shortcuts

    Jurors are a fundamental part of the legal system, and the role of this position is to listen to evidence presented during a trial, and decide on the guilt of the defendant (Queensland Courts, 2014). It is important this decision is based on factual evidence from the trial and not other information, prejudices or biases, or on widespread and oversimplified portrayals of particular groups, known as stereotypes. The use of mental shortcuts, or heuristics, within jurors can mean that a decision of guilt is based on social categorisation, such as gender or race, and the corresponding stereotypes rather than on facts (Hornsey, 2014).…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Conformity Of The Jury System
    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Conformity Of The Jury System

    Introduction Jury system is originated in Ancient Rome, the 12 jurors had to be good male Roman citizen. Females, children, the elderly and slaves were excluding in jury system. The duty of jury was to investigate crime and judge the accused people. It symbolized a high level of democracy which involved citizen in the legal system and transparency of judicial power. Australia today still continuous the jury system in the district court and supreme court.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Jury System
    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Jury System

    The Jury System is a worldwide legal system aimed to determine the genuine facts of an issue in a lawsuit, however many individuals strongly oppose the efficiency and accurateness of the jury system, adopted by the English during the middle ages. The jury system exists to bring law to common sense and the through the judgement of the community, as well as considering the values and standards of the state. Nevertheless, there are current debates on whether the jury system should be held accountable for determining the verdict of one’s charge is questionable, as many factors follow the opposing factors. Jury selection is obtained through selecting and informing random individuals from the same community, provided if the individual is absent of criminal offences, and within the appropriate age group. There is a fine line between a summary offence and an indictable offence,…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Cases Review Commission
    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Criminal Cases Review Commission

    Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) is an independent body that was set up in March 1997 in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, under the Criminal Appeal Act (CAA) 1995. This body in the past was an experiment which could challenge a criminal conviction or sentence after the court process has finished and it still exists in the present in the English Legal System. This Commission can refer possible cases of miscarriages of justice to the attention of the Court of Appeal to prevent the possibility from miscarriages of justice that had occurred in cases like the Birmingham Six and the Tottenham Three. However, the Criminal Cases Review Commission does not have main power to carry out investigation and instead they rely on the police for this aim; this is doubtful whether the commission is fully effective (Slapper, G. and Kelly, D. 2012-2013).…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop and Search Powers
    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stop and Search Powers

    Slapper, Gary, and David Kelly. The English Legal System Thirteenth Edition 2012-2013. Oxon: Routledge, 2012.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Jury Trial
    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Jury Trial

    Jury is undoubtedly part and parcel to the essence of a fair trial in the context of the English Legal system or in a wider context, the common law system. So what are juries? And what are their contributions to the English Legal system? The word ‘jury’ derived from Anglo-French, ‘Jure’ which means ‘sworn’. Historically, the modern concept of jury has its roots from old Germanic tribes which a council of men were used to judge the accused. In Anglo-Saxon England, the role of juries is to investigate crime. Post Norman Conquest period, Jury service was used to assist in crime investigation. The modern jury conquest derived from this custom during the 12th century of King Henry’s reign. The Magna Carta, a document which regarded as the first legal document that upholds Human Rights later on provided for the implementation of Juries, and its practice was established absolutely following the trial of William Penn in the year 1670 . The practice of use of jury in trials is one of the key traits of the English legal system and also the common law system. Now a bench of jury consists of 12 independent men (or women) with no previous knowledge of the case and the parties deciding solely based on the evidence presented in court. This article focuses on the position of jury in times of the digital era where social media is prominent throughout our daily life.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics