Preview

Analyze The Causes Of Shay's Rebellion Between 1786 And 1787

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
467 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyze The Causes Of Shay's Rebellion Between 1786 And 1787
During the years 1786 and 1787 a series of protests erupted from american farmers against the Government named Shays Rebellion. The farmers were angry at state and local taxes where they developed debts. This event, although not a big threat, raised concern over the Articles of Confederation, and later be brought up with the establishment of the constitution. Despite the ease of stopping Daniel Shay and his followers, the rebellion questioned both the state and national government power. This issue would remain a prominent issue when the framers were crafting the constitution. The Founding Fathers feared that giving states too much power would cause them to disregard the federal government; and if the feds had too much power, it would be seen as tyranny. The last thing they wanted was to be like Great Britain, ruled under an oppressive king. Therefore, the framers …show more content…
Slavery was very prominent in the south, and in order to please southern states, the founding fathers allowed slave trade to continue until 1808 (which wouldn't be in effect until 20 years after the constitution was ratified). Some of the framers themselves owned slaves, however they understood this was not a good thing for the country. They had to appease the south, because if they just banned slavery then the south would have not ratified the constitution. The founding fathers began to see tension between abolitionists and proslavery supporters, thus fearing a division between the two. The framers attempted to create early unity between the two, however it crumbled leading to the civil war.

Ultimately, the framers legitimately feared both division between the north and south, as well as our nation falling under a monarchy. With that being said, their actions were justified in trying to handle these fears, however, lacked many components and were very incomplete which is why issues still remained within the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shays’ Rebellion can be considered a dispute with New England farmers and tradespersons that upset the new republic plunging the disconnected states to the brink of a civil war. The rebellion started in 1786 in Massachusetts and eventually spread into neighboring states finally crowning in a fruitless attack on a federal armory in Springfield. The rebellion began to wind down in 1787 most likely due to the election of a new governor that demonstrated a good example of local political conflict in the shadows post-revolution. Outlying factors that I believe played a role in the decline of the rebellion as well would be an economic upturn and the creation of…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shay’s Rebellion is a rebellion started by Daniel Shay in Massachusetts between 1786 and 1787. Daniel Shay was a Revolutionary War veteran and led four thousands rebels in a rebellion against economic and civil rights injustices. In 1787, Shay’s army marched into the United States Armory in Springfield to steal its weapons and to overthrow the government. Shay was unsuccessful however. This rebellion was in a political climate where reform of the Articles of Confederation was seen by people as something that was necessary to do. The rebellion affected the debates at the United States Constitutional Convention and shaped the new government. It drew George Washington out of retirement, which lead to him serving the United States as the first…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rob Heaney dbq 11 3

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the first main issues that required compromise to create a reasonable solution was the enactment of tariffs on the south. The main export of the south was cotton. Cotton was what supplied the south with almost all of its money. In about 1828 to 1833 the first major conflict between the north and south was created during the Tariff or Nullification Crisis. In 1828, the North enacted a tariff on the south that severely affected their cotton trade. The tax rates were as high as forty five to fifty percent. The tariffs were nicknamed the "Tariffs of Abominations" because the south was so disgusted at the high rates it was facing. The south spoke out against these high rates and the north lowered the tariff rates to thirty three percent. Despite lowering the tariff, South Carolina decided that they were not going to follow the tariff, and not pay it. The reasoning the state had was that they thought they should not have to follow any sort of law or tax that was not beneficial to themselves. South Carolina nullified the tariff and didn't pay them. The north was outraged at this act. The north thought that the if South Carolina was able to repeal the tariff and ignore it, who would be able to stop them from ignoring laws regarding slavery? The north and the federal government were offended and angry. An example of their displeasure is shown in Henry Clay's speech to the Senate when he states "I merely throw out these sentiments for the purpose of showing you that South Carolina having…

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The other main reasons are the control of the government, economy, states' rights, abolitionism, and the election of 1860. Although the focus revolved around slavery a lot of the tension that led to the war was from how the South felt it had no power when it came to making decisions. “As new states were added to the Union, a series of compromises were arrived at to maintain an equal number of “free” and “slave” states” (Hickman 1). However; as new states were added they were all being declared “free” states without the South having any say in the matter. Fearing they were losing power the South turned to the states' rights argument, stating that the federal government didn't have the right to change the laws of slavery in states whom already own slaves (Ayers). Things grew worse during the abolitionist movements which called for an end for slavery, whether it be immediate or gradual. This caused many disputes among the people which often led to biblical disputes (Hickman1). Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin should the cruelty of the Fugitive Slave Act and gave support to the abolitionist movement. The election of 1860 was the final straw. With the election of Abraham Lincoln as president, they feared all was about to change. “The North with its growing population and increased electoral power had achieved what the South had always feared: complete control of the government by the free states”(Hickman 2). After the election the South immediately began to discuss seceding from the Union. The secession of the South was the ultimate leading factor for the North to go to war, in order to keep the country united…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq 1850's

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Constitution can be interpreted in many different ways, which leads to sectional discord and tension. For many reasons, the South evidently did not…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that the states had all the rights to take the tools and properties of the farmers to pay off the farmer's debts. I think that the property was a kind of collateral for the money that the farmers borrowed for the ammunition. <br><br>I do not think that Daniel Shays and his band of farmers had any right to rebel and close down the banks. I do think, however, that what he did was also a good thing. It made the states realize that a stronger central government was needed. It was used by important people such as George Washington, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton to help convince the different states to give more power to the central government. <br><br>I believe that the rebellion in itself wasn't very significant or important,…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Northerners opposed slavery, whereas the agriculture dependent Southerners supported it. It was on this issue that the most acerbic debates took place. For the unity and efficiency of the whole country, both sides gave in and made the most famous of the compromises, the Three-Fifth Clause, which won unanimous approval. Not wanting to loose the valuable revenues from the South, the Northerners compromised again in the Constitution by prohibiting Congress from outlawing the slave trade for at least twenty years in order to appeal to the masses. Was this necessarily the right and just decision? No. But it undeniably guaranteed the South as a part of the…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution was ratified in 1787 to make a stronger and better central government. Although it was hard to get it ratified, especially in the southern states, it was meant to keep the country together and to be the extreme law of the land. This document, although nearly perfect, did not mention slavery at all, as William Lloyd Garrison states in document B. This, to some extent, caused the nation to rip apart, but it was not the only thing that did. Although some people believe that the constitution caused disunity among the union it was not the constitution itself, but many different factors like the compact theory and slavery which angered either the north or the south.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The old constitution contained flaws that the new constitution filled in. In 1861 slavery was a hard issue to address because the South relies on them so heavily. The southerners could not accept the abolishment of slavery since their mindset was still that the negroes were inferior to white. South was against abolishment of slavery and the North was for abolishment of slavery. When Thomas Jefferson wrote “All men are created equal” even he, himself owned hundreds of slaves. Even though he knew it was wrong to have slaves he ignored that fact and slavery remained. 1861 the President Lincoln’s Inaugural and the Cornerstone speech, was seen by the majority of religious white that believed that the South was in the wrong. Both of these documents were the items needed to make peace throughout the…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The labor industry was also in a chaotic situation. Few jobs were available for grab. What`s more, wages attached to such were not enough to get by on. Technology was not advanced and manufacturing did not take…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 1987

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitution can be interpreted in many different ways, which leads to sectional discord and tension. For many reasons, the South did not like what the constitution said. There were many conflictions with the compromise of 1850, map shown in (Document A) and the fugitive slave act. Certain Northerners were against slavery and the fugitive slave act that they even posted warnings for the slaves. (Document C). This fugitive slave act also helped drive the tension deeper into the United States.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They depended greatly on the North for their industries and factories, because they had very few. They also opposed federal spending on internal improvements and they wanted no tariffs. Even despite having a somewhat weak economy, the South wanted to gain their independence to become their own country, and to have their own way of life, which included slavery as legal. When Abraham Lincoln was elected in 1860, the South thought that they would have no voice in the government, considering that Abraham Lincoln was against slavery. In hopes of being their own country, the South had no intention of fighting a war. However, before the war started, the South was unwilling to compromise. They thought that slavery should be allowed in all of the territories. They disagreed to the Missouri Compromise and to parts of the Compromise of 1850. Many felt that these compromises were unfair and biased. The South felt that their way of life and views on slavery were right and just. They turned to what they thought was their only choice: seceding from the Union. This enrage the North, which was one of the main causes of the Civil War.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Essay

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The controversy surrounding slavery between the North and South was crucial. The North did not want to have slavery because it was evil and cruel, but the South wanted slavery because it was their way of making money in the economy. Northerners had wanted to get rid of slavery, but Southern states seceded, leading to the Civil War. During the Civil War, in late January of 1863, President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed slaves in the Confederate states. Freedmen were allowed to join the Union army as shown in Document 5. After the Union won the Civil War, the 13th amendment was issued, abolishing slavery in…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One cause of the Civil War was that the North wanted to preserve the constitution while the South wanted a new government. The North even put some people in jail for voting to Secede from the Union. The founding fathers’ ideals were to create a government that would last the test of time. The South believed that they needed their own government, while the North believed that in order to stay…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1987 DBQ

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitution was never explained to how it was meant to be interpreted, which cause many disagreements, which ultimately started sectionalism, which is the loyalty to interests or views in one’s region of a country rather than the views or interests of the country as a whole. Sectionalism kick started the idea of sucession from the union, which started the bloodiest war on american soil, the Civil War. The misinterpretation on the views of slavery was the biggest argument as shown in multiple documents, (Document E), “To the Argument, that the word ‘slaves’ and ‘slavery’ are not to be found in the Constitution, and therefore it was never intended to give any protection or countenance to the slave system, it is sufficient to reply, that no such words are continued in the instrument, other words were used, intelligently and specifically, to meet the necessities of slavery.” This basically means that the constitution could have many interpretations on the basis that no “right” interpretation was ever stated.There were many feuds between documents following the Constitution such as the Compromise of 1850 as show in in the map of (Document A) where the country is broken into 2 parts, not unified because of slavery, along with the Fugitive Slave Law, (Document…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays