Preview

Aiu Criminal Justice 205 Unit 3 Db

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
682 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aiu Criminal Justice 205 Unit 3 Db
MEMO

To:

From:

Date: Sept 9, 2012

Re: Intro to Law (Cr Js. 205) Unit 3 IP

Message:

This Memo is a recap of the meeting between our client Mr. G. Ilty Assin, and Mr. Cheatham Esq. Attorney at Law.

The elements of murder including what is required to convict someone of attempt to commit murder.
The elements of common law murder are:
Unlawful killing of a human by another human with malice a premeditated thought of another human being, it is this state of mind that distinguishes murder from other forms of unlawful homicide. For example manslaughter either voluntary or involuntary. Murder is a very serious crime that holds the harshest punishment.

Mr. Assin is being charged with 1 count of attempted murder in the first degree.

The people must have proof that Mr. Assin attempted to commit murder. By this I mean

That: 1). Mr. Assin had to take a direct step that was ineffective toward killing Sally’s Husband. AND

2). That Mr. Assin intended to kill Sally’s husband.

Define a direct step, requirements are more than just planning or preparing to murder or gathering supplies or something needed to commit the murder.
This step goes beyond planning or preparation which will show that Mr. Assin is putting his plan into motion. Witkin & Epstein, (2000)

A step directly related to and an unambiguous intent to kill. It is a direct movement toward the commission after the preparations has been made, so that the plan could have been executed unless there were interferences that interrupted the attempt. Pen. Code, 663, (2012)

If in fact Mr. Assign did make a direct step and then for whatever reason decided against the murder, then Mr. Assin is still considered guilty of the said crime. Millman, et.al, (1999)

On the other hand, if Mr. Assin decided freely and voluntarily against committing the murder and did not take a direct step towards the attempt, then



References: Penal Code, §§ 21a, 663, 664), Attempted Murder People v. Guerra (1985), Specific Intent to Kill Required. ) 40 Cal.3d 377, 386 Witkin & Epstein, (2000), California Criminal Law 3rd ed. Elements, pgs. 53-67. Millman, Sevilla & Tarlow, (1999), California Criminal Defense Practice, Ch. 140, Challenges to Crimes, 140.02, Ch. 141, Conspiracy, Solicitation, and Attempt, 141.20; Ch. 142, Crimes Against the Person,  142.01   People v. Breverman (1998) 19 Cal.4th 142, 154 People v. Santascoy (1984) 153 Cal.App.3d 909, 918 Illinois Criminal Code, § 720 ILCS 5/ sections 8-4. Attempt. 8-4, Retrieved from the internet Sept, 8, 2012

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    wants to get to a specific goal? What implications will follow? Such planning is called a strategic…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    You are assigned to a tactical team and have five years on the department. The team is following a target, Mr. Lincoln who is a well known narcotics and stolen weapons dealer. The tactical team is trying to get Mr. Lincoln in a hand-to-hand transaction, which will solidify and close their case. The team has over 90% of their investigation complete, and the hand-to-hand transaction would solidify his involvement. You love your new team duties, but you are tired of just sitting on surveillance. You decide to take matters into your own hands. You testify that you conducted a surveillance and you witnessed Mr. Lincoln enter the building and conduct several hand-to-hand gun and weapons transactions. You select the time of 1:30 and 3:30am on February 12th. You write up the warrants and get the paperwork signed by the judge that day as you formally swear out the affidavit, search warrants and arrest warrant for Lincoln and his crew. Three detectives from another jurisdiction, City of Kaplan, which is 40 miles away, contact and inform him that they had a double homicide in their town and they have evidence and witnesses, and Mr. Lincoln is their number one suspect. They advise that the murders took place on February 12th, between 1:30 and 3:30 am. You realize Mr. Lincoln is very likely the murderer, but you’ve created an airtight alibi for Mr. Lincoln as you have already testified that you saw him in your time at that date and time.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justification: If evidence exists to justify the defendant’s acts, the killing will not be considered murder or any crime at all. An intentional killing can be justified if the defendant acts in self-defense.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “First-degree murder? Me? I wasn’t thinking straight.” Says the murderer of his wife and brother-in-law. How could he claim it was unintentional?…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Dickson

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    a) First degree murder is the deliberate and premeditated unlawful killing of a human being. Premeditation means that the defendant actually reflected on the idea of killing, if only for a brief period.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In terms of willfulness, first degree murderers must have the specific intent to end a human life. Perpetrators must have acted with malice or “malice aforethought” which includes a disposition or purpose and indifference to human life. Scott Peterson was charged with first-degree murder of his wife, Laci Peterson, and second-degree murder of his unborn son. His alibi was that he was away on a fishing trip when his wife disappeared, when just a few days later, her body and the remains of the fetus washed up upon the shores of the exact place that he claimed that he was fishing at. There was evidence that he had purchased two eighty pound bags of cement to use as anchors to sink the body.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many different legal categories of homicide. Two of these categories are; first degree murder and second degree murder. If the person acted with ‘malice aforethought’ or, planned to kill another individual and proceeded to carry out the act, then it is considered first degree murder. Shooting or stabbing someone in the heart, would be considered first degree murder, as the offender deliberately acted with malice aforethought, and therefore intended to kill the victim. Second degree murder is a homicide in which, the person did not intend to kill the victim, but still wanted to hurt…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have all gathered here today to bring justice to a poor old man, who was murdered in his own house. Everyone in the court was brought here to decide if this man is guilty of being insane or guilty of murder. The murder confused to stocking this old man and claimed that he killed him because of his eye. The murders cut of all his limbs after killing him and hide him under the floorboard. When police came to his house he confused after a few minutes of silence. After a few days, lawyers, jurors, a judge, an expert, a witness, the murder, and I have all gathered here to bring justice to this old man. From my point of view, as the documenter, this trail seems like a tough decision. As of now I feel like the murder is guilty of 1st degree murder. Now at 1:44 PM the prosecution lawyer begins.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A plan sets out the intended method of progressing from the current situation to the…

    • 2559 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miss

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the case of Arnold v Robert, the two elements can be proved actus rea, as The act was unlawful and also the mens rea as Arnold had the intention. The act was committed, several hours after the initial attack. This shows that Arnold had planned this unlawful act, which resulted in Robert’s death, being within the Queen’s peace with the intention to kill. Arnold would therefore be convicted of First-degree murder, as the killing was “planned and deliberate”. Those convicted of…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attempted Murder

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This memo will define murder, the elements of murder and will include what is required to convict someone to attempt to commit murder. I will also discuss whether the client Mr. Assin has committed this crime and will explain why or why he has not committed the crime.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the company’s employees is a murder who was judged innocent earlier still on the move. The accused employee took advantage of his manager’s cooperation in order to execute his own interests.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Definition Essay: Murder

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A person who's accused of unlawful killing in a court of law may be faced with a manslaughter charge by the prosecutor. Since there are different scenario's in which a unlawful killing can occur, there are different charges that come with the type of circumstances that surround each case. That is, first and second degree murder charges come into play as the murderer in question will need to be measured up which will tell the public and or jury if his or her intension was premeditated or not. Moreover, the law uses a another general term called manslaughter which has it's own two divisions as well.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three common elements in all crimes: mens rea (“guilty mind”), actus reus (“wrongful deed”) and causation. Many jurists also include concurrence (both the mens rea and actus reus must be connected). Mens rea or intent means that the criminal act must be voluntary or purposeful. It varies depending on the offense. For murder, the most heinous homicide, the mental element requires the defendant acted with “malice aforethought”. The malice aforethought distinguishes murder from manslaughter. The four states of mind that are said to make up malice aforethought are: the intent to kill, the intent to inflict great bodily injury, the intent to commit a felony or awareness of high risk of death or serious bodily injury. On the other hand, manslaughter is a legal term for the killing of a human being, in manner considered by law as less culpable than murder. The person accused for manslaughter didn’t have the intent to do a homicide, so guilty mind isn’t required. Actus reus (wrongful deed) is the second element of crimes. It refers to the criminal act or an unlawful omission of an act that must have occurred. So, if someone just thinks about killing someone else, they cannot be punished. The murder must be proven. In respect of manslaughter, actus reus is essential element too. There is no crime; there is no homicide without this element. Concurrence means that mens rea and actus reus occur at the same time. The murder is perfect example for…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I.A Blasphemy law-1

    • 1952 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Yildiz, K. The Kurds In Turkey: EU Accession And Human Rights. London: Pluto Press. 2005. Print.…

    • 1952 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics