Preview

Agency Scra: Case Digest

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6666 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Agency Scra: Case Digest
Friday, May 4, 2012
Domingo vs. Domingo, 42 SCRA 131, No. L-30573, October 29, 1971
Posted by Alchemy Business Center and Marketing Consultancy at 11:59 PM Labels: 1971, 42 SCRA 131, Civil Law Review, Domingo vs. Domingo,No. L-30573, October 29

Domingo vs. Domingo, 42 SCRA 131, No. L-30573, October 29, 1971
G.R. No. L-30573 October 29, 1971
VICENTE M. DOMINGO, represented by his heirs, ANTONINA RAYMUNDO VDA. DE DOMINGO, RICARDO, CESAR, AMELIA, VICENTE JR., SALVADOR, IRENE and JOSELITO, all surnamed DOMINGO, petitioners-appellants, vs. GREGORIO M. DOMINGO, respondent-appellee, TEOFILO P. PURISIMA, intervenor-respondent.
Teofilo Leonin for petitioners-appellants.
Osorio, Osorio & Osorio for respondent-appellee.
Teofilo P. Purisima in his own behalf as intervenor-respondent.

MAKASIAR, J.:
Petitioner-appellant Vicente M. Domingo, now deceased and represented by his heirs, Antonina Raymundo vda. de Domingo, Ricardo, Cesar, Amelia, Vicente Jr., Salvacion, Irene and Joselito, all surnamed Domingo, sought the reversal of the majority decision dated, March 12, 1969 of the Special Division of Five of the Court of Appeals affirming the judgment of the trial court, which sentenced the said Vicente M. Domingo to pay Gregorio M. Domingo P2,307.50 and the intervenor Teofilo P. Purisima P2,607.50 with interest on both amounts from the date of the filing of the complaint, to pay Gregorio Domingo P1,000.00 as moral and exemplary damages and P500.00 as attorney's fees plus costs.
The following facts were found to be established by the majority of the Special Division of Five of the Court of Appeals:
In a document Exhibit "A" executed on June 2, 1956, Vicente M. Domingo granted Gregorio Domingo, a real estate broker, the exclusive agency to sell his lot No. 883 of Piedad Estate with an area of about 88,477 square meters at the rate of P2.00 per square meter (or for P176,954.00) with a commission of 5% on the total price, if the property is sold by Vicente or by anyone else

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cjad

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Citations: to Support Judgment: Carlisle v. United States, 517 U.S. 416 (1996)Palermo v. United States, 360 U.S. 343 (1959)City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 597 (1997)Stansbury v. California, 511 U.S. 318 (1994) Rule of Law:…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eric J V

    • 304 Words
    • 1 Page

    Conclusion: The judgment in favor of the respondents is affirmed. Because we affirm the judgment, the protective cross appeal is moot.…

    • 304 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Observation

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Bibliography: Gumpresht, M. E. (2008, March 12). Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment. Civil Action No. 82A04-8876-CV-285…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nego Cases

    • 3956 Words
    • 16 Pages

    REMEDIOS NOTA SAPIERA appeals to us through this petition for review the Decision of the Court of Appeals[1] which acquitted her of the crime of estafa but held her liable nonetheless for the value of the checks she indorsed in favor of private respondent Ramon Sua.…

    • 3956 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Salita vs. Calleja Digest

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court decided the case in favor of Salita. It is stated that Salita has a greater claim over the proeprty since he actually possess a registered title and that he used his own money in order to pay for the property. The claim of Calleja is just for the security of her claim and not for ownership over the property. Also, the title given to Calleja cannot be accepted because of some…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Cases Digested

    • 3060 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The petition is granted. The decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the decision of the Regional Trial Court of Malolos, Bulacan is REVERSED and SET ASIDE. The petitioner is ACQUITTED of…

    • 3060 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Petitioner, Rosario T. de Vera, filed a bigamy case against her spouse Geren A. de Vera and Josephine F. Juliano after allegedly contracting a second marriage with the latter, which likewise has previous knowledge that accused he is still validly married to petitioner. Accused Geren pleaded guilty on arraignment but prayed on a latter motion that he be allowed to withdraw it in order to avail of the mitigating circumstance of voluntary surrender. Said motion was opposed by petitioner arguing that it shouldn’t be entertained for the case is already for promulgation and that not all the elements of voluntary surrender is present. The RTC granted the motion and held the accused guilty of bigamy but likewise appreciated the mitigating circumstances of voluntary surrender and plea of guilty in the determination of the penalty to be imposed. Petitioner moved for the partial reconsideration of the case which was denied. In 2005, Geren applied for probation which was favorably acted upon and referred to the probation office of San Juan. Petitioner filed a special civil action in the appellate court which affirmed the decision of the RTC and ruled that all the mitigating circumstance of voluntary surrender were present.…

    • 15570 Words
    • 63 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Soliven/Beltran V Makasiar

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Perfecto V. Fernandez, Jose P. Fernandez and Cristobal P. Fernandez for petitioner in G.R. Nos. 82827 and 83979.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Case Briefs

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thereafter, Regina and Antonio filed a complaint for ejectment against Elizabeth and Pastor in the MTC of Manila. Respondent entered his appearance as counsel for the defendants in that case. Hence, this instant administrative complaint was filed.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    torts case digest

    • 2493 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Spouses RENATO S. ONG and FRANCIA N. ONG, Petitioners, v. COURT OF APPEALS, INLAND TRAILWAYS, INC. and PHILTRANCO SERVICE ENTERPRISE, INC.,Respondents.…

    • 2493 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sales Digest

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Case Nature : APPEAL from a decision of the Court of First instance of Leyte.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil 1 Review Syllabus

    • 5533 Words
    • 23 Pages

    9. Bayot v. CA GR# 1555635 / 163979 / NOV. 07, 2008 570 SCRA 472…

    • 5533 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    HONORABLE MATEO M. LEANDA, in his capacity as Presiding Judge of RTC, Tacloban City, Branch 8, and LEYTE GULF TRADERS, INC., respondents.…

    • 93013 Words
    • 373 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On appeal is the Court of Appeals’ August 14, 2000 Decision1 in CA-G.R. CV No. 61334 and March 28, 2001 Resolution2 affirming the March 19, 1998 Decision3 of the Regional Trial Court of Manila which found petitioner liable to pay respondent Chubb and Sons, Inc. attorney's fees and costs of suit.…

    • 5451 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays